Skip to main content
EnglandBusinessSyllabus dot point

Why do businesses train staff, and what does it cost them?

The purpose of training, the difference between induction, on-the-job and off-the-job training, the benefits and drawbacks of training to the business and the employee, and the link between development and motivation.

A focused answer to AQA GCSE Business 3.4.3, covering the purpose of training, induction, on-the-job and off-the-job training, the benefits and drawbacks of training, and the link to motivation.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.86 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The purpose of training
  3. Types of training
  4. Benefits and drawbacks
  5. The link to motivation
  6. Try this

What this dot point is asking

AQA wants you to explain why businesses train staff, distinguish induction, on-the-job and off-the-job training, weigh the benefits and drawbacks for the business and the employee, and link development to motivation.

The purpose of training

Training improves productivity, quality and safety, and helps staff cope with new technology and methods. A business trains staff for several reasons: to bring new recruits up to speed, to keep skills current as technology and the law change, to reduce errors and accidents, and to prepare staff for promotion. The benefit is not only sharper skills but also motivation, because investing in someone signals that the business values them. The cost side, which AQA wants you to weigh, is the money and the time spent away from productive work, plus the risk that a newly trained worker leaves for a rival, taking the investment with them. Most businesses judge that the productivity and quality gains outweigh these costs, especially where skills change quickly.

Types of training

Benefits and drawbacks

Training and development motivate staff by giving them new skills, more confidence and the chance of promotion, which makes them feel valued and more likely to stay. This links back to the cost of staff turnover: a business that develops its people is more likely to keep them, saving on repeated recruitment. The choice of training method depends on the skill being taught. Routine, job-specific tasks suit cheap, relevant on-the-job training; specialist or safety-critical skills, or recognised qualifications, often need off-the-job training despite the higher cost and the worker's absence. A strong exam answer matches the method to the skill rather than picking one as always best.

Try this

Q1. State what induction training is. [1 mark]

  • Cue. Training given to new employees to introduce them to the business.

Q2. Explain one drawback to a business of training its staff. [2 marks]

  • Cue. It costs money and time, and trained staff may leave for a competitor.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of AQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AQA 20182 marksOutline one benefit to an employee of receiving training. (Paper 1, Section B)
Show worked answer →

A 2-mark outline question: a benefit with a brief development.

One benefit is that training gives the employee new skills and qualifications, which makes them more confident in their role and improves their chances of promotion. This can lead to higher pay and greater job satisfaction.

Markers reward an employee-focused benefit (new skills, confidence, promotion, higher pay, job satisfaction) plus a brief consequence. Naming a benefit with no development scores one mark. The trap is giving a benefit to the business instead of the employee.

AQA 20219 marksA manufacturing business is deciding whether to use on-the-job or off-the-job training for its production staff. Justify which method the business should choose. (Paper 1, Section C)
Show worked answer →

A 9-mark justify question: choose, apply, weigh the alternative.

Case for on-the-job: it is cheaper and directly relevant, as staff learn the actual machines and methods while working, so production continues and the skills transfer immediately. This suits routine production tasks.

Case for off-the-job: it brings in specialist knowledge and qualifications and avoids disrupting the production line, but it costs more and the worker is absent. A supported judgement might recommend on-the-job training for routine production roles because it is cheaper and keeps output going, while using off-the-job training where specialist skills or safety qualifications are needed. The decision should turn on the complexity of the skill. Markers reward a clear choice justified against the alternative and applied to the manufacturer.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this