Skip to main content
EnglandLegal StudiesSyllabus dot point

What are the terms of a contract, how are they classified, and when can a party exclude liability?

The terms of a contract: express and implied terms (including statutory implied terms), the classification of terms (conditions, warranties and innominate terms), and exclusion clauses and their statutory controls.

An Eduqas A-Level Law guide to the terms of a contract. Explains express and implied terms, conditions, warranties and innominate terms, and exclusion clauses and their controls, with worked scenario answers and the AO2 application the paper rewards.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.817 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

Eduqas contract requires you to know the terms of a contract: express and implied terms (including statutory implied terms), the classification of terms (conditions, warranties and innominate terms), and exclusion clauses and their statutory controls. The skill is to classify a term and apply the right remedy, and to assess an exclusion clause on a scenario (AO2), and to evaluate the controls (AO3).

The answer

Express and implied terms

Statutory implied terms

Important terms are implied by statute to protect quality. In a consumer contract the Consumer Rights Act 2015 implies that goods are of satisfactory quality (s9), fit for purpose (s10) and as described (s11), and that a service is performed with reasonable care and skill (s49). In business-to-business sales the Sale of Goods Act 1979 implies similar terms.

Classifying terms

Exclusion clauses and their controls

An exclusion (exemption) clause seeks to exclude or limit liability. The courts apply a three-stage test. First, the clause must be incorporated: by signature (binding even if unread, L'Estrange v Graucob), by reasonable notice given at or before contracting (a notice in a hotel room after booking is too late, Olley v Marlborough Court; an onerous clause needs extra prominence, Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking), or by a course of dealing. Second, on its true construction the clause must cover the breach, ambiguity being construed against the party relying on it (contra proferentem). Third, it must survive the statutory controls: under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 a clause excluding liability for death or personal injury caused by negligence is void, and others are valid only if reasonable; under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 consumer terms must be fair and transparent, and the statutory rights cannot be excluded.

Examples in context

A strong answer classifies the term and runs the three-stage exclusion-clause test in order.

Try this

Q1. Explain the difference between a condition, a warranty and an innominate term. [10 marks]

  • What the marker wants. Precise AO1: a condition is a major term allowing termination and damages (Poussard); a warranty is a minor term allowing damages only (Bettini); an innominate term's remedy depends on the seriousness of the actual breach (Hong Kong Fir).

Q2. A dry cleaner's ticket, handed over after the customer leaves the clothes, contains a clause excluding all liability for damage. The clothes are ruined. Advise on whether the cleaner can rely on the clause. [20 marks]

  • Cue. An AO2 application: the clause must be incorporated by reasonable notice given at or before contracting; a clause on a ticket handed over after the contract is made may be too late (Olley; Thornton), and the Consumer Rights Act 2015 controls fairness, so the cleaner is unlikely to be able to rely on it.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of WJEC Eduqas exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

Eduqas Component 2 2022 (scenario)20 marksAn opera singer is contracted to perform for a season but misses the first three nights due to illness; a chorus member misses some rehearsals. Advise the producer on whether he can terminate each contract. [a scenario in the style of Component 2; the real paper tariff is 25, AO1 and AO2]
Show worked answer →

A mainly AO2 scenario on conditions and warranties.

The lead singer (a condition). Attending the opening nights goes to the root of the contract, so it is a condition (Poussard v Spiers). Breach of a condition allows the producer to terminate and claim damages. Missing the first three nights is a serious breach, so the producer may end the lead's contract.

The chorus member (a warranty). Attending some early rehearsals is a minor term, a warranty (Bettini v Gye). Breach of a warranty allows damages only, not termination, so the producer cannot dismiss the chorus member, only claim any loss.

Innominate terms. If the classification is unclear, the court asks whether the breach deprived the producer of substantially the whole benefit (Hong Kong Fir): a serious effect is treated like a condition, a minor one like a warranty.

A top answer classifies each term and applies the correct remedy, using Poussard and Bettini.

Eduqas Component 3 2021 (essay)20 marksAnalyse and evaluate the statutory controls on exclusion clauses. [an essay in the style of Component 3; the real paper tariff is 25, AO1 and AO3]
Show worked answer →

A mainly AO3 essay. Explain the common law and statutory controls, then evaluate them.

The law. An exclusion clause must be incorporated (by signature, L'Estrange v Graucob; reasonable notice, Olley v Marlborough Court; or a course of dealing) and must, on its true construction, cover the breach (the contra proferentem rule). It must then survive statute: the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (which makes clauses excluding liability for negligently caused death or personal injury void, and others subject to reasonableness) and the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (which protects consumers, requires fairness and transparency, and bars exclusion of the statutory rights as to goods and services).

Evaluation. Strengths: the layered controls protect the weaker party, especially consumers, while allowing freedom of contract between businesses; the reasonableness and fairness tests are flexible. Weaknesses: the law was complex and split between two regimes before the 2015 Act consolidated consumer protection; reasonableness is uncertain; and small businesses may still be vulnerable.

A top answer explains incorporation, construction and the statutes, and evaluates how well they balance protection and freedom, then concludes.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this