Skip to main content
EnglandEconomicsSyllabus dot point

How do economists measure how well an economy is performing?

The main macroeconomic objectives, the use of GDP and real and nominal values, index numbers, and other indicators of living standards and well-being.

An answer to AQA A-Level Economics 4.2.1, covering the main macroeconomic objectives, the use of GDP and real versus nominal values, index numbers, and other indicators of living standards and economic well-being.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.88 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. Macroeconomic objectives
  3. GDP and real versus nominal values
  4. Index numbers
  5. Indicators of living standards

What this dot point is asking

AQA wants you to identify the main macroeconomic objectives, explain the use of GDP and the difference between real and nominal values, use index numbers, and discuss other indicators of living standards and well-being. The real-versus-nominal calculation and the limitations of GDP recur every year.

Macroeconomic objectives

These objectives can conflict, which is the basis of much evaluation. Fast growth may raise inflation and pull in imports, worsening the balance of payments; cutting a deficit through austerity may raise unemployment. Policy therefore involves trade-offs, and the appropriate priority depends on the position in the cycle.

GDP and real versus nominal values

Only real changes show genuine growth: if nominal GDP rises 5 percent but prices rise 5 percent, real GDP is unchanged. To convert nominal to real, divide by a price index (the GDP deflator) and multiply by 100. GDP per capita (GDP divided by population) is needed to compare living standards, because total GDP can rise simply because the population grew. International comparisons use purchasing power parity to adjust for differences in the cost of living.

Index numbers

Index numbers make it easy to compare changes over time and are used for the price level (CPI), real GDP and many other series. To find the percentage change between two index values, apply newoldold×100\frac{\text{new} - \text{old}}{\text{old}} \times 100. An index of 120 means a 20 percent rise from the base, not a value of 120 percent.

Indicators of living standards

GDP per capita is the standard measure of average living standards, but it ignores the distribution of income, the informal economy and non-marketed activity (such as unpaid care), leisure time, and the environment and quality of public services. Wider measures include the Human Development Index (income, education and health), measures of subjective well-being (happiness) such as the ONS well-being survey, and indicators of income inequality such as the Gini coefficient. A balanced answer uses several indicators rather than GDP alone.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of AQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AQA 20184 marksNominal GDP rises by 6 percent in a year while the GDP deflator (price index) rises by 4 percent. Calculate the approximate rate of real GDP growth and explain why real GDP is the better measure.
Show worked answer →

A 4 mark question rewards the calculation and the reason.

Real growth. Approximately nominal growth minus inflation, 6%4%=2%6\% - 4\% = 2\%.

Why real is better. Nominal GDP rises when prices rise even if no extra output is produced; real GDP strips out price changes, so a 2 percent rise reflects a genuine increase in the quantity of goods and services.

Markers reward the 2 percent figure and the point that only real GDP measures actual output changes. Stronger answers note this is an approximation valid for small rates.

AQA 20219 marksAssess the usefulness of GDP per capita as a measure of living standards when comparing countries.
Show worked answer →

A 9 mark assessment question needs strengths, weaknesses and a judgement.

Strengths
Widely available, comparable (especially at purchasing power parity), and correlated with many development outcomes, so a useful first measure.
Weaknesses
Ignores income distribution, the informal and non-marketed economy, leisure, negative externalities and the quality of public services; an average can hide inequality.
Alternatives
The HDI, subjective well-being surveys and the Gini coefficient give a fuller picture.
Judgement
GDP per capita is a useful but partial measure; it should be combined with broader indicators. Markers reward balance and a supported conclusion.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this