Skip to main content
EnglandPsychologySyllabus dot point

How are questionnaires and interviews designed and used?

Self-report techniques: questionnaires; interviews, structured and unstructured. The design of questionnaires, including the use of open and closed questions.

Covers AQA 4.7 self-report techniques: questionnaires, structured and unstructured interviews, open and closed questions, and the design of effective questionnaires.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.810 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. Questionnaires and interviews
  3. Open and closed questions

What this dot point is asking

AQA wants you to describe self-report techniques (questionnaires and interviews) and how questionnaires are designed, including open and closed questions. The exam skill is to match question and interview types to the kind of data they produce and to apply good questionnaire-design principles.

Questionnaires and interviews

Self-report techniques gather data by asking participants directly about their own thoughts, feelings, attitudes and behaviour. Questionnaires use a set of written questions and have practical advantages: they can be distributed to large numbers of people cheaply, can be completed without the researcher present, and produce data that are straightforward to analyse, especially if the questions are closed. Their weaknesses are that response rates can be low, that only literate and willing people respond, and that answers may be distorted by social desirability bias. Interviews collect self-report data through spoken questions and sit on a spectrum of structure. A structured interview asks pre-set, standardised questions in a fixed order, so it is easy to replicate and to compare across participants, and needs less interviewer skill, but it cannot probe interesting answers. An unstructured interview has no fixed schedule and develops like a conversation, so it gathers rich, detailed qualitative data and can follow up unexpected responses, but it is hard to replicate and analyse, depends on a skilled interviewer, and is more open to interviewer bias. A semi-structured interview combines a core set of fixed questions with the freedom to follow up, giving a balance of the two.

Open and closed questions

The choice between open and closed questions shapes the kind of data collected. Closed questions give the respondent a fixed set of options, such as a yes/no choice or a Likert scale from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree", and so produce quantitative data that are quick to analyse statistically and easy to compare between participants, at the cost of depth and the risk that the fixed options do not capture what the respondent really thinks. Open questions invite respondents to answer in their own words, producing rich qualitative data with more detail and insight, but these data are harder and slower to analyse and to compare. Effective questionnaire design follows clear principles: avoid leading questions that suggest a particular answer, avoid technical jargon or ambiguous wording, avoid double-barrelled questions that ask two things at once, and avoid emotive language, so that the questions measure what they intend to and the data are valid.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of AQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AQA 20194 marksExplain the difference between open and closed questions, and explain one strength of using closed questions in a questionnaire.
Show worked answer →

A 4-mark item (about 2 AO1 for the difference, 2 AO3 for the strength).

Closed questions provide a fixed set of responses for the participant to choose from (for example yes/no, or a Likert scale from 1 to 5), producing quantitative data. Open questions allow the participant to answer freely in their own words, producing qualitative data.

Strength of closed questions: because the responses are fixed and numerical, the data are quick and easy to analyse statistically (for example calculating means or producing graphs), and they allow easy comparison between participants, making large samples manageable. A full-mark answer distinguishes fixed responses (closed, quantitative) from free responses (open, qualitative) and develops the ease-of-analysis strength.

AQA 20216 marksCompare structured and unstructured interviews as self-report techniques.
Show worked answer →

A 6-mark item inviting comparison (roughly 3 AO1, 3 AO3).

A structured interview uses pre-set, standardised questions asked in a fixed order, whereas an unstructured interview has no fixed questions and develops more like a flexible conversation. This produces opposite strengths. Structured interviews are easy to replicate and compare across participants because every interviewee is asked the same questions, and they require less interviewer skill, but they cannot follow up unexpected answers, so they collect less rich data. Unstructured interviews can follow up and probe responses, gathering rich, detailed qualitative data, but they are hard to replicate and analyse, are more affected by interviewer bias, and require a skilled interviewer.

A full-mark answer makes direct contrasts (using "whereas") on replicability and richness, rather than describing each type separately.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this