How do you write a quadratic expression in the completed-square form, and what does that form tell you about the graph?
Writing a quadratic expression of the form x squared plus bx plus c in the completed-square form (x plus p) squared plus q, and using it to identify the turning point of the parabola.
A focused answer to the SQA National 5 Mathematics completing-the-square content, covering how to write a quadratic in the form (x + p) squared plus q, the link to the turning point and minimum value of the parabola, and how the method is used in Paper 1 non-calculator work.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
The SQA wants you to rewrite a quadratic expression in the completed-square form , and to use that form to state the turning point and minimum (or maximum) value of the parabola. At National 5 the coefficient of is , which keeps the method clean.
What completing the square does
A quadratic such as can always be rewritten as a single squared bracket plus a constant: . This completed-square form is useful because the squared bracket is never negative, so the smallest the whole expression can be is , reached when the bracket is zero. That tells you the turning point of the graph without any calculus.
The method
The key idea is that . Comparing this with , the coefficient of tells you , so . The square then carries an unwanted , which you subtract back off.
Reading the turning point
In completed-square form , the bracket is zero when , and at that point . Because a squared term is never negative, this is the lowest point of an upward parabola.
The line of symmetry of the parabola passes vertically through the turning point, so for it is the line . This is useful for sketching: once you have the turning point and you know whether the curve opens up or down, you can plot the y-intercept (the value of when ) and reflect it in the line of symmetry to get a second point quickly.
Why the method works
The whole trick rests on the identity . The middle term of the expanded bracket is , so to match the in you need , that is . Squaring that half then produces a constant that was never in the original expression, so you subtract it straight back off. Seeing why you halve and subtract makes the steps memorable rather than mechanical, and it stops the most common error of forgetting the correction.
Examples in context
Completing the square answers "what is the best possible value" questions. If the cost of producing thousand items, in thousands of pounds, is modelled by , completing the square gives . The cost is least when the bracket is zero, at thousand items, where the minimum cost is thousand. The completed-square form reads the optimum straight off without trial and error.
Try this
Q1. Express in the form . [2 marks]
- Cue. .
Q2. Express in completed-square form. [2 marks]
- Cue. .
Q3. State the turning point of . [2 marks]
- Cue. , so the turning point is .
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of SQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
SQA National 5 20183 marksExpress in the form .Show worked answer →
Halve the coefficient of : half of is , so (1 mark). Write , which expands to , so it is too big and we subtract (1 mark). Then add the constant: (1 mark). Markers reward , the correction of , and the final .
SQA National 5 20214 marksExpress in the form and hence write down the minimum value of the expression.Show worked answer →
Half of is , so (1 mark). , which is too big, so subtract (1 mark). Then (1 mark). The smallest value of is (when ), so the minimum value of the expression is (1 mark). Markers reward the completed-square form and the correct minimum value .
Related dot points
- Expanding brackets (including the product of two brackets) and factorising algebraic expressions using a common factor, the difference of two squares, and trinomials with unitary and non-unitary leading coefficients.
A focused answer to the SQA National 5 Mathematics algebra content, covering expanding single and double brackets, and the three factorising methods examined: common factor, difference of two squares, and factorising trinomials with both unitary and non-unitary leading coefficients.
- Simplifying and working with surds (simplifying, adding and subtracting, expanding brackets, rationalising the denominator) and applying the laws of indices including negative and fractional indices.
A focused answer to the SQA National 5 Mathematics surds and indices content, covering simplifying surds, adding and subtracting like surds, expanding brackets, rationalising the denominator, and the laws of indices including negative and fractional powers for exact non-calculator work.
- Working with algebraic fractions: simplifying by factorising and cancelling, and adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing algebraic fractions.
A focused answer to the SQA National 5 Mathematics algebraic fractions content, covering simplifying by factorising and cancelling, multiplying and dividing fractions, and adding and subtracting with a common denominator.
- Writing numbers in scientific notation (standard form), converting between ordinary and scientific notation, and multiplying and dividing numbers written in scientific notation.
A focused answer to the SQA National 5 Mathematics scientific notation content, covering writing large and small numbers in standard form, converting back to ordinary numbers, and multiplying and dividing in scientific notation using the laws of indices.
- Calculating the gradient of a straight line from two points using the gradient formula, and interpreting positive, negative, zero and undefined gradients.
A focused answer to the SQA National 5 Mathematics gradient content, covering the gradient formula for the slope between two points, interpreting positive, negative, zero and undefined gradients, and the link to steepness and direction.
Sources & how we know this
- SQA National 5 Mathematics Course Specification — SQA (2018)