Skip to main content
EnglandSociologySyllabus dot point

Why do working-class pupils tend to achieve less, and how far is the cause inside or outside school?

Component 1 Section C (Education): social class differences in educational achievement, including external factors (material deprivation, cultural deprivation, cultural capital) and internal factors (labelling, the self-fulfilling prophecy, streaming and pupil subcultures).

An Eduqas A-Level Sociology Education guide to social class and achievement. Covers external factors (material deprivation, cultural deprivation, Bourdieu's cultural capital, language codes) and internal factors (labelling, the self-fulfilling prophecy, streaming and the A-to-C economy), with the debate over whether the cause lies inside or outside school.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.815 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

This statement is about social class differences in achievement: the persistent gap between working-class and middle-class attainment, and whether its causes lie outside school (material and cultural factors) or inside it (labelling and school processes). You need the external factors (material deprivation, cultural deprivation, cultural capital, language codes) and the internal factors (labelling, the self-fulfilling prophecy, streaming, pupil subcultures), and the debate about which matters more.

The answer

External factors

  • Material deprivation: poverty limits achievement through poor housing (nowhere to study, ill health), inability to afford resources (books, computers, trips, uniform), and the pull of part-time work. Material disadvantage starts before school and accumulates.
  • Cultural deprivation (a contested idea): the claim that some working-class homes lack the values (such as deferred gratification), knowledge and parental involvement that schools reward. Critics argue this blames the victim and ignores material causes.
  • Bernstein's language codes: working-class pupils may rely on a restricted code (context-bound, informal), while schools use the elaborated code (formal, explicit) of the middle class, putting working-class pupils at a disadvantage.
  • Bourdieu's cultural capital: schools take middle-class culture (knowledge, language, tastes, confidence) as the norm and reward it, so middle-class pupils arrive with an advantage and working-class pupils with a deficit, helping reproduce class inequality.

Internal factors

  • Labelling: teachers attach labels based on class assumptions. Becker found teachers judged pupils against an image of the "ideal pupil", often a middle-class one, so working-class pupils were labelled less favourably.
  • The self-fulfilling prophecy: a label can come true because pupils internalise it. Rosenthal and Jacobson ("Pygmalion in the Classroom") showed that pupils teachers expected to do well subsequently did, regardless of actual ability.
  • Streaming and setting: placing pupils in ability groups can trap working-class pupils in lower sets with lower expectations. Some link this to an A-to-C economy in which schools focus resources on borderline pupils.
  • Pupil subcultures: pupils respond to labelling and streaming by forming pro-school or anti-school subcultures (Lacey's differentiation and polarisation; Ball), which then amplify the original differences.

The debate

The key evaluation is whether class differences are mainly caused by external or internal factors. External theorists stress disadvantage rooted in poverty and home culture; internal theorists stress that the school itself labels and sorts pupils. Most sociologists conclude the two interact: external disadvantage is reinforced by internal school processes, so neither alone explains the gap.

Examples in context

A strong answer keeps external and internal factors clearly separated, names studies (Bourdieu, Bernstein, Becker, Rosenthal and Jacobson, Ball), and concludes that the factors interact.

Try this

Q1. Explain what is meant by the 'self-fulfilling prophecy' in education. [6 marks]

  • What the marker wants. A definition (AO1): the self-fulfilling prophecy is when a label or expectation (for example a teacher's belief that a pupil will do well or badly) causes the pupil to behave in line with it, making it come true (Rosenthal and Jacobson), with an example.

Q2. Analyse two external factors that may explain working-class underachievement. [12 marks]

  • Cue. Two developed points chosen from material deprivation (poverty, housing, lack of resources), cultural deprivation, Bernstein's restricted code and Bourdieu's lack of cultural capital, each explained and linked to how it disadvantages working-class pupils before or beyond school.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of WJEC Eduqas exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

Eduqas A200 20196 marksExplain what is meant by 'cultural capital'. [6]
Show worked answer →

A short Section C knowledge question (AO1 with application). Define and develop.

Definition. Cultural capital is Bourdieu's term for the knowledge, language, tastes and attitudes of the middle class that schools value and reward.

Development. Because schools take middle-class culture as the norm, middle-class pupils have an advantage, while working-class pupils are at a disadvantage, helping reproduce class inequality. Naming Bourdieu and giving an example secures the marks.

Eduqas A200 202120 marksEvaluate the view that external factors are the main cause of social class differences in achievement. [20]
Show worked answer →

A Section C essay (AO1, AO2 and AO3), shown at the 20-mark cap (worth more in the full paper), marked by levels of response.

For external. Material deprivation (poverty, housing, lack of resources) and cultural factors (cultural deprivation, restricted language codes, lack of cultural capital, Bourdieu) limit working-class achievement before school.

For internal. Labelling, the self-fulfilling prophecy, streaming and pupil subcultures (Becker, Rosenthal and Jacobson, Ball) show the school itself shapes achievement.

Judgement. Both matter and interact: external factors create disadvantage that internal processes then reinforce, so neither alone explains the gap. A balanced judgement reaches the top band.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this