Skip to main content
WalesReligious StudiesSyllabus dot point

How do religious and non-religious people respond to the issues of human rights?

Issues of Human Rights (Unit 2, Theme 4): human dignity and equality, prejudice and discrimination (including racism and religious discrimination), social justice and the work of justice, poverty and the responsible use of wealth, and freedom of religion and freedom of expression, including religious and non-religious responses.

A focused answer on the ethical theme Issues of Human Rights for WJEC GCSE Religious Studies Unit 2, covering human dignity and equality, prejudice and discrimination, social justice, poverty and wealth, and freedom of religion and expression, with religious and non-religious responses.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.816 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. Human dignity and equality
  3. Prejudice and discrimination
  4. Social justice
  5. Poverty and the use of wealth
  6. Freedom of religion and expression
  7. Try this

What this dot point is asking

This dot point covers Theme 4: Issues of Human Rights, the second ethical theme in Unit 2, Part B. You need to explain religious responses (Christian and Muslim) and non-religious responses (atheist and Humanist) to human dignity and equality, prejudice and discrimination, social justice, poverty and wealth, and freedom of religion and expression. The (d) question rewards a balanced argument with sources of wisdom and a clear judgement.

Human dignity and equality

Prejudice and discrimination

Social justice

Poverty and the use of wealth

Freedom of religion and expression

Try this

Q1. Why do many religions teach that all people are equal? [Knowledge recall]

  • Cue. Christians teach all are "made in the image of God" (Genesis 1) and equal in Christ (Galatians 3); Muslims teach all are created by Allah and equal before him, which is the basis for human rights.

Q2. Explain one religious and one non-religious view on helping the poor. [Short explanation]

  • Cue. Christians help the poor as a duty of love, following Matthew 25; many Humanists help out of compassion and shared humanity, often through both giving and campaigning for social justice.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of WJEC exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

WJEC Unit 2 (c)8 marksExplain religious teachings about helping the poor.
Show worked answer →

The (c) explain question (AO1). Reward developed teachings with sources of wisdom.

Teaching one. Christians are taught to help the poor as a duty of love; Jesus taught "whatever you did for the least of these, you did for me" (Matthew 25), and many give to charities such as Christian Aid.

Teaching two. In Islam, helping the poor is built into the faith through zakah (about 2.5 percent of wealth) and voluntary sadaqah, since wealth is a trust from Allah.

Teaching three. Both faiths teach that wealth brings responsibility and that caring for the poor reflects God's justice and compassion.

Top band. Developed teachings, each supported by a source of wisdom.

WJEC Unit 2 (d)15 marks'Religious believers should always speak out against injustice.' Discuss this statement.
Show worked answer →

The (d) evaluation question (AO2), with SPaG. Reward a balanced argument with religious and non-religious views and a clear conclusion.

Agree. Many believers see fighting injustice as a duty; the prophets and Jesus challenged unfair treatment, and figures such as Martin Luther King acted on faith.

Disagree or qualify. Some argue believers should act with wisdom and peace, not recklessly, and that quiet service and prayer also matter; speaking out can sometimes cause harm.

Non-religious view. Humanists also champion human rights and justice, grounding this in human dignity and reason rather than God.

Judgement. Reach a supported conclusion, weighing the duty to challenge injustice against wisdom, peace and the best way to bring change.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this