Skip to main content
EnglandClassical CivilisationSyllabus dot point

How did the institutions of Athenian democracy work together to give power to the people?

Democracy and the Athenians: the institutions of the democracy, including the Assembly (ekklesia), the Council of 500 (boule), the law courts (dikasteria), the magistracies, and the mechanisms of sortition (the lottery) and ostracism.

An OCR A-Level Classical Civilisation (H408/34) study of the institutions of Athenian democracy. Covers the Assembly (ekklesia), the Council of 500 (boule), the law courts (dikasteria), the magistracies, and the use of sortition and ostracism, using sources such as Aristotle's Athenaion Politeia, with the source and essay skills the paper rewards.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.818 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

Athenian democracy worked through a set of interlocking institutions. For this option you must understand the Assembly (ekklesia), the Council of 500 (boule), the law courts (dikasteria), the magistracies, and the mechanisms of sortition (the lottery) and ostracism, and how they fitted together. The paper tests precise knowledge (AO1), analysis and evaluation of sources (AO2 and AO3) and your own argument.

The answer

The Assembly (ekklesia): the sovereign people

The Council of 500 (boule): preparing the business

A mass Assembly could not manage everything, so the Council of 500 (boule) did the preparatory work:

  • It was chosen by lot for one year, fifty councillors from each of the ten tribes, so a large cross-section of citizens served.
  • It prepared the agenda (the probouleuma) for the Assembly, so the people voted only on considered business.
  • It managed day-to-day administration and finances, with a rotating committee of prytaneis (one tribe's delegation at a time) in charge and able to convene the Assembly.

The Council made mass democracy workable by handling affairs between Assembly meetings.

The law courts (dikasteria) and the magistracies

Sortition and ostracism

Two mechanisms were especially characteristic of the democracy:

  • Sortition (selection by lot) for the Council, the courts and most offices embodied the principle that all citizens were equally capable of governing, and prevented the wealthy from dominating, expressing isonomia.
  • Ostracism allowed the Assembly, once a year, to vote (by writing a name on a potsherd, an ostrakon) to exile a citizen for ten years without loss of property, a safeguard against any individual growing too powerful and threatening the democracy.

Together these institutions gave Athenian citizens an unusually direct and equal share in ruling and being ruled in turn.

Examples in context

A strong 10-mark idea answer on the boule would explain its composition (lot, ten tribes) and its role (agenda-setting, administration, the prytaneis) and how it made democracy workable.

Try this

Q1. Explain how the Athenian law courts (dikasteria) worked. You must refer to specific examples. [10 marks]

  • What the marker wants. AO1 with AO3: describe the large citizen juries chosen by lot and paid, deciding by majority vote without judges or lawyers, and explain how this gave the people power over justice and officials.

Q2. 'Athenian democracy could not have worked without the Council of 500.' To what extent do you agree? [marked out of 20; real H408/34 tariff is 30]

  • Cue. Argue both sides: the Council made the sovereign Assembly workable by preparing business and running administration, but the Assembly held the real power. Reach a judgement supported by named institutions.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of OCR exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

OCR H408/34 2020 (idea style)10 marksExplain the role of the boule (Council of 500) in the Athenian democracy. You must refer to specific examples. [10]
Show worked answer →

A 10-mark idea question (AO1 with AO3), answered from your wider knowledge.

Establish the Council: the boule of 500, chosen by lot from the ten tribes (50 from each), served for one year.

Give specific examples of its role: preparing the agenda (probouleuma) for the Assembly, so nothing could be voted on without prior consideration; managing day-to-day administration and finances; and the rotating committee of prytaneis who ran affairs and could convene the Assembly.

Conclude on how the Council made mass democracy workable by handling business between Assembly meetings.

OCR H408/34 2021 (essay, true tariff 30)20 marks'Sortition was the most democratic feature of the Athenian system.' To what extent do you agree? [marked here out of 20; the real H408/34 essay tariff is 30]
Show worked answer →

The extended-essay type (30 marks live, capped at 20 here). Tests AO1, AO2 and AO3.

For (sortition most democratic). Choosing officials and councillors by lot, rather than election, treated all citizens as equally capable of office, prevented the rich from monopolising power, and embodied isonomia.

Against (other features, and limits). The sovereign Assembly, open to all citizens, was arguably more fundamental; and key posts such as the generals (strategoi) were elected, not allotted, because they needed expertise, showing sortition had limits.

Judgement. The top band argues a clear line, for instance that sortition was the most distinctively democratic mechanism, embodying equality, even though the system also relied on the sovereign Assembly and on elected experts for some roles. Support with named institutions.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this