Skip to main content
EnglandPsychologySyllabus dot point

How do early attachments shape development, and what happens when they are disrupted?

Child psychology: attachment theory (Bowlby) and types (Ainsworth's Strange Situation), the role of the father, deprivation, privation and institutionalisation, day care, cross-cultural research into attachment, autism, and the named studies for the chosen application option.

An Edexcel A-Level Psychology answer to the child psychology application option, covering Bowlby's attachment theory, Ainsworth's Strange Situation and attachment types, the role of the father, deprivation and privation, institutionalisation, day care, cross-cultural attachment (Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg) and autism, with GRAVE evaluation.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.815 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

Edexcel's child psychology option asks you to explain how attachments form and why they matter, describe and evaluate Ainsworth's Strange Situation, distinguish deprivation from privation, assess the effects of institutionalisation and day care, compare attachment across cultures, and outline autism, using the named classic and contemporary studies. The application is developmental: it asks what early experience does to later life and how society should respond.

The answer

Attachment theory (Bowlby)

Bowlby proposed that attachment forms during a critical (sensitive) period in the first two years, through social releasers (crying, smiling) that elicit caregiving. The first attachment becomes an internal working model, a template for all later relationships (the continuity hypothesis). His maternal deprivation hypothesis held that disrupting this bond in the critical period causes lasting emotional damage.

Types of attachment (Ainsworth's Strange Situation, the classic study)

Across eight episodes the infant is observed for proximity-seeking, exploration using the caregiver as a secure base, stranger anxiety, separation anxiety and reunion behaviour. Secure infants (about 66 per cent) explore freely, are distressed at separation and easily comforted at reunion. Insecure-avoidant infants (about 22 per cent) show little distress and avoid the caregiver at reunion. Insecure-resistant infants (about 12 per cent) are very distressed and resist comfort, seeking then rejecting the caregiver.

The role of the father

Edexcel requires you to discuss the role of the father. Fathers are less often the primary attachment figure but contribute distinctively: they engage in more physical, stimulating play, supporting risk-taking and social development. Whether a father becomes a primary or secondary attachment figure depends on sensitivity, time spent and the family structure, so the difference may be social rather than biological.

Deprivation, privation and institutionalisation

  • Deprivation is the loss of an attachment already formed. Bowlby's 44 thieves study (1944) linked early maternal separation to affectionless psychopathy (lack of guilt or empathy).
  • Privation is never forming an attachment at all, for example in severe neglect, and its effects can be more severe and lasting.
  • Institutionalisation. The Romanian orphan studies (Rutter et al.) followed children adopted from neglectful institutions and found that the later the adoption, the worse the outcomes (disinhibited attachment, lower IQ), but early adoption allowed substantial recovery, showing effects are not always permanent.

Day care

Edexcel expects an evaluation of day care, weighing both sides:

  • Social development. Some research (the NICHD study) linked long hours in day care to slightly more aggression, while other studies show day care improves peer relations and social skills, especially for secure children.
  • Cognitive development. Good-quality day care can raise school readiness and language, particularly for disadvantaged children.
  • The quality of care (staff-to-child ratio, consistency of carers, stimulation) matters more than day care in itself.

Cross-cultural research into attachment

Insecure-avoidant attachment was relatively more common in individualist Western countries (Germany) and insecure-resistant in collectivist countries (Japan), reflecting different child-rearing practices rather than worse parenting, which warns against imposing American norms cross-culturally (an imposed etic).

Autism

Autism spectrum disorder involves difficulties in social communication and interaction alongside restricted, repetitive behaviours. A leading cognitive explanation is theory of mind deficit (Baron-Cohen): difficulty attributing mental states to others, shown by performance on false-belief tasks. Interventions are typically behavioural (applied behaviour analysis) and educational rather than curative.

Evaluation (GRAVE)

  • Generalisability. The Strange Situation was devised on American infants, so its categories may not generalise across cultures (Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg).
  • Reliability. The Strange Situation is standardised with good inter-rater reliability, so classifications are consistent.
  • Application. Attachment research informs adoption policy, day-care quality standards and parenting support, a strong practical payoff.
  • Validity. The Strange Situation may measure a specific relationship rather than a fixed trait, and its lab setting lowers ecological validity.
  • Ethics. Research with children requires extra safeguards (parental consent, protection from distress); the Strange Situation deliberately causes mild distress, which must be justified and minimised.

Examples in context

Example 1. The internal working model in adulthood. Hazan and Shaver's "love quiz" found adults' romantic attachment styles mirrored their infant attachment types (secure adults reported trusting relationships; avoidant adults feared closeness). This supports Bowlby's continuity hypothesis that the first attachment becomes a template, though as correlational data it cannot prove the early bond caused the later style.

Example 2. Why quality matters more than quantity in day care. Two children may both attend day care 30 hours a week, but one in a setting with a high staff ratio, consistent key workers and rich language input, the other in an understaffed, chaotic setting. Outcome differences between them show that the harms sometimes attributed to day care often reflect poor-quality provision, which is why Edexcel stresses quality over the fact of attendance.

Try this

Q1. Describe Bowlby's concept of monotropy. [3 marks]

  • Cue. The idea that an infant forms one special, primary attachment (usually to the mother) that is more important than others and acts as the basis for later development.

Q2. Explain one effect of institutionalisation on development. [3 marks]

  • Cue. Disinhibited attachment or lowered cognitive ability (IQ); the Romanian orphan studies (Rutter) showed worse outcomes the later a child was adopted, though early adoption allowed recovery.

Q3. Evaluate cross-cultural research into attachment. [6 marks]

  • Cue. Use Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (secure most common everywhere; more variation within than between cultures) to argue against the Strange Situation's American norms being a universal standard (imposed etic), while noting the meta-analysis pooled varied procedures.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of Pearson Edexcel exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

Edexcel style8 marksDescribe and evaluate Ainsworth's Strange Situation as a way of measuring attachment. [8 marks]
Show worked answer →

Split this into AO1 (the procedure and types) and AO3 (evaluation).

AO1 description. The Strange Situation (Ainsworth et al., 1978) is a controlled observation of an infant (about 12 to 18 months) through eight three-minute episodes involving the caregiver, a stranger, two separations and two reunions. Behaviour is scored on proximity-seeking, exploration (secure base), stranger anxiety, separation anxiety and reunion behaviour. Three attachment types emerged: secure (Type B, about 66 per cent: explores using the caregiver as a base, distressed at separation, easily comforted at reunion); insecure-avoidant (Type A, about 22 per cent: low stranger and separation anxiety, avoids the caregiver at reunion); insecure-resistant (Type C, about 12 per cent: high anxiety, seeks then rejects comfort at reunion).

AO3 evaluation. Strengths: standardised and replicable, with good inter-rater reliability, and predictive validity (secure infants tend to have better later relationships). Weaknesses: low ecological validity (an artificial lab setting), it may measure the specific relationship rather than a fixed trait, and it shows cultural bias because it was devised on American norms and may misclassify infants raised under different child-rearing practices (Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg).

Markers reward a clear account of the procedure and the three types with their reunion behaviour, then at least two evaluation points and a brief judgement.

Edexcel style6 marksDistinguish between deprivation and privation, and explain one effect of each. [6 marks]
Show worked answer →

Define both precisely (they are easily confused) then give an effect with evidence.

Deprivation is the loss or disruption of an attachment that has already formed. Bowlby's maternal deprivation hypothesis argued that prolonged separation in the critical period damages emotional development; his 44 thieves study linked early maternal separation to affectionless psychopathy (an inability to feel guilt or empathy).

Privation is the failure ever to form an attachment, for example in severe neglect. Its effects can be more lasting, including difficulty forming relationships, though case studies (Czech twins, Genie) and the Romanian orphan studies (Rutter) suggest some recovery is possible if good care begins early enough.

Markers reward the key distinction (loss of an existing bond versus never forming one), an effect of each, and a piece of supporting evidence such as the 44 thieves or the Romanian orphans.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this