Skip to main content
ScotlandEnglishSyllabus dot point

How do you write the broadly discursive piece for the National 5 portfolio, argumentative, persuasive or a report?

Writing the broadly discursive portfolio piece: choosing argumentative, persuasive or report writing, structuring a clear line of argument, using evidence, and meeting the criteria for content, structure, style and accuracy.

How to write the broadly discursive piece for the SQA National 5 writing portfolio: choosing argumentative, persuasive or report writing, structuring a clear line of argument, supporting it with evidence, and meeting the marking criteria for content, structure, style and technical accuracy.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.810 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this
  5. A note on sources

What this dot point is asking

The second portfolio piece must be broadly discursive: writing that explores or argues a position rather than telling a story. This dot point covers the broadly discursive piece, which can be argumentative (weighing both sides and reaching a reasoned view), persuasive (taking one side and convincing the reader), or a report (informing or investigating a topic). It must be a different genre from your creative piece, and like the creative piece it is developed through drafting and marked on content, structure, style and accuracy.

The discursive piece tests your ability to organise ideas, build a line of argument and support it with evidence. It is where you show clear thinking and control, so structure and evidence carry as much weight as expressive language.

The answer

The broadly discursive piece rewards a clear line of argument, supported by evidence, organised into a deliberate structure, and written in a controlled style with technical accuracy. The method is: choose a mode (argumentative, persuasive or report) and a topic you can research; plan a clear structure (an introduction, ordered body paragraphs, a conclusion); support each point with evidence; and redraft for clarity and accuracy. The line of argument is the backbone the criteria reward.

Choose argumentative, persuasive or report

The discursive piece has three common modes. Argumentative writing weighs both sides of an issue and reaches a reasoned conclusion. Persuasive writing takes one side and aims to convince, using persuasive techniques. A report informs or investigates a topic, often using sources, in an objective register. Choose the mode that suits your topic and your purpose, and keep to its conventions.

Build a clear line of argument with evidence

Whatever the mode, the piece needs a clear line of argument: an organised sequence of points that builds towards a conclusion. Each point should be developed and supported with evidence (facts, examples, statistics or reasoning), not just asserted. An introduction frames the issue, body paragraphs develop the argument one point at a time, and a conclusion reaches or restates the position. Order and evidence are what distinguish a strong discursive piece.

Match register and technique to the mode

Each mode has its own register and toolkit. Persuasive writing uses confident, sometimes emotive language and rhetorical techniques (rhetorical questions, lists of three, direct address). Argumentative writing is more measured and objective, weighing evidence on both sides. A report is formal and informative. Match your style to the mode, and keep the writing accurate throughout, since it is drafted and redrafted.

Examples in context

Suppose you write a persuasive essay against banning mobile phones in schools.

A weak piece asserts opinions with no evidence or order: phones are useful, banning them is unfair, students should be trusted. A strong piece opens with a hook, then develops ordered arguments each supported with evidence (phones aid learning with examples, support safety with reasoning, teach responsibility), briefly acknowledges and rebuts the case for a ban, and closes with a forceful conclusion, all in confident, controlled, accurate prose. The structure, evidence and persuasive technique reach the higher marks.

Try this

Q1. What is the difference between persuasive and argumentative writing? [2 marks]

  • What the marker wants. Persuasive writing takes one side and aims to convince; argumentative writing weighs both sides and reaches a reasoned conclusion.

Q2. Why must each point be supported by evidence? [2 marks]

  • What the marker wants. Because the criteria reward a developed, evidenced line of argument; unsupported assertion sits in a low band.

Q3. Why must the discursive piece be a different genre from the creative piece? [1 mark]

  • What the marker wants. Because the portfolio deliberately shows writing in two different genres, one broadly creative and one broadly discursive.

A note on sources

This guide is AI-written and not individually human-reviewed. Portfolio modes and criteria follow the published SQA National 5 English portfolio requirements; verify current portfolio rules and criteria against the SQA National 5 English course specification at sqa.org.uk.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of SQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

SQA N5 portfolio15 marksWrite a persuasive essay arguing for or against banning mobile phones in schools. (15 marks)
Show worked answer →

A broadly discursive piece in persuasive mode. Persuasive writing takes one side and tries to convince the reader, using a clear stance, ordered arguments, evidence and persuasive techniques (rhetorical questions, emotive language, lists of three, direct address).

Structure it with an engaging opening, paragraphs each developing one argument with evidence, a brief acknowledgement and rebuttal of the other side, and a strong conclusion. Style should be confident and controlled, and the writing technically accurate.

A piece that asserts opinions with no evidence or structure sits lower; the marker rewards a developed, ordered line of argument.

SQA N5 portfolio15 marksWrite a discursive essay examining the arguments for and against social media for teenagers. (15 marks)
Show worked answer →

A broadly discursive piece in argumentative (balanced) mode. Argumentative writing weighs both sides of an issue and reaches a reasoned conclusion, rather than pushing one side throughout.

Structure it with an introduction that frames the issue, balanced paragraphs presenting and evaluating arguments on each side with evidence, and a conclusion that reaches a justified position. Objectivity, evidence and clear organisation are rewarded.

Drifting into one-sided persuasion, or listing points with no evaluation, weakens a discursive essay; the skill is weighing and judging.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this