Why do girls now outperform boys, and why do achievement and experience vary by ethnicity?
Component 1 Section C (Education): gender differences in achievement (the changing position of girls and boys, and subject choice) and ethnic differences in achievement, including external and internal explanations and the experience of different ethnic groups in school.
An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Education guide to gender and ethnicity. Covers the reasons girls now outperform boys (feminism, changing ambitions, the decline of male jobs, laddish subcultures) and gendered subject choice, plus external and internal explanations of ethnic differences in achievement and the experience of ethnic groups in school.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
This statement covers gender and ethnic differences in achievement: why girls now outperform boys, the persistence of gendered subject choice, and the external and internal explanations of ethnic differences and the experience of ethnic groups in school. The recurring skill is using external (home, society) and internal (school) factors, and being cautious about explanations that risk stereotyping.
The answer
Gender: why girls now outperform boys
Girls now outperform boys at most levels, reversing the historic pattern. The reasons divide into the rise of girls and the relative decline of boys:
- External (girls): feminism and changing ambitions (Sharpe's research found girls shifted from prioritising marriage and family to careers and independence), more job opportunities for women, and changes in family and women's employment raised girls' motivation.
- External (boys): the decline of traditional male manual jobs (sometimes called a crisis of masculinity) has, some argue, reduced the incentive for boys to achieve, while laddish anti-school subcultures equate effort with being uncool.
- Internal: girls may benefit from coursework, more positive teacher attention, and the feminisation of teaching; boys' weaker literacy is also significant.
Subject choice remains gendered: girls are over-represented in the humanities, languages and caring subjects and boys in sciences, maths and technology. This reflects gender role socialisation, gender domains (what each sex sees as their territory), gendered subject images and peer pressure, rather than ability.
Ethnicity: external and internal explanations
Achievement and experience also vary by ethnicity, with different patterns for different groups. Explanations again split:
- External factors: material deprivation (some minority ethnic groups face higher rates of poverty) and cultural factors (family structure, parental attitudes, language if English is an additional language). These explanations are contested and risk stereotyping whole groups, and class often underlies them.
- Internal factors: labelling and teacher racism (low expectations of some groups), an ethnocentric curriculum (one that prioritises white, Western culture), and pupil responses. Sewell studied the labelling of black boys and their varied responses, while Gillborn and Youdell described an "educational triage" in which schools sort pupils and can disadvantage certain ethnic groups.
A crucial point is that class frequently underlies apparent ethnic differences, so the two cannot be separated cleanly.
Handling the explanations carefully
Both gender and ethnic explanations require caution: blanket claims about a group's culture risk stereotyping and blaming the victim. The strongest answers show external disadvantage and internal school processes interacting, and recognise that class cuts across both gender and ethnicity.
Examples in context
A strong answer separates external from internal factors for both gender and ethnicity, names studies (Sharpe, Sewell, Gillborn and Youdell), and avoids stereotyping by stressing that class cuts across both.
Try this
Q1. Explain what is meant by 'gender domains' in subject choice. [6 marks]
- What the marker wants. A definition (AO1): gender domains are the areas of activity and knowledge that boys and girls come to see as their "territory" through socialisation, shaping subject choice (for example science seen as masculine, caring subjects as feminine), with an example.
Q2. Analyse two reasons why girls now achieve more highly than boys. [12 marks]
- Cue. Two developed points chosen from changing female ambitions and feminism (Sharpe), more job opportunities for women, the decline of traditional male jobs and laddish subcultures, and the suitability of coursework, each explained and linked to the reversal of the gender gap.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of WJEC Eduqas exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
Eduqas A200 20186 marksExplain two reasons why girls now achieve more highly than boys in education. [6]Show worked answer →
A short Section C knowledge question (AO1 with application, three marks per reason). Identify a reason and develop it.
Reason one. Changing female ambitions: feminism and more job opportunities have raised girls' aspirations (Sharpe's research shows a shift from marriage to careers), motivating achievement.
Reason two. The decline of traditional male jobs and laddish subcultures: as manual jobs disappear, some boys lose motivation, and anti-school masculine subcultures discourage effort. Developing each reason secures the marks.
Eduqas A200 202020 marksEvaluate explanations of ethnic differences in educational achievement. [20]Show worked answer →
A Section C essay (AO1, AO2 and AO3), shown at the 20-mark cap (worth more in the full paper), marked by levels of response.
For external. Material deprivation (some minority groups face higher poverty) and cultural factors (family structure, language) are used to explain differences, though these explanations are contested and risk stereotyping.
For internal. Labelling and teacher racism, ethnocentric curriculum, and pupil responses (Sewell, Gillborn and Youdell's "educational triage") show the school shapes outcomes.
Judgement. Ethnic differences are best explained by the interaction of external disadvantage with internal racism and labelling, and class often underlies apparent ethnic gaps. A balanced judgement reaches the top band.
Related dot points
- Component 1 Section C (Education): perspectives on the role and purpose of education, including functionalist views (Durkheim, Parsons, Davis and Moore), Marxist views (Althusser, Bowles and Gintis, Willis) and the New Right, with their criticisms.
An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Education guide to the role of education. Covers functionalist views (Durkheim on solidarity, Parsons on meritocracy, Davis and Moore on role allocation), Marxist views (Althusser's ideological state apparatus, Bowles and Gintis's correspondence principle, Willis's lads), and the New Right, with criticisms.
- Component 1 Section C (Education): social class differences in educational achievement, including external factors (material deprivation, cultural deprivation, cultural capital) and internal factors (labelling, the self-fulfilling prophecy, streaming and pupil subcultures).
An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Education guide to social class and achievement. Covers external factors (material deprivation, cultural deprivation, Bourdieu's cultural capital, language codes) and internal factors (labelling, the self-fulfilling prophecy, streaming and the A-to-C economy), with the debate over whether the cause lies inside or outside school.
- Component 1 Section C (Education): processes within school, including the hidden curriculum, teacher labelling and the self-fulfilling prophecy, streaming and setting, and pupil identities and subcultures (pro-school and anti-school responses).
An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Education guide to in-school processes. Covers the hidden curriculum, teacher labelling and the self-fulfilling prophecy, streaming and setting, differentiation and polarisation, and pro-school and anti-school pupil subcultures (Willis, Lacey, Ball), with the interactionist view of school the paper rewards.
- Component 1 Section C (Education): educational policy, including the tripartite system, comprehensivisation, marketisation and parental choice (the 1988 Education Reform Act), selection and the impact of policy on equality of opportunity and on different social groups.
An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Education guide to policy. Covers the tripartite system, comprehensivisation, marketisation and parental choice (the 1988 Education Reform Act, league tables, formula funding), selection (cream-skimming, the A-to-C economy), and the impact of policy on equality of opportunity for different social groups.
- Component 3 Section A: patterns and trends in social inequality, including the distribution of wealth and income, the measurement and definition of poverty, social mobility, and explanations of why inequality and poverty persist.
An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Power and Stratification guide to patterns of inequality. Covers the distribution of wealth and income, absolute and relative poverty and how it is measured, social mobility, the cycle of deprivation versus structural and cultural explanations, and why inequality and poverty persist.
Sources & how we know this
- Eduqas A Level Sociology Specification (A200) — Eduqas (2015)