Skip to main content
EnglandBusinessSyllabus dot point

How do businesses judge whether to enter a country, as a market or a base?

The factors a business assesses when judging a country as a market or as a production location, including market size and growth, incomes, infrastructure, costs, skills, political stability and risk, and the use of this analysis in deciding whether and how to expand.

A focused answer to the OCR A-Level Business global theme on assessing a country, covering the factors a business judges when treating a country as a market or as a production location, including market size and growth, incomes, infrastructure, costs, skills, political stability and risk.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.811 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this theme is asking
  2. Assessing a country as a market
  3. Assessing a country as a production location
  4. Using the analysis to decide whether and how to expand
  5. Examples in context
  6. Try this

What this theme is asking

OCR wants you to explain the factors a business weighs when judging a country either as a market (somewhere to sell) or as a production location (somewhere to make), and how this analysis informs the decision to expand and how to do it. This is a frequent Component 3 evaluation topic.

Assessing a country as a market

The crucial nuance is that population is not the same as a market. A country of 100 million people is only a large market for a product if enough of them have the income to buy it. So a firm looks at incomes and their distribution, not just headcount, to size the realistic, affordable segment.

Assessing a country as a production location

A common trap firms fall into is chasing the lowest labour cost without checking infrastructure, skills and stability. A very cheap location with frequent power cuts, poor transport and an unskilled workforce can prove a false economy, because production is unreliable and the hidden costs mount.

Using the analysis to decide whether and how to expand

The assessment informs both whether to enter and how. A large, growing, accessible market with manageable risk may justify direct entry; a risky, unfamiliar market may be better entered cautiously through a joint venture with a local partner (sharing knowledge and risk) or by exporting first. A strong production location may justify offshoring the firm's own plant; a riskier one may favour outsourcing to a local firm. The country analysis and the entry-method choice go together.

Examples in context

Western firms have targeted emerging economies such as those in Asia for their fast-growing middle classes, while recognising that headline population overstates the affordable market. Manufacturers have chosen production locations on a mix of low cost and adequate infrastructure and skills, sometimes reshoring when cheap locations proved unreliable or when wages rose. Many firms enter unfamiliar, higher-risk markets through joint ventures to gain local knowledge and share the risk.

Try this

Q1. State two factors a firm should consider when assessing a country as a production location. [2 marks]

  • Cue. Labour and land costs, infrastructure, workforce skills, proximity to markets or materials, exchange-rate risk, or political stability.

Q2. Analyse why a large population alone does not make a country a good market. [6 marks]

  • Cue. A product is only affordable to those with sufficient income, so the firm must assess income levels and distribution to find the realistic market, developed as a chain in context.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of OCR exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

OCR H431/03 20226 marksAnalyse two factors a UK business should consider when assessing an emerging economy as a market for its products. (6)
Show worked answer →

A Component 3 "Analyse" rewards two developed chains in context. Factor one, market size and growth: a large and fast-growing population with rising incomes means strong potential demand, so the firm could win many new customers and grow sales, justifying entry. Factor two, incomes and ability to pay: even a large population only forms a viable market if enough people can afford the product, so the firm must check income levels and distribution before committing. Markers reward two distinct factors, each developed into a chain (large growing market leads to sales potential; income levels determine affordability and the viable segment), anchored in context. Other valid factors include infrastructure, competition and political risk.

OCR H431/03 202416 marksEvaluate the factors a UK manufacturer should consider when choosing an overseas country as a production location. (16)
Show worked answer →

A 16-mark evaluation on a four-level grid. Build chains around the main factors. Costs: lower labour and land costs can cut unit cost and raise competitiveness, a key attraction. Infrastructure and skills: good transport, power and a skilled workforce are essential for efficient production, so a cheap location with poor infrastructure may be a false economy. Political stability and risk: instability, corruption or weak rule of law raise the risk to the investment. Proximity to markets or materials and exchange-rate risk also matter. Chain: low labour cost lowers unit cost, but only if infrastructure supports reliable production. Evaluation: the best location balances cost against reliability and risk; the cheapest country is rarely the best if infrastructure, skills or stability are weak. A judged conclusion reaches the top band.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this