How and why did the position of black Americans change between 1918 and 1968, and what did the civil rights movement achieve?
The experience of black Americans and the obstacles of segregation, prejudice and the Ku Klux Klan, the development of the civil rights campaign, the role of key individuals and groups, and the gains and limits of the movement by 1968.
An SQA Higher History answer on the USA 1918 to 1968, covering the experience of black Americans, the obstacles of segregation, prejudice and the Ku Klux Klan, the growth of the civil rights movement, the role of key individuals and groups, and the gains and limits of the movement by 1968.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this key area is asking
The SQA wants you to explain the experience of black Americans between 1918 and 1968, the obstacles they faced, how the civil rights movement developed, the role of key individuals and groups, and how far the movement succeeded. This is a European and World option assessed by extended-response (essay) questions, so you must weigh factors and judge how much really changed.
The experience of black Americans and the obstacles
- Segregation. "Separate but equal" Jim Crow laws, upheld by Plessy v Ferguson (1896), kept schools, transport and public facilities segregated and unequal.
- Disenfranchisement. Literacy tests, poll taxes and grandfather clauses kept most Southern black citizens off the voting rolls (in Mississippi only around 5 per cent were registered by the early 1960s).
- Violence and prejudice. Lynching and the revived Ku Klux Klan (around four million members in the 1920s) terrorised black communities; in the North, the Great Migration met discrimination in jobs and housing, creating ghettos.
The development of the civil rights campaign
- Legal route. The NAACP pursued court cases, winning Brown v Board of Education (1954), in which the Supreme Court under Earl Warren ruled school segregation unconstitutional, overturning Plessy.
- Direct action. The Montgomery Bus Boycott (1955 to 1956), sparked by Rosa Parks and led by King, the Greensboro sit-ins (1960), the Freedom Rides (1961), the Birmingham campaign (1963, where police used dogs and fire hoses on live television) and the March on Washington (August 1963) put mass pressure on the system.
The role of individuals and groups
- Martin Luther King led the non-violent campaign through the SCLC and inspired millions, notably with his 1963 "I Have a Dream" speech.
- The NAACP, SCLC, SNCC and CORE organised legal cases, voter registration and protests.
- Malcolm X and Black Power. More radical voices, including Malcolm X (of the Nation of Islam until 1964) and the Black Power movement (Stokely Carmichael, the Black Panthers from 1966), rejected non-violence as the only method and stressed black pride and self-defence.
The gains and limits by 1968
By 1968 legal segregation and voting barriers had largely been dismantled and black voter registration in the South rose sharply. But de facto segregation, poverty, unemployment and inner-city deprivation persisted, especially in Northern cities; the urban riots (Watts 1965, Detroit 1967) and King's assassination in April 1968 showed how much remained undone. The achievement was real but limited.
Examples in context
A strong analytical paragraph weighing King's leadership might run: "Birmingham in 1963 shows both King's importance and its limits. King deliberately chose a city with a violent police chief, Bull Connor, so that the televised images of dogs and fire hoses turned against unarmed protesters would shock national opinion and pressure President Kennedy. The strategy worked and helped produce the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Yet Birmingham succeeded only because thousands of ordinary activists, including schoolchildren, filled the jails, and because the NAACP's earlier legal victories had already established the principle of desegregation. King supplied leadership and publicity, but the movement was always larger than one man." This makes a point, supports it with precise detail, and reaches a balanced judgement.
Try this
Q1. Which 1954 Supreme Court case ruled school segregation unconstitutional? [1 mark]
- Cue. Brown v Board of Education.
Q2. Name the two major civil rights laws won in 1964 and 1965. [2 marks]
- Cue. The Civil Rights Act (1964) and the Voting Rights Act (1965).
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of SQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
SQA Higher 201920 marksHow important was the leadership of Martin Luther King in the development of the civil rights movement up to 1968?Show worked answer →
SQA marks the essay out of 20 across structure, an introduction with a line of argument, knowledge, analysis and a supported conclusion. The named factor is King's leadership.
Argue its importance: King's non-violent strategy and oratory unified and publicised the movement from the Montgomery Bus Boycott (1955 to 1956) through Birmingham (1963), the March on Washington (1963) and Selma (1965), helping win the Civil Rights Act (1964) and Voting Rights Act (1965).
Then balance the other factors: the NAACP's legal route (Brown v Board, 1954), grassroots groups (SNCC, CORE), the role of ordinary activists such as Rosa Parks, the radical alternative of Malcolm X and Black Power, television coverage, and federal action. SQA rewards a judgement that King was central but one of many factors.
SQA Higher 202120 marksTo what extent had the position of black Americans improved by 1968?Show worked answer →
A "to what extent" essay needs a weighed judgement. Argue the gains: the end of legal segregation (Civil Rights Act 1964), the removal of voting barriers (Voting Rights Act 1965), Brown v Board (1954) ending school segregation in law, and growing black political representation.
Then weigh the limits: persistent de facto segregation, poverty and unemployment in Northern ghettos, the urban riots (Watts 1965, Detroit 1967), continuing violence, and King's assassination in April 1968. SQA rewards a conclusion that the improvement was real but incomplete, strong in law but weak in economic and social reality.
Related dot points
- The growth of German nationalism and the obstacles to unification, the reasons for unification by 1871, the problems of the Weimar Republic, and the rise to power and consolidation of Nazi rule by 1939.
An SQA Higher History answer on Germany 1815 to 1939, covering the growth of German nationalism and obstacles to unity, the reasons for unification by 1871, the weaknesses of the Weimar Republic, and the rise and consolidation of Nazi rule by 1939.
- The weaknesses of Tsarist rule and the 1905 revolution, the impact of the First World War, the February and October Revolutions of 1917, and the Bolshevik consolidation of power through the Civil War to 1921.
An SQA Higher History answer on the Russian Revolution 1881 to 1921, covering the weaknesses of Tsarist rule, the 1905 revolution, the impact of the First World War, the February and October Revolutions of 1917, and the Bolshevik consolidation of power through the Civil War to 1921.
- The extended-response essay: writing a structured introduction with a line of argument, balanced analytical paragraphs of factors, the use of evidence, and a conclusion with a supported judgement.
How to plan and write the SQA Higher History extended-response essay in the British and European or World papers. Covers the introduction and line of argument, balanced analytical paragraphs, the use of evidence, the conclusion and judgement, and how the marks are awarded.
- The 'evaluate the usefulness of a source' question: judging a source by its origin, purpose, content and what it omits, and structuring a full source evaluation.
How to answer the SQA Higher History 'evaluate the usefulness of a source' question. Covers origin, purpose, content and omission, how the marks are awarded, and a reliable structure for a full source evaluation in the Scottish paper.
- The 'how fully does a source explain' question and the 'compare two sources' question: interpreting content, adding contextual knowledge, and identifying agreement and disagreement.
How to answer the SQA Higher History 'how fully does a source explain' question and the 'compare two sources' question. Covers selecting relevant content, adding contextual knowledge, identifying overall and detailed agreement and disagreement, and how the marks are awarded.
Sources & how we know this
- SQA Higher History Course Specification — SQA (2018)