What are the levels of language analysis, and how do you apply phonology, lexis, grammar, semantics and graphology to literary texts?
The levels of language analysis as the metalinguistic toolkit for 7707: phonology and prosodics, lexis and semantics, grammar and morphology, and graphology, applied to literary and non-literary texts.
An overview of the levels of language analysis for AQA 7707: phonology and prosodics, lexis and semantics, grammar and morphology, and graphology, and how to apply this metalinguistic toolkit to literary and non-literary texts with accurate terminology.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
The levels of language analysis are the systematic toolkit you apply to every text on the course. Knowing them gives you a precise vocabulary (metalanguage) for describing how a text works layer by layer, from sound to visual presentation. The skill is to select the levels most relevant to a text and to move from naming a feature to explaining its effect, rather than working through all of them mechanically. These levels are the raw material the integrated method turns into argument.
Phonology and prosodics
The analytical move is to connect the quality of the sound to the meaning. Plosive consonants (the hard stops of p, b, t, d, k, g) can convey force, anger or abruptness; fricatives (f, v, s, sh) can convey softness, menace or slipperiness; sibilance can whisper or hiss. Rhythm and metre matter most when they are disrupted: a line that breaks its established metre at a moment of crisis uses prosody to enact the disturbance. Always argue the link rather than spotting the device, because the sound only earns marks when you show what it does.
Lexis and semantics
This level covers word choice and meaning: denotation and connotation, lexical fields, register and formality, semantic change and figurative meaning. Tracking a lexical field across a text (a field of decay, of warfare, of the natural world) is one of the most reliable routes into theme and tone. Distinguish the denotation of a word (its literal reference) from its connotations (the associations it carries), because writers exploit the gap between them. Register and formality place a voice socially, and a shift in register within a text is often a turning point worth analysing.
Grammar and morphology
The high-value grammatical tools for literary analysis are transitivity (who acts on whom, which builds power and agency), modality (modal verbs and adverbs that encode certainty and attitude), noun phrases and modification (pre- and post-modification that builds detailed impressions of people and places), and sentence variety (short declaratives for impact, long subordinated sentences for complexity or strain). Aspect (the progressive for ongoing action, the perfect for completed action with present relevance) and voice (active versus passive, where the passive can hide or foreground an agent) are subtle but powerful when a question turns on how time or responsibility is handled.
Graphology
Graphology is the visual dimension: layout, typography, line breaks and enjambment, caesura, punctuation as visual signal, capitalisation and the use of white space. It is essential for poetry on the page, where stanza shape and line endings carry meaning, and for non-fiction texts such as those in the Paris Anthology, where headings, columns and images shape how a reader navigates. Argue the interaction between the visual form and the verbal content rather than describing the layout in isolation.
How to revise the levels
Drill the metalanguage until naming features is automatic, then practise selecting the right levels for different text types: phonology and graphology for poetry, lexis and grammar for prose, pragmatics and discourse for drama and speech. Build a short reference card for each level so that under exam pressure you reach for the precise term rather than the vague one.
Try this
Q1. Name four levels of language analysis. [4 marks]
- Cue. Phonology and prosodics, lexis and semantics, grammar and morphology, graphology (discourse and pragmatics are further levels).
Q2. Explain why you should apply the levels selectively rather than all at once. [3 marks]
- Cue. Different text types reward different levels; depth on the most relevant levels beats shallow coverage of all of them.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of AQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
AQA 201916 marksAnalyse how the writer uses lexis and grammar to present a character or a place in an extract you have studied.Show worked answer →
This question targets two named levels, so the answer must work at the level of word choice and sentence structure, not vague technique. Markers reward precise metalanguage tied to effect.
For lexis, analyse the lexical field, denotation and connotation, and register, showing how word choice builds the impression. For grammar, analyse noun phrases and modification for how people and places are presented, and transitivity and sentence variety for agency and pace.
Select the most telling features rather than working through every level. Each named feature must be followed by its effect on the reader; identification alone earns little.
AQA 202116 marksExamine how phonological and graphological features contribute to meaning in a poem you have studied.Show worked answer →
A poetry-focused question on the sound and visual levels. Markers reward analysis that links sound and layout to meaning rather than spotting devices.
For phonology, analyse sound patterning (alliteration, assonance, sibilance, rhyme, rhythm, metre) and how it reinforces or undercuts sense. For graphology, analyse line breaks, stanza shape, enjambment, caesura and white space, and how the visual form interacts with content.
Show the interaction: where sound and layout pull together or against the words. Conclude on the effect on the reader, because a list of devices without effect caps the AO1 and AO2 marks.
Related dot points
- The integrated method at the heart of 7707: combining literary interpretation with precise linguistic analysis so that language evidence drives interpretation rather than sitting beside it.
An explanation of the integrated language and literature method that defines AQA 7707: how to combine literary interpretation with precise linguistic analysis so that named features evidence meaning, and how this differs from language-only or literature-only study.
- Discourse and pragmatics as analytical methods: cohesion and whole-text structure, and meaning in context through implicature, speech acts, deixis, politeness and turn-taking.
How to apply discourse and pragmatics in AQA 7707: cohesion and whole-text structure, and meaning in context through implicature, Grice's maxims, speech acts, deixis, politeness and turn-taking, applied to dialogue and whole texts.
- Narratology as a method: the concepts of story and discourse, narration and voice, focalisation, narrative time and reliability, applied to fiction and non-fiction across the course.
How to use narratology in AQA 7707: the distinction between story and discourse, types of narration and voice, focalisation, narrative time and reliability, and how these concepts of point of view apply across fiction and non-fiction.
- Studying the prose set text for Telling Stories: narrative structure, characterisation, point of view and style, analysed through the integrated language and literature method.
How to analyse the AQA Telling Stories prose set text as narrative and language, covering structure, characterisation, point of view and style, and how to link named linguistic features to narrative effect for the closed-book exam.
- Studying the AQA Anthology: Paris as non-fiction, analysing how travel writing, memoir and journalism represent place, and preparing for unseen comparison in the exam.
How to study the AQA Anthology: Paris as non-fiction in Telling Stories, covering representation of place, the genres of travel writing, memoir and journalism, and the skill of comparing an anthology text with an unseen extract under exam conditions.