How do you apply Liesbet van Zoonen's feminist theory, that gender is constructed through discourse and women's bodies are coded as spectacle, to media products?
Feminist theory (Liesbet van Zoonen): gender is constructed through discourse and varies with context; in patriarchal media, women's bodies are often used as spectacle and objectified through the codes of representation.
How to apply Liesbet van Zoonen's feminist theory in WJEC A-Level Media Studies. Covers gender as a construction of discourse, the meaning of gender varying with context, the coding of women's bodies as spectacle and objectification, and how to use the theory on set products in the exam.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
Within representation, feminist theory analyses how media construct gender. Liesbet van Zoonen is one of the set feminist theorists. Her argument is that gender is constructed through discourse, that its meaning is not fixed but varies with context, and that in patriarchal media women's bodies are often used as spectacle and objectified. The exam skill is to read the codes that construct gender in a set product and to identify objectification where it occurs, while recognising that gender meaning can also be resisted or reworked.
The answer
Gender as a construction of discourse
- Not natural. Gender roles and ideals are constructed by representation, not dictated by biology.
- Contextual. What "masculine" or "feminine" means shifts with cultural and historical context.
- Contestable. Because it is constructed, gendered discourse can be challenged and changed.
The female body as spectacle
The analytical task is to read these codes in the set product. Where a woman is framed primarily as an object to be looked at, her body emphasised over her agency, the product is doing the patriarchal work van Zoonen describes. Naming the specific codes, how the figure is framed, posed and lit, and explaining their effect, is what earns the marks, rather than simply asserting that a representation is sexist.
Variation, context and resistance
This balance matters for the "how far" questions. The theory is not a claim that all media objectify women always; it is a claim that gender is constructed and that patriarchal media tend to objectify, which leaves room for counter-representation. A set product may objectify in some respects and resist in others, or update older codes. Reading both sides, and the context, produces a judgement rather than a blanket assertion.
Using the theory in the exam
- Name van Zoonen and the idea of gender as constructed through discourse.
- Read the codes that construct masculinity and femininity in the set product.
- Identify spectacle and objectification of the female body where it occurs, through specific codes.
- Recognise resistance, counter-types and the role of context.
- Judge how far the product constructs gender in patriarchal terms.
Examples in context
Reading gender in a set product with van Zoonen. Suppose a set product, an advertisement, a music video, a magazine or a television programme, constructs particular versions of masculinity and femininity. Using van Zoonen, the analysis first refuses to treat these as natural: they are produced by the product's discourse, its framing, costume, posture, editing and narrative roles. The analysis then looks specifically for spectacle and objectification: is a woman's body framed and posed to be looked at, emphasised through fragmenting close-ups, revealing costume or passive posture, positioned as an object of visual pleasure rather than an active agent? Where this occurs, the product is doing patriarchal work, and the specific codes are named and read. But van Zoonen's principle that gender meaning is contextual and constructed also directs the analysis to resistance: does the product, or another set product, construct active, complex or counter-typical gender identities that rework these codes? A strong answer reads both objectification and resistance, weighs the context, and judges how far the product constructs gender in patriarchal terms, naming van Zoonen and anchoring every point in specific codes of the text.
Try this
Q1. What does van Zoonen mean by saying gender is constructed through discourse? [2 marks]
- Cue. Masculinity and femininity are meanings produced by media representation, not natural givens, and they vary with context.
Q2. What does it mean to say a woman's body is used as spectacle? [3 marks]
- Cue. It is framed, posed and coded to be looked at, treated as an object of visual pleasure for a presumed viewer rather than as an active subject.
Q3. Using van Zoonen, explore how gender is represented in one set product, and judge how far it constructs gender in patriarchal terms. [15 marks]
- What the marker wants. Gender read as a construction of specific codes, objectification identified where it occurs, resistance and context recognised, and a supported judgement.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of WJEC exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
WJEC specimen15 marksExplore how gender is represented in one set product. Refer to feminist theory in your answer.Show worked answer →
The question rewards applying van Zoonen's argument that gender is constructed through discourse and that women are often coded as spectacle, not just describing the characters.
Establish the principle: gender is not natural but constructed through media discourse, and its meaning varies with cultural and historical context.
Then analyse the product: show how its codes (framing, costume, posture, editing, narrative role) construct masculinity and femininity, and identify where a woman's body is used as spectacle or objectified for a presumed viewer. The marks lie in reading the codes that construct gender and in identifying objectification where it occurs, anchored in the set product, with the theorist named. Note any departure from patriarchal coding.
WJEC specimen15 marksHow far do the set products construct gender in patriarchal terms? Refer to one theory of representation.Show worked answer →
A "how far" question wants a judgement using van Zoonen.
Argue that patriarchal coding is present: identify where the product objectifies women, uses the female body as spectacle, or constructs narrow gender roles, and explain how the codes do this.
Then weigh the other side: van Zoonen holds that gender meaning varies with context, so some set products resist, update or complicate patriarchal codes, offering counter-representations. The top band concludes on how far the products construct gender in patriarchal terms, recognising both objectification and resistance, supported by precise textual evidence and naming van Zoonen.
Related dot points
- Theories of representation (Stuart Hall): representation is the production of meaning through language and shared codes; it is constructive rather than reflective, and stereotyping fixes difference and reduces people to a few traits, often to maintain power.
How to apply Stuart Hall's theory of representation in WJEC A-Level Media Studies. Covers representation as the construction of meaning through shared codes, the constructionist view, stereotyping as the fixing and reduction of difference, the link to power, and how to use the theory on set products in the exam.
- Theories of identity (David Gauntlett): media offer a diverse and contradictory range of representations that audiences actively use as a 'pick and mix' of resources to construct and negotiate their own fluid identities.
How to apply David Gauntlett's theory of identity in WJEC A-Level Media Studies. Covers media as resources audiences pick and mix to build identity, the move from singular to diverse and fluid representations, the active audience, and how to use the theory on set products in the exam.
- Feminist theory (bell hooks): feminism is the struggle to end sexist oppression; that oppression is intersectional, shaped by the interlocking of gender, race and class, so media representation must be read across these axes together.
How to apply bell hooks' feminist theory in WJEC A-Level Media Studies. Covers feminism as a movement to end sexist oppression, intersectionality (the interlocking of gender, race and class), reading representation across these axes, and how to use the theory on set products in the exam.
- Gender performativity (Judith Butler): gender is not a fixed, natural essence but is constructed through the repeated performance of conventional acts; media circulate and can also disrupt these performances and the gender binary.
How to apply Judith Butler's theory of gender performativity in WJEC A-Level Media Studies. Covers gender as constructed through repeated performance rather than essence, the instability of the gender binary, how media reinforce or subvert gender norms, and how to use the theory on set products in the exam.
- Ethnicity and post-colonial theory (Paul Gilroy): media representations of race can perpetuate colonial discourse and binary othering, but post-colonial and diasporic identities also offer ways of challenging and rethinking those representations.
How to apply Paul Gilroy's theory of ethnicity and post-colonialism in WJEC A-Level Media Studies. Covers colonial discourse and binary othering, the persistence of imperial attitudes in media, diaspora and double consciousness, and how to use the theory on set products in the exam.
Sources & how we know this
- WJEC Eduqas GCE A Level Media Studies specification — WJEC Eduqas (2017)
- WJEC GCE Media Studies specification (Wales) — WJEC (2017)