Skip to main content
EnglandLegal StudiesSyllabus dot point

How do you use cases and statutes as authority accurately and to best effect in an answer?

Using cases and statutes accurately: citing the relevant statute (and section) and the leading case by name, stating the legal principle correctly, knowing when authority has been overruled or amended, and deploying authority across all assessment objectives.

An Eduqas A-Level Law guide to using cases and statutes accurately. Explains how to cite the relevant statute and case, state the principle correctly, track overruling and amendment, and deploy authority across the assessment objectives, with worked examples.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.815 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

This skill underpins every answer in all three components. Whatever the command word, a legal point should be supported by authority: the relevant statute (with the section where possible) or the leading case by name, stated and used accurately. Authority is rewarded across AO1, AO2 and AO3, so it is the single biggest signal of a strong answer.

The answer

Why authority matters

Citing statutes and cases accurately

To use authority accurately: name the statute and, where you can, the section (for example s20 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, or s52 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009); and name the leading case (for example Adomako for gross negligence manslaughter, Hadley v Baxendale for remoteness in contract). You do not need the full citation or year for every case, but the name and the principle must be correct. A vague or wrong principle, or a case used for the wrong point, undermines the argument.

Ratio, obiter and changed law

Deploying authority across the objectives

Authority is rewarded across all three assessment objectives. For AO1, citing the right statute or case demonstrates knowledge. For AO2, applying a named authority to the facts makes the application persuasive ("the deep cut is a wound under Eisenhower, so section 20 applies"). For AO3, authority and reform proposals provide the evidence for an evaluation ("the inconsistency between s47 and s20, both carrying five years, supports the Law Commission's call for reform"). In every case, name the authority, state the principle, and use it; never drop a bare list of case names with no explanation.

Examples in context

A strong answer names, states and uses each authority, and never relies on superseded law.

Try this

Q1. Explain why authority is essential in a legal answer and how it should be cited. [10 marks]

  • What the marker wants. Precise AO1: authority (statutes and cases) supports every legal point and is rewarded across all assessment objectives; cite the statute (with the section where possible) and the case by name, state the principle accurately, and use current law.

Q2. Explain, with examples, the importance of knowing when a case or statute has been overruled or amended. [16 marks]

  • Cue. An AO1 answer: the law changes, so citing superseded authority is an error; give examples (Ivey replacing Ghosh on dishonesty; R v G replacing Caldwell on recklessness; the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 replacing provocation with loss of control), and explain that accurate, current authority is what gives an answer credibility.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of WJEC Eduqas exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

Eduqas Component 2 2022 (scenario)16 marksExplain why authority (cases and statutes) is essential in a legal answer, and how it should be used accurately. [a method question in the style of Component 2, AO1 and AO2]
Show worked answer →

A method answer about the use of authority.

Why it is essential. Authority turns an assertion into a legal argument; an answer that states a rule without a case or statute is weaker. Authority is rewarded across AO1 (knowledge), AO2 (application) and AO3 (evaluation).

How to use it accurately. Name the statute (and the section where possible, for example s47 OAPA 1861) and the leading case (for example Donoghue v Stevenson), state the principle correctly, and apply it to the facts. Know when authority has changed (Ivey replacing Ghosh on dishonesty; R v G replacing Caldwell on recklessness), so you do not cite overruled law.

A top answer explains the role of authority and shows how to cite and apply it accurately, with examples of changed law.

Eduqas Component 3 2021 (essay)16 marksExplain the difference between the ratio decidendi and obiter dicta of a case and why it matters when using authority. [a method question in the style of Component 3, AO1]
Show worked answer →

A method AO1 answer linking authority to precedent.

The distinction. The ratio decidendi is the legal reasoning essential to the decision and is the binding part of a case; obiter dicta are remarks made by the way and are only persuasive.

Why it matters. When you cite a case as authority, you are relying on its ratio. Using an obiter statement as if it were binding, or stating the ratio inaccurately, weakens the argument. For example, the duty of care principle in Donoghue v Stevenson is its ratio; wider comments are obiter.

A top answer defines ratio and obiter and explains that accurate use of authority means relying on the ratio and stating it correctly.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this