How can we predict the inheritance of one or more genes and test whether observed offspring ratios fit a genetic model?
Genotype is the genetic constitution of an organism. Phenotype is the expression of this genetic constitution and its interaction with the environment. Most phenotypes are affected by more than one gene. The genotype, phenotype and ratio of offspring can be predicted for monohybrid and dihybrid crosses involving dominant, recessive, codominant and multiple alleles, sex-linkage, autosomal linkage and epistasis. The chi-squared (X2) test can be used to test the significance of the difference between observed and expected results.
A focused answer to the AQA 3.7 dot point on inheritance. Works through monohybrid and dihybrid crosses, multiple alleles, codominance, sex-linkage, autosomal linkage and epistasis, then shows how to run and interpret a chi-squared test on offspring ratios.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
AQA wants you to distinguish genotype from phenotype, predict offspring ratios for every cross type named in the specification (monohybrid, dihybrid, codominance, multiple alleles, sex-linkage, autosomal linkage and epistasis), and use the chi-squared test to decide whether observed data fit an expected genetic ratio.
Monohybrid crosses
A monohybrid cross follows one gene with two alleles. Use a capital letter for the dominant allele and the same letter in lower case for the recessive allele.
A cross of two heterozygotes gives a genotypic ratio of and a phenotypic ratio of dominant recessive. A test cross ( or ) reveals an unknown genotype: a phenotypic ratio shows the unknown parent was heterozygous.
Dihybrid crosses
A dihybrid cross follows two genes on different chromosomes. The classic Mendelian result from is a phenotypic ratio (9 both dominant : 3 dominant A recessive b : 3 recessive a dominant B : 1 both recessive). This ratio assumes the two genes assort independently.
Codominance and multiple alleles
Codominance: both alleles are expressed fully in the heterozygote. Example: cattle coat colour, where produces roan (red and white hairs together), not pink.
Multiple alleles: more than two alleles exist for a gene in the population, though any diploid individual carries only two. Example: human ABO blood groups, with alleles , (codominant to each other) and (recessive). Genotype gives blood group AB; gives group A.
Sex-linkage
Genes on the X chromosome are sex-linked. Males (XY) are hemizygous: a single recessive allele on their one X chromosome is expressed because the Y carries no corresponding allele. Females (XX) need two copies to show a recessive trait, so X-linked recessive conditions (haemophilia, red-green colour blindness) are more common in males.
A carrier mother crossed with an unaffected father gives sons that are 50 percent affected () and daughters that are all unaffected but 50 percent carriers.
Autosomal linkage
Two genes on the same autosome are linked: they tend to be inherited together because they do not assort independently. Linkage reduces the number of recombinant offspring, so a dihybrid cross of linked genes does not give the expected ratio. Parental combinations dominate; recombinants arise only when crossing over separates the linked alleles, and the closer the loci, the rarer the recombinants.
Epistasis
Epistasis is the interaction of genes at different loci where one gene masks or modifies the expression of another.
- Recessive epistasis modifies the dihybrid ratio to (the recessive genotype at the epistatic locus masks the second gene). Example: coat colour in mice where a homozygous recessive at one locus gives albino regardless of the colour gene.
- Dominant epistasis can give a ratio (a dominant allele at the epistatic locus masks the second gene).
Recognising a modified ratio (9:3:4, 12:3:1, 9:7) is the exam signal that epistasis is operating rather than simple independent assortment.
The chi-squared test
The chi-squared () test asks whether the difference between observed and expected results is significant or just chance. Use it on categorical (counted) data with a clear expected ratio.
Steps:
- State a null hypothesis: there is no significant difference between observed and expected results.
- Calculate the expected counts from the predicted ratio and the total sample size.
- Compute using the formula.
- Find degrees of freedom = (number of categories) - 1.
- Compare to the critical value at .
If is less than the critical value, accept the null hypothesis (the difference is not significant; the data fit the ratio). If is greater than or equal to the critical value, reject the null hypothesis (the difference is significant; the data do not fit).
Try this
Q1. Distinguish between genotype and phenotype, and explain why most human phenotypes cannot be predicted from a single gene. [3 marks]
- Cue. Genotype = alleles carried; phenotype = observable trait from genotype plus environment; most traits are polygenic and environmentally modified.
Q2. A plant heterozygous for two unlinked genes () is self-pollinated. State the expected phenotypic ratio and explain what a deviation to a 9:3:4 ratio would indicate. [3 marks]
- Cue. Expected 9:3:3:1; a 9:3:4 ratio indicates recessive epistasis, where one gene masks the expression of the other.
Q3. In a cross, the expected ratio was 1:1 but the observed counts were 58 and 42 (total 100). Carry out a chi-squared test and state your conclusion. Critical value at p = 0.05, 1 degree of freedom = 3.841. [4 marks]
- Cue. Expected 50:50. . 2.56 < 3.841, so accept the null hypothesis; the difference is not significant.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of AQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
2018 AQA5 marksIn a dihybrid cross, the expected phenotypic ratio was 9:3:3:1. The observed numbers were 152, 39, 53 and 16. Use a chi-squared test to determine whether the difference between observed and expected results is significant. (Total = 260; critical value at p = 0.05 and 3 degrees of freedom = 7.815.)Show worked answer →
A full-mark answer states a null hypothesis, calculates expected values, computes X2, compares to the critical value and concludes.
Null hypothesis. There is no significant difference between observed and expected ratios; any difference is due to chance.
Expected values (total 260 split 9:3:3:1, so units of 260/16 = 16.25): 9 x 16.25 = 146.25; 3 x 16.25 = 48.75; 3 x 16.25 = 48.75; 1 x 16.25 = 16.25.
Chi-squared. :
.
Conclusion. 2.55 is less than the critical value 7.815 at p = 0.05 with 3 degrees of freedom, so we accept the null hypothesis. The difference is not significant, and the data fit the 9:3:3:1 ratio.
Markers reward the null hypothesis, correct expected values, the X2 working, and a comparison to the critical value with a conclusion.
Related dot points
- A population is a group of organisms of the same species occupying a particular space at a particular time that can potentially interbreed. The individuals in a population of a species may show a wide range of variation in phenotype. This is the result of genetic and environmental factors. A gene pool is all the alleles of all the genes in a population. The frequency of an allele in a population is the proportion of organisms carrying that allele. The Hardy-Weinberg principle provides a mathematical model, which predicts that allele frequencies will not change from one generation to the next, given that no mutation, migration, selection or genetic drift occurs and that there is random mating in a large population. Since allele frequencies do change, the conditions required to maintain a Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium are rarely met. Students should be able to use the Hardy-Weinberg principle (p + q = 1 and p2 + 2pq + q2 = 1) to calculate allele, genotype and phenotype frequencies in populations and changes in these frequencies.
A focused answer to the AQA 3.7 dot point on populations and Hardy-Weinberg. Defines populations, gene pools and allele frequency, states the five conditions for equilibrium, and works through allele, genotype and phenotype frequency calculations with the p + q = 1 and p2 + 2pq + q2 = 1 equations.
- Individuals within a population of a species may show a wide range of variation in phenotype. This variation may be the result of genetic factors, environmental factors or a combination of both. Differential reproductive success and its effect on the allele frequency within a gene pool. Directional selection, for example antibiotic resistance in bacteria, and stabilising selection, for example human birth weights. The role of geographic isolation (allopatric speciation) and reproductive isolation (sympatric speciation) in the production of new species, and the importance of genetic drift in causing changes in allele frequency in small populations, including the founder effect.
A focused answer to the AQA 3.7 dot point on evolution and speciation. Covers differential reproductive success, directional and stabilising selection, genetic drift and the founder effect, and contrasts allopatric (geographic) with sympatric (reproductive) speciation.
- An ecosystem includes all the living organisms and all the abiotic conditions in a particular area. Within an ecosystem, populations of different species form a community. The population size of any species is limited by the effect of abiotic factors and biotic factors, such as interspecific and intraspecific competition and predation. Population size may vary as a result of the effect of abiotic factors and interactions between organisms; the carrying capacity is the maximum stable population size that an ecosystem can support over a long period. Students should be able to use given data to describe and interpret predator-prey relationships and to investigate populations and estimate the size of a population using randomly placed quadrats, transects and the mark-release-recapture method, including the assumptions made when using this method.
A focused answer to the AQA 3.7 dot point on populations in ecosystems. Defines ecosystem, community, population size and carrying capacity, explains abiotic and biotic limiting factors and predator-prey cycles, and details estimating populations with quadrats, transects and mark-release-recapture (with its assumptions).
- Succession from pioneer species to climax community. At each stage in succession, certain species may be recognised which change the environment so that it becomes more suitable for other species with different adaptations. The changes in the abiotic environment result in a less hostile environment and changing diversity. Conservation of habitats frequently involves management of succession. Students should be able to evaluate evidence and data concerning issues relating to the conservation of species and habitats and consider conflicting evidence; and use the concept of succession to explain the management of an ecosystem.
A focused answer to the AQA 3.7 dot point on succession and conservation. Explains primary and secondary succession from pioneer species to climax community, how each stage changes the abiotic environment and diversity, and how conservation manages succession with reference to conflicting evidence.