Skip to main content
WalesMediaSyllabus dot point

How do you apply Paul Gilroy's theory of ethnicity and post-colonialism, including the ideas of colonial discourse, otherness and diaspora, to media representations of race?

Ethnicity and post-colonial theory (Paul Gilroy): media representations of race can perpetuate colonial discourse and binary othering, but post-colonial and diasporic identities also offer ways of challenging and rethinking those representations.

How to apply Paul Gilroy's theory of ethnicity and post-colonialism in WJEC A-Level Media Studies. Covers colonial discourse and binary othering, the persistence of imperial attitudes in media, diaspora and double consciousness, and how to use the theory on set products in the exam.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.812 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

Within representation, Paul Gilroy's theory of ethnicity and post-colonialism is the set theory for analysing representations of race. Its core claims are that media can perpetuate colonial discourse and binary othering, constructing non-white groups as an inferior "other" against a white norm, and that diasporic and post-colonial identities offer ways of challenging and rethinking those representations. The exam skill is to read the codes that construct ethnicity in a set product, identify colonial discourse or othering, and recognise where diasporic identity contests it.

The answer

Colonial discourse and binary othering

  • Persistence. Imperial attitudes did not end with empire; they continue to shape representation.
  • The other. Non-white groups are constructed as different, lesser, exotic or threatening, defined against a white norm.
  • Hierarchy. The binary justifies and naturalises a racial hierarchy of power.

How othering works in media

The task is to locate where a set product constructs an "other": where a white norm is centred and a non-white group defined against it as different and lesser. This connects Gilroy to Hall on stereotyping and to bell hooks on intersectionality (race interlocking with gender and class); the theorists reinforce one another in reading race and power.

Diaspora, double consciousness and challenge

This is the contemporary edge of the theory and the counter-weight for "how far" questions. Not all representations of race reproduce colonial discourse; some draw on diasporic experience to construct identities that negotiate multiple belongings and contest the colonial binary. A representation that foregrounds hybridity, self-definition or double consciousness challenges the othering Gilroy critiques. Recognising both the persistence of colonial discourse and the possibility of challenge produces a judgement rather than a blanket claim.

Using the theory in the exam

  1. Name Gilroy and post-colonial theory.
  2. Read the codes that construct ethnicity in the set product.
  3. Identify colonial discourse and othering: where a white norm centres and an "other" is constructed.
  4. Recognise challenge: where diasporic identity or double consciousness contests the binary.
  5. Judge how far the product reinforces or challenges colonial attitudes.

Examples in context

Reading ethnicity in a set product with Gilroy. Suppose a set product represents characters of different ethnicities. A Gilroy reading first asks whether the product reproduces colonial discourse: is a white perspective or norm centred, and are non-white characters constructed as an "other", confined to marginal, exotic or threatening roles, exoticised through visual codes, or framed as backdrop to a white story? Where this occurs, the product perpetuates the binary othering Gilroy critiques, legitimising a racial hierarchy, and the specific codes, casting, narrative role, visual treatment, are named and read. But the analysis also looks for challenge: does the product, or another set product, draw on diasporic identity, hybridity or double consciousness to construct rounded, self-defined representations that contest the colonial binary? A representation that foregrounds a character's negotiation of more than one cultural belonging, rather than fixing them as a simple "other", works against colonial discourse. A strong answer reads both the persistence of colonial attitudes and the possibility of post-colonial challenge, judges how far the product reinforces or contests them, and names Gilroy throughout.

Try this

Q1. What is binary othering in post-colonial theory? [2 marks]

  • Cue. Constructing a non-white group as an inferior, exotic or threatening "other" against an implicit white norm.

Q2. How can diaspora and double consciousness challenge colonial discourse? [3 marks]

  • Cue. They open up post-colonial identities that negotiate more than one cultural belonging, contesting the fixed colonial binary.

Q3. Using Gilroy, explore how ethnicity is represented in one set product, and judge how far it reinforces or challenges colonial attitudes. [15 marks]

  • What the marker wants. Ethnicity read through specific codes, colonial discourse and othering identified, diasporic challenge recognised, and a supported judgement, naming Gilroy.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of WJEC exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

WJEC specimen15 marksExplore how ethnicity is represented in one set product. Refer to post-colonial theory in your answer.
Show worked answer →

The question rewards applying Gilroy's idea that representations of race can reproduce colonial discourse and binary othering, not just describing who is shown.

Establish the principle: post-colonial theory holds that media can perpetuate the attitudes of the colonial era, constructing non-white groups as an inferior, exotic or threatening "other" against a white norm, a binary that legitimises a power hierarchy.

Then analyse the product: read the codes that construct ethnicity, identify any colonial discourse or othering, and consider whether the product instead draws on diasporic identity to challenge that framing. The marks lie in reading the representation through colonial discourse and otherness, anchored in the set product, with the theorist named.

WJEC specimen15 marksHow far do the set products challenge or reinforce colonial attitudes in their representation of ethnicity? Refer to one theory of representation.
Show worked answer →

A "how far" question wants a judgement using Gilroy.

Argue where colonial attitudes are reinforced: identify othering, exoticisation or the construction of a white norm against which other ethnicities are defined as inferior or threatening, and explain how the codes do this.

Then weigh the other side: some set products draw on diasporic and post-colonial identities to contest these attitudes, offering rounded or self-defined representations, and Gilroy's idea of double consciousness illuminates representations that negotiate more than one cultural belonging. The top band concludes on how far the products reinforce or challenge colonial attitudes, supported by precise evidence and naming Gilroy.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this