What are the major controversies in psychology, and how do you argue them?
Controversies (Section B): cultural bias, research ethics, the use of non-human animals, psychology as a science, and sexism in psychology.
A focused answer to WJEC A-Level Psychology Unit 3 Section B on controversies: cultural bias, research ethics, the use of non-human animals, whether psychology is a science, and sexism, and how to argue each.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
Unit 3 Section B examines the major controversies in psychology. WJEC names: cultural bias, research ethics, the use of non-human animals, whether psychology is a science, and sexism (gender bias). As with the contemporary debates, a controversy question is an argument: you set out the issue, argue both sides with evidence, and reach a justified conclusion.
How a controversy question works
A controversy is an AO3 task. You evaluate psychology as a discipline, using approaches and studies as evidence. The mark scheme rewards a clear statement of the controversy, arguments for and against, and a justified conclusion.
Cultural bias
Cultural bias is the tendency to judge all cultures by the standards of one's own. Much psychology is ethnocentric, conducted on Western (often American) samples but presented as universal, and uses imposed etic measures (tools designed in one culture applied to another). For example, Kohlberg's stages and many "norms" reflect Western, individualist values. The counterargument is that some processes (such as basic memory or perception) may be genuinely universal, and that cross-cultural research is increasingly correcting the bias. Conclude that findings should be checked across cultures before being treated as universal.
Research ethics
Research ethics concerns how participants are treated: informed consent, deception, protection from harm, confidentiality and the right to withdraw. Classic studies such as Milgram (1963) and Watson and Rayner's Little Albert breached several of these. The counterargument is that some valuable knowledge cannot be gained without limited deception, that ethical guidelines and committees now protect participants, and that a cost-benefit judgement is made. Conclude that ethics must be safeguarded, but that regulated research can sometimes justify limited risk.
The use of non-human animals
Conclude that animal research can be justified where the benefit is high, suffering is minimised under the 3Rs, and the findings genuinely transfer, but not otherwise.
Psychology as a science
The controversy over whether psychology is a science turns on the criteria for science: objective, controlled, replicable methods and falsifiable theories. For: the biological, behaviourist and cognitive approaches use the scientific method and build testable theories. Against: much subject matter is unobservable and inferred, some approaches (the psychodynamic) are unfalsifiable, humans show demand characteristics and arguably free will, and reliability and objectivity can fall short of the natural sciences. Conclude that psychology is partly a science, scientific in some approaches and not in others.
Sexism (gender bias)
Sexism / gender bias is the misrepresentation of one gender. Alpha bias exaggerates differences between men and women; beta bias minimises or ignores real differences (often by studying only men and generalising); androcentrism takes the male as the norm. Kohlberg's all-male sample and Freud's penis-envy concept are stock examples, and male-only samples (such as Milgram's) raise beta bias and limited population validity. The counterargument is that modern psychology increasingly studies both genders and corrects historic bias. Conclude that gender bias has distorted some psychology and must be guarded against.
Examples in context
Example 1. Milgram and two controversies. Milgram (1963) is evidence in both the ethics controversy (deception, harm) and the gender-bias controversy (an all-male sample), showing how one study fuels several controversies.
Example 2. Skinner and animal research. Skinner's work on rats and pigeons gave powerful, generalisable laws of learning (the "for" case), but raises questions of animal suffering and how far rat behaviour explains human behaviour (the "against" case).
Try this
Q1. What does "ethnocentric" mean in the context of cultural bias? [1 mark]
- Cue. Judging other cultures by the standards of one's own, treating Western findings as universal.
Q2. State the 3Rs that regulate the use of animals in research. [3 marks]
- Cue. Replacement, reduction and refinement.
Q3. Outline one argument for and one against the claim that psychology is a science. [4 marks]
- Cue. For: approaches such as the biological and cognitive use controlled, replicable, objective methods. Against: some content is unobservable and unfalsifiable (the psychodynamic approach), and humans show demand characteristics.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of WJEC exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
WJEC specimen10 marksDiscuss the controversy over whether psychology can be considered a science.Show worked answer →
WJEC rewards a balanced discussion with evidence and a conclusion.
Argue it is a science: it uses the scientific method (controlled experiments, objective measurement, replication and falsifiable hypotheses), as in the biological, behaviourist and cognitive approaches, and it builds testable theories.
Argue it is not fully a science: much subject matter is unobservable and inferred, some approaches (such as the psychodynamic) are unfalsifiable, humans show demand characteristics and free will, and findings can lack the reliability and objectivity of the natural sciences.
Conclude with a judgement, for example that some approaches are scientific while others are not, so psychology is partly a science. Markers reward use of approaches, the criteria for science, and a clear conclusion.
WJEC specimen8 marksOutline the controversy surrounding the use of non-human animals in psychological research.Show worked answer →
WJEC rewards a balanced outline.
Arguments for: animals allow controlled experiments not possible on humans, share physiology and learning processes (so findings can generalise), have shorter lifespans for studying development, and research is regulated under strict guidelines (the 3Rs: replacement, reduction, refinement).
Arguments against: animals cannot consent and may suffer, raising ethical objections; differences between species limit how far findings generalise to humans; and some argue animals have rights that outweigh the benefits.
A strong answer balances scientific benefit against ethical and generalisation concerns and references regulation such as the 3Rs.
Related dot points
- Addictive behaviours (Section A): biological, individual and social explanations of addiction, and one therapy or intervention used to treat it.
A focused answer to WJEC A-Level Psychology Unit 3 on addictive behaviours: biological, individual (psychological) and social explanations of addiction, and one therapy or intervention used to reduce it.
- Criminal behaviours (Section A): biological, individual and social explanations of criminality, and one intervention used to reduce reoffending.
A focused answer to WJEC A-Level Psychology Unit 3 on criminal behaviours: biological, individual and social explanations of criminality, and one intervention used to reduce reoffending.
- Schizophrenia (Section A): biological, individual and social explanations of schizophrenia, and one therapy or intervention used to treat it.
A focused answer to WJEC A-Level Psychology Unit 3 on schizophrenia: biological, individual (cognitive and psychodynamic) and social explanations, and one therapy or intervention used to treat it.
- Contemporary debates (Section A): applying the five approaches to a current debate such as the ethics of neuroscience, the importance of mothering, conditioning children, the reliability of eyewitness testimony, and the value of positive psychology.
A focused answer to WJEC A-Level Psychology Unit 2 Section A on contemporary debates: how the five approaches inform current debates such as the ethics of neuroscience, the importance of mothering, conditioning children, eyewitness reliability and the value of positive psychology, and how to argue both sides.
- The behaviourist approach: assumptions, application to the formation of relationships, the therapy of systematic desensitisation, the classic study of Watson and Rayner (1920), and evaluation.
A focused answer to WJEC A-Level Psychology Unit 1 on the behaviourist approach: its assumptions, its application to the formation of relationships, systematic desensitisation, the classic study of Watson and Rayner (1920), and how to evaluate the approach.
Sources & how we know this
- WJEC GCE Psychology specification (from 2015) — WJEC (2015)