Skip to main content
EnglandMusicSyllabus dot point

How do you plan and write the 12-mark Section B extended comparison?

The Component 3 Section B extended-response question (12 marks): comparing and evaluating a set work with an unfamiliar piece across the musical elements, structuring a balanced, evaluative answer that reaches a conclusion.

A focused answer to the Edexcel GCSE Music Component 3 Section B extended-response question, covering how to compare and evaluate a set work with an unfamiliar piece across the musical elements, structure a balanced comparison, use the score, and reach an evaluative conclusion for the 12-mark question.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.812 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. What Section B asks
  3. Plan before you write
  4. Write comparative, not separate, paragraphs
  5. Reach an evaluative conclusion
  6. How Edexcel examines this
  7. Try this

What this dot point is asking

Section B is a single extended-response question worth 12 marks, the biggest question on the paper. It asks you to compare and evaluate a set work with an unfamiliar piece (related to one of the set works), referring to the scores and what you hear. It is marked by levels for both musical knowledge and the quality of comparison and evaluation, so structure and judgement matter as much as content.

What Section B asks

Plan before you write

Write comparative, not separate, paragraphs

Reach an evaluative conclusion

How Edexcel examines this

Section B is marked using levels of response, assessing both knowledge and understanding and the quality of evaluation and conclusion. The mark scheme rewards sustained, balanced comparison, accurate element vocabulary, use of the scores, and a justified judgement. It penalises two separate descriptions and answers that list without evaluating. Practise by comparing each set work with a wider-listening piece, planning with the element grid and writing a judged conclusion, against the timing.

Try this

Q1. How many marks is Section B worth, and what does it ask you to do? [Knowledge recall]

  • Cue. 12 marks; compare and evaluate a set work with a related unfamiliar piece across the musical elements.

Q2. What turns a comparison into a top-band Section B answer? [Short explanation]

  • Cue. An evaluative conclusion, a justified judgement of which piece uses the elements more effectively and why, alongside balanced, sustained comparison.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of Pearson Edexcel exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

Edexcel 202012 marksCompare and evaluate the musical elements of one set work with the unfamiliar piece provided. You should refer to the scores and what you have heard. (Component 3, Section B extended response)
Show worked answer →

Twelve marks, marked by levels for knowledge and understanding and for the quality of comparison and evaluation. A top-band answer compares both extracts element by element (melody, instrumentation, texture, tonality, harmony, rhythm, dynamics, structure), putting both pieces in the same point with comparative language, uses precise vocabulary and the scores (bar references), and reaches a clear evaluative conclusion (which uses the elements more effectively, and why). Markers reward sustained, balanced comparison and a justified judgement, not two separate descriptions or a list without evaluation.

Edexcel 202212 marksEvaluate how the set work and the unfamiliar piece each use musical elements to create their effect or mood, comparing the two. (Component 3, Section B extended response)
Show worked answer →

Twelve marks by levels. Plan with the elements, then write comparative paragraphs that judge how each piece achieves its effect: for example, how each creates drama, mood or energy through tonality, dynamics, texture and instrumentation, drawing genuine similarities and differences and supporting points from the scores. Conclude with an evaluative judgement about which is more effective and why. Markers reward the quality of evaluation and conclusion as well as accurate musical knowledge, so the answer must judge, not just describe both pieces.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this