Skip to main content
EnglandClassical CivilisationSyllabus dot point

Who counted as a citizen in democratic Athens, and who was excluded?

Democracy and the Athenians: the definition of Athenian citizenship and the citizenship law of 451 BC, the rights and duties of citizens, and the exclusion of women, metics and slaves, and the tension between democratic ideals and social reality.

An OCR A-Level Classical Civilisation (H408/34) study of citizenship and exclusion in democratic Athens. Covers the definition of citizenship and the law of 451 BC, the rights and duties of citizens, and the exclusion of women, metics and slaves, with the tension between democratic ideals and reality, and the source and essay skills the paper rewards.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.818 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

Athenian democracy was a democracy of citizens, and the definition of who counted as one is central to judging it. For this option you must understand the definition of citizenship and the law of 451 BC, the rights and duties of citizens, and the exclusion of women, metics and slaves, and the tension between democratic ideals and social reality. The paper tests precise knowledge (AO1), analysis and evaluation of sources (AO2 and AO3) and your own argument.

The answer

The definition of citizenship and the law of 451 BC

The rights and duties of citizens

Citizens enjoyed substantial rights and bore real duties:

  • Rights: to speak and vote in the Assembly, sit on juries, hold most offices (by lot), and own land.
  • Duties: above all military service (as hoplites or rowers), and, for the rich, the funding of public works and festivals through liturgies (such as equipping a warship or a chorus).
  • This combination of political rights and civic obligations defined the citizen as one who shared in ruling and being ruled in turn.

The excluded majority: women, metics and slaves

The tension between ideal and reality

There is a sharp tension between the democracy's ideals and its reality:

  • The ideal, voiced by Pericles in Thucydides' Funeral Oration, was one of equality (isonomia) and openness, where advancement depended on merit and all shared in the city.
  • The reality was that full political rights belonged only to a minority (adult male citizens), while women, metics and slaves were excluded.
  • Both judgements are true depending on the frame: among citizens the democracy was radically inclusive (the poorest could speak and vote), but in defining that body it was deeply exclusive.

This tension is a central theme of the option and a favourite essay focus.

Examples in context

A strong 10-mark idea answer on exclusion would name the excluded groups (women, metics, slaves), explain their position, and give the reasons (descent, gender, status).

Try this

Q1. Explain the position of metics in Athenian society. You must refer to specific examples. [10 marks]

  • What the marker wants. AO1 with AO3: describe metics (resident foreigners who could not vote or own land and needed a sponsor, but paid taxes, traded and served in the army) and explain their contribution and their exclusion.

Q2. 'The exclusion of women is the greatest limitation of Athenian democracy.' To what extent do you agree? [marked out of 20; real H408/34 tariff is 30]

  • Cue. Argue both sides: the total political exclusion of women (half the citizen population) was a profound limitation, though the exclusion of metics and slaves and the narrowness of citizenship also mattered. Reach a judgement supported by named examples.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of OCR exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

OCR H408/34 2019 (idea style)10 marksExplain who was excluded from Athenian citizenship and why. You must refer to specific examples. [10]
Show worked answer →

A 10-mark idea question (AO1 with AO3), answered from your wider knowledge.

Establish the citizen body: full citizenship was restricted to adult males with (after 451 BC) two Athenian parents.

Give specific examples of those excluded: women (Athenian women had no political rights and were legally dependent on a male guardian); metics (resident foreigners, who could not vote or own land but paid taxes and served in the army); and slaves (who had no rights at all). Explain the reasons (descent, gender, status).

Conclude on the contrast between the democratic ideal of equality and the narrowness of the citizen body.

OCR H408/34 2021 (essay, true tariff 30)20 marks'Athenian democracy was deeply exclusive.' To what extent do you agree? [marked here out of 20; the real H408/34 essay tariff is 30]
Show worked answer →

The extended-essay type (30 marks live, capped at 20 here). Tests AO1, AO2 and AO3.

For (exclusive). Only adult male citizens (a minority of the population) had political rights; women, metics and slaves, the majority, were excluded; the citizenship law of 451 narrowed the body further.

Against (relatively inclusive for its time). Among citizens, the democracy was remarkably inclusive: the poorest male citizen could speak and vote in the Assembly, sit on juries and hold most offices, which was radical by ancient standards.

Judgement. The top band argues a clear line, for instance that Athenian democracy was radically inclusive within the citizen body but deeply exclusive in defining that body, so both judgements are true depending on the frame. Support with named examples.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this