Skip to main content
WalesEnglish LanguageSyllabus dot point

What is the Unit 5 Language and Identity non-exam assessment, and how do you plan and write an independent language investigation?

Language and Identity (non-exam assessment): an independent language investigation of 2500 to 3500 words in one of four areas (self-representation, gender, culture, language diversity), with data collection, analysis and contextual reflection.

An overview of the WJEC Unit 5 Language and Identity non-exam assessment: the 2500 to 3500 word independent investigation, the four areas (self-representation, gender, culture, diversity), and how to collect data, analyse it and reflect on context.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.813 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

Unit 5, Language and Identity, is the non-exam assessment (NEA): an independent language investigation of 2500 to 3500 words that you research and write yourself, internally marked and externally moderated. This single page is the overview of the whole unit (the NEA is one extended task, not a set of separate questions). It explains the four areas you can choose from, the shape of an investigation, and the method and skills the marking rewards.

The answer

The four areas

Framing a research question

A strong NEA begins with a focused, answerable question rather than a broad theme. "How does language construct identity" is too large; "How do two beauty vloggers use language to construct an aspirational identity for their audience" is investigable. The focus should be small enough to analyse closely in the word count and clearly tied to identity, the unifying theme of the unit.

Data and methodology

Analysis using the language levels

The analytical core uses the same toolkit as the rest of the course: the language levels (lexis and semantics, grammar, discourse, pragmatics, and prosodics for spoken data) applied systematically to your data, supported by relevant concepts and theory (for example identity and self-presentation, gender models such as difference and dominance, or attitudes to varieties). Analysis must be evidence-led: every claim about identity is grounded in features you can point to in the data.

Reflection and conclusion

How the NEA is assessed and synthesises the course

The NEA is worth a significant share of the A-level and is marked against the assessment objectives for analysis, the application of concepts and methods, and the quality of written expression and referencing. It deliberately synthesises the whole specification: the close analysis of Units 1 and 4, the language debates of Unit 2, and the diachronic awareness of Unit 3 all feed an independent piece of research. Because it is coursework, plan early, choose a focused question, manage your data carefully, and reference accurately throughout.

Examples in context

Model focus and approach (self-representation on social media). A well-judged investigation in the self-representation area might ask how two micro-influencers in different niches use language to construct distinct identities for their followers. The student gathers a comparable sample of captions and posts from each, anonymising as appropriate, and analyses them with the language levels: the lexis and semantic fields each draws on (wellness and authenticity versus luxury and aspiration), the grammar of address (inclusive first-person plural, direct second-person engagement), the pragmatics of self-presentation (implicature, the management of face and intimacy with an audience), and the discourse conventions of the platform. Relevant concepts (identity as performed, synthetic personalisation, in-group markers) frame the analysis, and the conclusion judges how each influencer's choices build a particular identity, while honestly noting the limits of a small sample and the way curated posts may not reflect spontaneous language. This shows the NEA's hallmarks: a sharp focus, a sound method, evidence-led analysis, and a measured, reflective conclusion about identity.

Try this

Q1. What are the four areas you can choose for the Unit 5 investigation? [2 marks]

  • Cue. Language and self-representation, language and gender, language and culture, and language diversity.

Q2. What is the observer's paradox, and why does it matter for data collection? [2 marks]

  • Cue. Being observed or recorded can change how people behave, so naturally occurring speech may be affected; you must acknowledge this limitation.

Q3. Outline how you would plan an independent language investigation into language and identity. [20 marks]

  • What the marker wants. A focused research question in one set area, a justified method and suitable data, systematic analysis using the language levels and concepts, and a reflective, evidence-led conclusion about identity.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of WJEC exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

WJEC Unit 5 (NEA)20 marksConduct an independent language investigation into language and identity, selecting one of the four set areas and analysing your own data.
Show worked answer →

The single NEA task: an extended, independent investigation of 2500 to 3500 words, marked against the assessment objectives.

Strong investigations have a sharp, answerable focus, a sound method, systematic analysis using the language levels, and a reflective conclusion that links findings to identity.

Choose one of the four areas (self-representation, gender, culture or diversity), frame a clear research question, gather appropriate data, and analyse it with linguistic terminology and relevant concepts (for example identity theory, gender models, or attitudes to varieties). Reference accurately and reflect on what the data reveals about how language constructs identity.

The top band shows independence: a well-chosen focus, a rigorous method, analysis driven by evidence, and a judgement about identity that the data genuinely supports.

WJEC Unit 5 (NEA)20 marksEvaluate the methodology and findings of your language and identity investigation.
Show worked answer →

A reflective strand within the NEA, testing critical awareness of method as well as results.

Markers reward honest evaluation: the strengths and limits of the data, the soundness of the analysis, and the reliability of the conclusions.

Discuss why the data was suitable, what its limitations were (size, representativeness, the observer's paradox where being recorded changes behaviour), how the analysis was conducted, and how confident the findings are. Acknowledge alternative explanations.

The best work treats the investigation like real research: it justifies the method, weighs the evidence, and reaches measured conclusions rather than overclaiming.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this