Skip to main content
WalesMediaSyllabus dot point

How do you apply Livingstone and Lunt's argument about the tension between protecting citizens and serving consumers, and the strain digital convergence puts on regulation, to analyse media industries?

Regulation (Sonia Livingstone and Peter Lunt): there is a tension in regulation between the need to protect the interests of citizens and the need to serve the interests of consumers; the rise of global, convergent and digital media puts traditional, nationally based regulation under strain.

How to apply Livingstone and Lunt's theory of media regulation in WJEC A-Level Media Studies. Covers what regulation is, the tension between protecting citizens and serving consumers, the strain global and convergent digital media put on national regulation, and how to use the theory on set products and industry contexts in the exam.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.813 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

Media industries asks how ownership, funding, production, distribution and regulation shape what audiences receive. Sonia Livingstone and Peter Lunt's theory of regulation is a set theory for this area. Its core claim is that regulation is pulled between protecting the interests of citizens and serving the interests of consumers, and that global, convergent and digital media put traditional, nationally based regulation under strain. The exam skill is to read how the rules governing an industry shape a set product.

The answer

What regulation is

  • Rules and restrictions. Regulation constrains what producers may make and circulate.
  • Industry-specific. Each form has its own regulator and code.

Citizens versus consumers

This citizen and consumer tension is the analytical core. Reading a set product through it means asking which interest a rule serves: an age certificate or watershed protects citizens; a light-touch, pro-competition approach serves consumers by widening choice. The marks lie in identifying the balance struck and its effect on the product.

Convergence and the strain on regulation

For the higher bands this is the up-to-date, evaluative edge of the theory. National regulators were built for broadcast-era media; global platforms and user-generated content strain that model. Bringing this in lets you judge how far regulation still governs a product's industry, and links Livingstone and Lunt to Shirky on audiences and Hesmondhalgh on global conglomerates.

Strengths, limits and evaluation

Using the theory in the exam

  1. Name Livingstone and Lunt and the citizen and consumer tension.
  2. Identify the regulator and rules for the set product's industry.
  3. Read the balance: where the rules protect citizens, where they serve consumers.
  4. Bring in convergence: how global, digital and online media strain that regulation.
  5. Judge, weighing the reach of regulation against the strain, and conclude on how far it shapes the product.

Examples in context

Reading an industry through regulation. Suppose a set product belongs to an industry with a clear regulator, such as film or broadcasting. Using Livingstone and Lunt, the first move is to name the rules: the certification or code the product must meet, and what it permits or restricts. The second move is to read the citizen and consumer balance: an age rating or content warning protects citizens, especially vulnerable audiences, while a competitive, choice-driven market serves consumers; which interest does the regulation here prioritise, and how does that shape the product's content, scheduling or distribution? The third move, decisive for the top bands, is convergence: global corporations, convergent technologies and online distribution strain national regulation, so similar content might circulate unregulated online. Judge how far regulation still governs this product's industry, keeping the analysis tied to the specific regulator and rules rather than general claims about censorship.

Try this

Q1. What are the two competing interests Livingstone and Lunt say regulation must balance? [2 marks]

  • Cue. The interests of citizens (protection from harm and offence) and of consumers (choice, value and competition).

Q2. Why do Livingstone and Lunt argue traditional regulation is under strain? [3 marks]

  • Cue. Global media corporations, convergent technologies and digital and online distribution put nationally based regulation at risk, as online content can bypass national rules.

Q3. Using Livingstone and Lunt, assess how far regulation shapes the industry behind one set product. [15 marks]

  • What the marker wants. The regulator and rules identified, the citizen and consumer balance read, the strain of convergence weighed, and a supported judgement on how far regulation shapes the product.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of WJEC exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

WJEC specimen15 marksHow far does regulation shape the media industry responsible for one set product? Refer to a theory of regulation.
Show worked answer →

The question rewards using Livingstone and Lunt to read regulation as a balance of competing interests, not just naming a regulator.

Establish the principle: regulation is the rules and restrictions every media industry must follow, and Livingstone and Lunt argue it is pulled between protecting the interests of citizens (from harm and offence) and serving the interests of consumers (choice, value, competition).

Then apply it to the set product's industry: identify the relevant regulator and rules (for example certification or broadcasting codes), show where they protect citizens and where they free up consumer choice, and explain how this shapes what the product can be and how it reaches audiences. The "how far" demands judgement: weigh the reach of regulation against the strain that global, convergent and online media place on it, and conclude with Livingstone and Lunt named.

WJEC specimen10 marksExplain the tension Livingstone and Lunt identify in media regulation.
Show worked answer →

A focused "explain" wants the citizen and consumer tension stated precisely.

State that Livingstone and Lunt argue recent regulation is pulled between two aims. The first is to further the interests of citizens, by protecting the public from harmful or offensive material and safeguarding the public interest. The second is to further the interests of consumers, by ensuring choice, value for money and market competition. The tension is that protection can restrict the free market, while a free market can leave the public exposed.

Complete the answer with their point about change: global media corporations, convergent technologies and digital production and distribution place traditional, nationally based regulation under strain, since online content can often slip past national rules. A strong answer names Livingstone and Lunt and keeps the focus on regulation.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this