Why do working-class pupils tend to achieve less, and how far is the cause inside or outside school?
Component 1 Section C (Education): social class differences in educational achievement, including external factors (material deprivation, cultural deprivation, cultural capital) and internal factors (labelling, the self-fulfilling prophecy, streaming and pupil subcultures).
An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Education guide to social class and achievement. Covers external factors (material deprivation, cultural deprivation, Bourdieu's cultural capital, language codes) and internal factors (labelling, the self-fulfilling prophecy, streaming and the A-to-C economy), with the debate over whether the cause lies inside or outside school.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
This statement is about social class differences in achievement: the persistent gap between working-class and middle-class attainment, and whether its causes lie outside school (material and cultural factors) or inside it (labelling and school processes). You need the external factors (material deprivation, cultural deprivation, cultural capital, language codes) and the internal factors (labelling, the self-fulfilling prophecy, streaming, pupil subcultures), and the debate about which matters more.
The answer
External factors
- Material deprivation: poverty limits achievement through poor housing (nowhere to study, ill health), inability to afford resources (books, computers, trips, uniform), and the pull of part-time work. Material disadvantage starts before school and accumulates.
- Cultural deprivation (a contested idea): the claim that some working-class homes lack the values (such as deferred gratification), knowledge and parental involvement that schools reward. Critics argue this blames the victim and ignores material causes.
- Bernstein's language codes: working-class pupils may rely on a restricted code (context-bound, informal), while schools use the elaborated code (formal, explicit) of the middle class, putting working-class pupils at a disadvantage.
- Bourdieu's cultural capital: schools take middle-class culture (knowledge, language, tastes, confidence) as the norm and reward it, so middle-class pupils arrive with an advantage and working-class pupils with a deficit, helping reproduce class inequality.
Internal factors
- Labelling: teachers attach labels based on class assumptions. Becker found teachers judged pupils against an image of the "ideal pupil", often a middle-class one, so working-class pupils were labelled less favourably.
- The self-fulfilling prophecy: a label can come true because pupils internalise it. Rosenthal and Jacobson ("Pygmalion in the Classroom") showed that pupils teachers expected to do well subsequently did, regardless of actual ability.
- Streaming and setting: placing pupils in ability groups can trap working-class pupils in lower sets with lower expectations. Some link this to an A-to-C economy in which schools focus resources on borderline pupils.
- Pupil subcultures: pupils respond to labelling and streaming by forming pro-school or anti-school subcultures (Lacey's differentiation and polarisation; Ball), which then amplify the original differences.
The debate
The key evaluation is whether class differences are mainly caused by external or internal factors. External theorists stress disadvantage rooted in poverty and home culture; internal theorists stress that the school itself labels and sorts pupils. Most sociologists conclude the two interact: external disadvantage is reinforced by internal school processes, so neither alone explains the gap.
Examples in context
A strong answer keeps external and internal factors clearly separated, names studies (Bourdieu, Bernstein, Becker, Rosenthal and Jacobson, Ball), and concludes that the factors interact.
Try this
Q1. Explain what is meant by the 'self-fulfilling prophecy' in education. [6 marks]
- What the marker wants. A definition (AO1): the self-fulfilling prophecy is when a label or expectation (for example a teacher's belief that a pupil will do well or badly) causes the pupil to behave in line with it, making it come true (Rosenthal and Jacobson), with an example.
Q2. Analyse two external factors that may explain working-class underachievement. [12 marks]
- Cue. Two developed points chosen from material deprivation (poverty, housing, lack of resources), cultural deprivation, Bernstein's restricted code and Bourdieu's lack of cultural capital, each explained and linked to how it disadvantages working-class pupils before or beyond school.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of WJEC Eduqas exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
Eduqas A200 20196 marksExplain what is meant by 'cultural capital'. [6]Show worked answer →
A short Section C knowledge question (AO1 with application). Define and develop.
Definition. Cultural capital is Bourdieu's term for the knowledge, language, tastes and attitudes of the middle class that schools value and reward.
Development. Because schools take middle-class culture as the norm, middle-class pupils have an advantage, while working-class pupils are at a disadvantage, helping reproduce class inequality. Naming Bourdieu and giving an example secures the marks.
Eduqas A200 202120 marksEvaluate the view that external factors are the main cause of social class differences in achievement. [20]Show worked answer →
A Section C essay (AO1, AO2 and AO3), shown at the 20-mark cap (worth more in the full paper), marked by levels of response.
For external. Material deprivation (poverty, housing, lack of resources) and cultural factors (cultural deprivation, restricted language codes, lack of cultural capital, Bourdieu) limit working-class achievement before school.
For internal. Labelling, the self-fulfilling prophecy, streaming and pupil subcultures (Becker, Rosenthal and Jacobson, Ball) show the school itself shapes achievement.
Judgement. Both matter and interact: external factors create disadvantage that internal processes then reinforce, so neither alone explains the gap. A balanced judgement reaches the top band.
Related dot points
- Component 1 Section C (Education): perspectives on the role and purpose of education, including functionalist views (Durkheim, Parsons, Davis and Moore), Marxist views (Althusser, Bowles and Gintis, Willis) and the New Right, with their criticisms.
An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Education guide to the role of education. Covers functionalist views (Durkheim on solidarity, Parsons on meritocracy, Davis and Moore on role allocation), Marxist views (Althusser's ideological state apparatus, Bowles and Gintis's correspondence principle, Willis's lads), and the New Right, with criticisms.
- Component 1 Section C (Education): gender differences in achievement (the changing position of girls and boys, and subject choice) and ethnic differences in achievement, including external and internal explanations and the experience of different ethnic groups in school.
An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Education guide to gender and ethnicity. Covers the reasons girls now outperform boys (feminism, changing ambitions, the decline of male jobs, laddish subcultures) and gendered subject choice, plus external and internal explanations of ethnic differences in achievement and the experience of ethnic groups in school.
- Component 1 Section C (Education): processes within school, including the hidden curriculum, teacher labelling and the self-fulfilling prophecy, streaming and setting, and pupil identities and subcultures (pro-school and anti-school responses).
An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Education guide to in-school processes. Covers the hidden curriculum, teacher labelling and the self-fulfilling prophecy, streaming and setting, differentiation and polarisation, and pro-school and anti-school pupil subcultures (Willis, Lacey, Ball), with the interactionist view of school the paper rewards.
- Component 1 Section C (Education): educational policy, including the tripartite system, comprehensivisation, marketisation and parental choice (the 1988 Education Reform Act), selection and the impact of policy on equality of opportunity and on different social groups.
An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Education guide to policy. Covers the tripartite system, comprehensivisation, marketisation and parental choice (the 1988 Education Reform Act, league tables, formula funding), selection (cream-skimming, the A-to-C economy), and the impact of policy on equality of opportunity for different social groups.
- Component 3 Section A: patterns and trends in social inequality, including the distribution of wealth and income, the measurement and definition of poverty, social mobility, and explanations of why inequality and poverty persist.
An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Power and Stratification guide to patterns of inequality. Covers the distribution of wealth and income, absolute and relative poverty and how it is measured, social mobility, the cycle of deprivation versus structural and cultural explanations, and why inequality and poverty persist.
Sources & how we know this
- Eduqas A Level Sociology Specification (A200) — Eduqas (2015)