How do you apply Paul Gilroy's theory of ethnicity and post-colonialism, including the ideas of colonial discourse, otherness and diaspora, to media representations of race?
Ethnicity and post-colonial theory (Paul Gilroy): media representations of race can perpetuate colonial discourse and binary othering, but post-colonial and diasporic identities also offer ways of challenging and rethinking those representations.
How to apply Paul Gilroy's theory of ethnicity and post-colonialism in WJEC A-Level Media Studies. Covers colonial discourse and binary othering, the persistence of imperial attitudes in media, diaspora and double consciousness, and how to use the theory on set products in the exam.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
Within representation, Paul Gilroy's theory of ethnicity and post-colonialism is the set theory for analysing representations of race. Its core claims are that media can perpetuate colonial discourse and binary othering, constructing non-white groups as an inferior "other" against a white norm, and that diasporic and post-colonial identities offer ways of challenging and rethinking those representations. The exam skill is to read the codes that construct ethnicity in a set product, identify colonial discourse or othering, and recognise where diasporic identity contests it.
The answer
Colonial discourse and binary othering
- Persistence. Imperial attitudes did not end with empire; they continue to shape representation.
- The other. Non-white groups are constructed as different, lesser, exotic or threatening, defined against a white norm.
- Hierarchy. The binary justifies and naturalises a racial hierarchy of power.
How othering works in media
The task is to locate where a set product constructs an "other": where a white norm is centred and a non-white group defined against it as different and lesser. This connects Gilroy to Hall on stereotyping and to bell hooks on intersectionality (race interlocking with gender and class); the theorists reinforce one another in reading race and power.
Diaspora, double consciousness and challenge
This is the contemporary edge of the theory and the counter-weight for "how far" questions. Not all representations of race reproduce colonial discourse; some draw on diasporic experience to construct identities that negotiate multiple belongings and contest the colonial binary. A representation that foregrounds hybridity, self-definition or double consciousness challenges the othering Gilroy critiques. Recognising both the persistence of colonial discourse and the possibility of challenge produces a judgement rather than a blanket claim.
Using the theory in the exam
- Name Gilroy and post-colonial theory.
- Read the codes that construct ethnicity in the set product.
- Identify colonial discourse and othering: where a white norm centres and an "other" is constructed.
- Recognise challenge: where diasporic identity or double consciousness contests the binary.
- Judge how far the product reinforces or challenges colonial attitudes.
Examples in context
Reading ethnicity in a set product with Gilroy. Suppose a set product represents characters of different ethnicities. A Gilroy reading first asks whether the product reproduces colonial discourse: is a white perspective or norm centred, and are non-white characters constructed as an "other", confined to marginal, exotic or threatening roles, exoticised through visual codes, or framed as backdrop to a white story? Where this occurs, the product perpetuates the binary othering Gilroy critiques, legitimising a racial hierarchy, and the specific codes, casting, narrative role, visual treatment, are named and read. But the analysis also looks for challenge: does the product, or another set product, draw on diasporic identity, hybridity or double consciousness to construct rounded, self-defined representations that contest the colonial binary? A representation that foregrounds a character's negotiation of more than one cultural belonging, rather than fixing them as a simple "other", works against colonial discourse. A strong answer reads both the persistence of colonial attitudes and the possibility of post-colonial challenge, judges how far the product reinforces or contests them, and names Gilroy throughout.
Try this
Q1. What is binary othering in post-colonial theory? [2 marks]
- Cue. Constructing a non-white group as an inferior, exotic or threatening "other" against an implicit white norm.
Q2. How can diaspora and double consciousness challenge colonial discourse? [3 marks]
- Cue. They open up post-colonial identities that negotiate more than one cultural belonging, contesting the fixed colonial binary.
Q3. Using Gilroy, explore how ethnicity is represented in one set product, and judge how far it reinforces or challenges colonial attitudes. [15 marks]
- What the marker wants. Ethnicity read through specific codes, colonial discourse and othering identified, diasporic challenge recognised, and a supported judgement, naming Gilroy.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of WJEC exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
WJEC specimen15 marksExplore how ethnicity is represented in one set product. Refer to post-colonial theory in your answer.Show worked answer →
The question rewards applying Gilroy's idea that representations of race can reproduce colonial discourse and binary othering, not just describing who is shown.
Establish the principle: post-colonial theory holds that media can perpetuate the attitudes of the colonial era, constructing non-white groups as an inferior, exotic or threatening "other" against a white norm, a binary that legitimises a power hierarchy.
Then analyse the product: read the codes that construct ethnicity, identify any colonial discourse or othering, and consider whether the product instead draws on diasporic identity to challenge that framing. The marks lie in reading the representation through colonial discourse and otherness, anchored in the set product, with the theorist named.
WJEC specimen15 marksHow far do the set products challenge or reinforce colonial attitudes in their representation of ethnicity? Refer to one theory of representation.Show worked answer →
A "how far" question wants a judgement using Gilroy.
Argue where colonial attitudes are reinforced: identify othering, exoticisation or the construction of a white norm against which other ethnicities are defined as inferior or threatening, and explain how the codes do this.
Then weigh the other side: some set products draw on diasporic and post-colonial identities to contest these attitudes, offering rounded or self-defined representations, and Gilroy's idea of double consciousness illuminates representations that negotiate more than one cultural belonging. The top band concludes on how far the products reinforce or challenge colonial attitudes, supported by precise evidence and naming Gilroy.
Related dot points
- Theories of representation (Stuart Hall): representation is the production of meaning through language and shared codes; it is constructive rather than reflective, and stereotyping fixes difference and reduces people to a few traits, often to maintain power.
How to apply Stuart Hall's theory of representation in WJEC A-Level Media Studies. Covers representation as the construction of meaning through shared codes, the constructionist view, stereotyping as the fixing and reduction of difference, the link to power, and how to use the theory on set products in the exam.
- Feminist theory (bell hooks): feminism is the struggle to end sexist oppression; that oppression is intersectional, shaped by the interlocking of gender, race and class, so media representation must be read across these axes together.
How to apply bell hooks' feminist theory in WJEC A-Level Media Studies. Covers feminism as a movement to end sexist oppression, intersectionality (the interlocking of gender, race and class), reading representation across these axes, and how to use the theory on set products in the exam.
- Theories of identity (David Gauntlett): media offer a diverse and contradictory range of representations that audiences actively use as a 'pick and mix' of resources to construct and negotiate their own fluid identities.
How to apply David Gauntlett's theory of identity in WJEC A-Level Media Studies. Covers media as resources audiences pick and mix to build identity, the move from singular to diverse and fluid representations, the active audience, and how to use the theory on set products in the exam.
- Gender performativity (Judith Butler): gender is not a fixed, natural essence but is constructed through the repeated performance of conventional acts; media circulate and can also disrupt these performances and the gender binary.
How to apply Judith Butler's theory of gender performativity in WJEC A-Level Media Studies. Covers gender as constructed through repeated performance rather than essence, the instability of the gender binary, how media reinforce or subvert gender norms, and how to use the theory on set products in the exam.
- Feminist theory (Liesbet van Zoonen): gender is constructed through discourse and varies with context; in patriarchal media, women's bodies are often used as spectacle and objectified through the codes of representation.
How to apply Liesbet van Zoonen's feminist theory in WJEC A-Level Media Studies. Covers gender as a construction of discourse, the meaning of gender varying with context, the coding of women's bodies as spectacle and objectification, and how to use the theory on set products in the exam.
Sources & how we know this
- WJEC Eduqas GCE A Level Media Studies specification — WJEC Eduqas (2017)
- WJEC GCE Media Studies specification (Wales) — WJEC (2017)