Skip to main content
ScotlandPhysical EducationSyllabus dot point

How does a performer choose and apply the right approaches to develop a factor?

Approaches to developing performance, including how a performer selects approaches that match the factor and the stage of learning, principles such as progression and specificity, and examples of approaches for the physical, mental, emotional and social factors.

An SQA Higher Physical Education answer on the approaches to developing performance, covering how to select approaches that match the factor and stage of learning, principles such as progression and specificity, and examples for each of the four factors.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.812 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

The SQA wants you to describe approaches to developing performance, justify why an approach suits a factor and a stage of learning, and explain how training principles such as progression and specificity shape the choice. This is the second stage of the development process: turning the information gathered into action.

The answer

Choosing approaches that match the factor

Matching the approach to the stage of learning

The principle of specificity

The principle of progression

Other principles to apply

Examples in context

A netball player developing two factors shows approach selection. For a physical weakness in shooting consistency (a closed skill at the associative stage), they use progressive practice: many repetitions from a set spot, then varying the distance and angle, then adding a defender and a time limit, so progression and specificity build a reliable game skill. For an emotional weakness, anxiety before big games, they build a relaxation and self-talk routine, practised in training so it is automatic by match day. Each approach matches its factor and stage, and each is designed with progression in mind. A player who tried to fix shooting nerves with more sprints, or who practised shooting only from one easy spot, would not improve. Justifying the match and the principles is what the SQA rewards in this stage of the process.

Try this

Q1. State what is meant by the principle of specificity. [1 mark]

  • Cue. An approach must match the demands of the activity and the factor being developed.

Q2. Describe one approach to develop a factor and explain why it is suitable. [4 marks]

  • Cue. Match the approach to the factor and stage of learning, and apply progression so the challenge rises as the performer improves.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of SQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

SQA Higher 20204 marksDescribe one approach you used to develop a factor and explain why it was suitable.
Show worked answer →

A 44-mark describe-and-explain question, half on the approach and half on the justification.

Describe the approach, for example a progressive passing drill that starts static and unopposed, then adds movement, then adds a defender, to develop a physical-factor skill.

Explain why it was suitable: it matches the skill and its stage of learning, applies progression so the challenge rises as the skill improves, and is specific to the demands of the game. Marks come from the justification, not just the description.

SQA Higher 20236 marksExplain how the principles of progression and specificity influence the approaches a performer chooses to develop a factor.
Show worked answer →

A 66-mark explain question rewarding developed use of both principles.

Specificity means the approach must match the demands of the activity and the factor being developed, so endurance training for a games player uses game-like intervals rather than only steady running.

Progression means the challenge increases gradually as the performer improves, so a skill drill adds pressure and opposition over time, and a fitness programme raises intensity, keeping the performer challenged without overload. The marks come from explaining how each principle shapes the choice and design of the approach.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this