Whose interests does the family really serve, according to Marxists and feminists?
Component 1 Section B (Families and households): Marxist perspectives on the family (Engels, ideological functions, the unit of consumption) and feminist perspectives (liberal, Marxist, radical and difference feminism), as conflict critiques of the family.
An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Families and households guide to the conflict perspectives. Covers Marxist views (Engels on private property, the family as a unit of consumption, ideological functions) and the four feminist perspectives (liberal, Marxist, radical and difference), as critiques of the functionalist consensus view.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
This statement covers the conflict perspectives on the family: Marxism and feminism. Where functionalists see the family meeting society's needs, conflict theorists ask whose interests it really serves. You need the Marxist view (Engels on private property, the family as a unit of consumption, its ideological functions) and the four strands of feminism (liberal, Marxist, radical and difference). It is the direct critique of the functionalist consensus and a rich source of evaluation in every family essay.
The answer
The Marxist view
The Marxist account has several strands:
- Engels argued the monogamous nuclear family developed alongside private property: as wealth accumulated, men needed to ensure their property passed to their legitimate heirs, so women's sexuality and reproduction were controlled. The family thus arose to serve inheritance.
- The modern family reproduces labour power: it raises the next generation of workers and maintains current workers (physically and emotionally) at no cost to employers.
- The family is a unit of consumption: it buys the goods capitalism produces (cars, gadgets, "must-have" children's products), generating profit and being targeted by advertising.
- The family transmits ideology: children learn to accept hierarchy, authority and inequality as natural, preparing them to accept their place under capitalism. Zaretsky added that the family offers an illusory "haven" from alienating work, absorbing discontent that might otherwise threaten capitalism.
The feminist view: four strands
Feminists agree the family is a site of inequality, but argue it serves men and reproduces patriarchy. They divide into four positions:
- Liberal feminists see gradual progress towards equality, driven by changing attitudes, law (equal pay, divorce reform) and the march of progress. They are the most optimistic.
- Marxist feminists argue women's unpaid domestic labour benefits capitalism: women reproduce and service the workforce for free (Benston), and absorb the frustrations of male workers, what Ansley memorably called the "takers of shit". Women's oppression is tied to class exploitation.
- Radical feminists see the family as the key site of patriarchal oppression. The domestic division of labour and domestic violence show male power; Delphy and Leonard argue the family is an economic system in which men exploit women's labour. Some radical feminists advocate separatism (Greer's idea of the matrifocal household).
- Difference feminists argue there is no single female experience: class and ethnicity mean some women face very different family lives, so the family cannot be analysed as if all women were the same.
Evaluating the conflict perspectives
Both perspectives are powerful but criticised. Marxism is accused of economic reductionism (explaining everything by capitalism) and of ignoring real family diversity and the satisfaction people find in family life. Feminism, especially the radical version, is criticised for understating the progress women have made, the agency women exercise, and the warmth many experience in families. Difference feminism itself is a useful corrective, reminding us that family experience varies by class and ethnicity.
Examples in context
A strong answer keeps the four feminist strands distinct, attributes Marxist claims to the right thinkers (Engels, Zaretsky, Benston), and uses the strands to evaluate one another rather than treating "feminism" as one block.
Try this
Q1. Explain what Marxists mean by the family as a 'unit of consumption'. [6 marks]
- What the marker wants. A definition (AO1): the family buys the goods capitalism produces (consumer products, children's "must-haves"), generating profit and being targeted by advertising, with the point that this benefits the ruling class.
Q2. Analyse two differences between Marxist feminist and radical feminist views of the family. [12 marks]
- Cue. Two developed points: Marxist feminists tie women's oppression to capitalism (unpaid domestic labour serving capital), while radical feminists tie it to patriarchy and male power (domestic violence, exploitation by men), each explained and linked to the different cause each strand identifies.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of WJEC Eduqas exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
Eduqas A200 20196 marksExplain one Marxist criticism of the family. [6]Show worked answer →
A short Section B knowledge question (AO1 with application). Make the point and develop it.
Point. Marxists argue the family serves capitalism, not society as a whole. It acts as a unit of consumption, buying the goods capitalism produces and generating profit.
Development. It also reproduces labour power and transmits ruling-class ideology, teaching children to accept hierarchy and inequality, so the family benefits the bourgeoisie. Naming a specific function (consumption, ideology) and explaining it secures the marks.
Eduqas A200 202120 marksEvaluate feminist perspectives on the family. [20]Show worked answer →
A Section B essay (AO1, AO2 and AO3), shown at the 20-mark cap (worth more in the full paper), marked by levels of response.
For. Feminists show the family is patriarchal: radical feminists point to male power and domestic violence, Marxist feminists to unpaid domestic labour serving capitalism, liberal feminists to slow but real progress towards equality.
Against. Feminism can downplay the gains women have made and the satisfaction some find in family life; difference feminists argue there is no single female experience (class, ethnicity matter).
Judgement. Feminism rightly exposes inequality and power in the family, but the radical version may overstate it given real change; a class- and ethnicity-sensitive feminism is most convincing. A balanced judgement reaches the top band.
Related dot points
- Component 1 Section B (Families and households): functionalist perspectives on the family, including Murdock's four functions, Parsons's functional fit and the irreducible functions, and New Right views of the family, with their criticisms.
An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Families and households guide to functionalist and New Right perspectives. Covers Murdock's four functions, Parsons's functional fit and two irreducible functions, the warm bath theory, the New Right view of the traditional nuclear family, and the criticisms from Marxists and feminists.
- Component 1 Section B (Families and households): family diversity (the Rapoports' five types), changing patterns of marriage, divorce, cohabitation and lone-parent and reconstituted families, and the debate between the New Right and postmodernists over diversity.
An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Families and households guide to diversity and change. Covers the Rapoports' five types of diversity, changing patterns of marriage, divorce, cohabitation, lone-parent and reconstituted families, the reasons behind them, and the New Right versus postmodernist debate over family diversity.
- Component 1 Section B (Families and households): conjugal roles and the domestic division of labour, the symmetrical family debate, the dual burden and triple shift, decision-making and money management, and domestic violence as evidence of power.
An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Families and households guide to conjugal roles and power. Covers segregated and joint conjugal roles, Young and Willmott's symmetrical family, Oakley's critique, the dual burden and triple shift, decision-making and money management, and domestic violence as evidence of patriarchal power.
- Component 1 Section B (Families and households): childhood as a social construction (Aries), the changing position of children, the march of progress versus conflict views (Palmer's toxic childhood, the child liberationist critique), and cross-cultural and historical differences.
An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Families and households guide to childhood. Covers childhood as a social construction (Aries), cross-cultural and historical differences, the march of progress view, conflict and child liberationist critiques (the toxic childhood thesis, age patriarchy), and the debate over whether childhood is disappearing.
- Component 3 Section A: patterns and trends in social inequality, including the distribution of wealth and income, the measurement and definition of poverty, social mobility, and explanations of why inequality and poverty persist.
An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Power and Stratification guide to patterns of inequality. Covers the distribution of wealth and income, absolute and relative poverty and how it is measured, social mobility, the cycle of deprivation versus structural and cultural explanations, and why inequality and poverty persist.
Sources & how we know this
- Eduqas A Level Sociology Specification (A200) — Eduqas (2015)