Skip to main content
WalesMathsSyllabus dot point

How do we test a claim about a probability using a sample and the binomial distribution?

Null and alternative hypotheses, one-tailed and two-tailed tests, the significance level, critical regions, and the binomial hypothesis test.

A focused answer to WJEC AS Unit 2 hypothesis testing, covering null and alternative hypotheses, one-tailed and two-tailed tests, significance levels and critical regions, and carrying out a binomial hypothesis test.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.813 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

WJEC wants you to set up a null hypothesis H0H_0 and an alternative hypothesis H1H_1, choose a one-tailed or two-tailed test, work at a stated significance level, find a critical region or compare a tail probability, and carry out a binomial hypothesis test with a clear conclusion in context. This is the climax of the AS statistics section and is examined every series.

The answer

Hypotheses

Significance level and critical region

The significance level α\alpha (commonly 5 per cent) is the probability of rejecting H0H_0 when it is actually true. The critical region is the set of values of XX so extreme that, if observed, you reject H0H_0.

Carrying out a binomial test

The method is the same every time: assume H0H_0, model with XB(n,p0)X \sim B(n, p_0), find the probability of a result as extreme or more extreme than observed, and compare with α\alpha.

Examples in context

Example 1. A two-tailed test. A spinner is claimed to be fair (p=0.5p = 0.5 for red). In 30 spins it shows red 21 times. Testing H1 ⁣:p0.5H_1\!: p \neq 0.5 at 5 per cent, each tail has 2.52.5 per cent. Here P(X21)=1P(X20)0.0214<0.025P(X \ge 21) = 1 - P(X \le 20) \approx 0.0214 < 0.025, so reject H0H_0: there is evidence the spinner is not fair. The two-tailed test guards against bias in either direction.

Example 2. A non-significant result. Testing the same manufacturer's claim with only 33 faulty in 2525, P(X3)=1P(X2)0.463P(X \ge 3) = 1 - P(X \le 2) \approx 0.463, far above 0.050.05. We do not reject H0H_0: the data are consistent with a 10 per cent fault rate. Failing to reject is not the same as proving H0H_0 true.

Try this

Q1. State suitable hypotheses to test whether a die is biased towards sixes. [2 marks]

  • Cue. H0 ⁣:p=16H_0\!: p = \tfrac{1}{6}, H1 ⁣:p>16H_1\!: p > \tfrac{1}{6} (one-tailed).

Q2. For a two-tailed test at the 10 per cent level, how much probability is in each tail? [1 mark]

  • Cue. 55 per cent in each tail.

Q3. XB(20,0.3)X \sim B(20, 0.3) under H0H_0. Observed X=10X = 10, testing H1 ⁣:p>0.3H_1\!: p > 0.3. The tail probability is P(X10)0.048P(X \ge 10) \approx 0.048. State the conclusion at 5 per cent. [2 marks]

  • Cue. 0.048<0.050.048 < 0.05, so reject H0H_0: evidence that pp exceeds 0.30.3.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of WJEC exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

WJEC AS style6 marksA coin is suspected of being biased towards heads. In 20 tosses it lands heads 15 times. Test at the 5 per cent significance level whether the coin is biased towards heads.
Show worked answer →

Set up a one-tailed binomial test, then compare the tail probability with the significance level.

Let pp be the probability of heads. H0 ⁣:p=0.5H_0\!: p = 0.5 and H1 ⁣:p>0.5H_1\!: p > 0.5 (one-tailed, towards heads).

Under H0H_0, XB(20,0.5)X \sim B(20, 0.5). We observed X=15X = 15, so find P(X15)P(X \ge 15).

P(X15)=1P(X14)=10.9793=0.0207P(X \ge 15) = 1 - P(X \le 14) = 1 - 0.9793 = 0.0207.

Since 0.0207<0.050.0207 < 0.05, the result is significant, so we reject H0H_0.

There is evidence at the 5 per cent level that the coin is biased towards heads. Markers reward stating both hypotheses, the distribution under H0H_0, the correct tail probability, the comparison with 0.050.05, and a conclusion in context.

WJEC AS style3 marksExplain what is meant by the significance level of a hypothesis test, and what rejecting the null hypothesis means.
Show worked answer →

The significance level is the threshold probability that defines how unlikely the data must be under the null hypothesis before we reject it.

The significance level (for example 5 per cent) is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is in fact true.

Rejecting H0H_0 means the observed result is so unlikely under H0H_0 (its tail probability is below the significance level) that we have evidence against H0H_0 in favour of H1H_1.

Markers reward defining the significance level as the probability of wrongly rejecting a true null hypothesis, and explaining rejection as the data falling in the critical region. Saying it "proves" H1H_1 is wrong, since a test gives evidence, not proof.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this