How does a performer gather valid and reliable information about the factors impacting their performance?
Methods of collecting information on factors impacting performance: qualitative and quantitative methods, observation schedules and video analysis, questionnaires and self-report inventories, standardised fitness tests, comparison with a model performer, and the reliability and validity of data.
An SQA Advanced Higher Physical Education answer on collecting information about factors impacting performance, covering qualitative and quantitative methods, observation schedules and video analysis, questionnaires and self-report inventories, standardised fitness tests, comparison with a model performer, and the reliability and validity of data, with worked exam-style answers.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this part of the course is asking
Before a performer can develop a factor, they must gather trustworthy information about it. Advanced Higher asks you to know the methods of collecting data on mental, emotional, social and physical factors, to choose the right method for the factor, and to judge the reliability and validity of what you collect. This is the evidence-gathering skill that underpins both the analysis of factors and the project.
Qualitative and quantitative methods
A strong analysis uses both, because each covers the other's weakness: numbers are objective and comparable but do not explain themselves, while descriptions explain quality and reasons but are more subjective. Together they give a fuller, more trustworthy picture.
Observation schedules and video analysis
Questionnaires and self-report inventories
Fitness tests and model performers
Reliability and validity
Reliability is improved by standardising the conditions and procedure (same protocol, equipment and a trained observer) and by repeating measurements. Validity is improved by choosing a method that genuinely reflects the activity's demands, such as a sport-specific observation schedule rather than a generic one.
Try this
Q1. State one method suitable for collecting data on a performer's anxiety. [1 mark]
- Cue. A questionnaire or self-report inventory, because anxiety cannot be observed directly.
Q2. Explain why standardising the conditions improves the reliability of fitness test data. [2 marks]
- Cue. Following the same protocol and equipment each time means differences in scores reflect the performer's fitness, not changes in the method, so repeats are consistent.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of SQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
SQA AH style6 marksExplain why a performer should collect both qualitative and quantitative data when analysing a factor impacting their performance.Show worked answer →
A 6-mark answer needs both data types defined and a justified reason for combining them.
Quantitative data are numerical: counts, times, percentages and test scores, such as the percentage of first serves in or a beep-test level. Qualitative data are descriptive: words and judgements about quality, such as a coach's notes on a player's decision-making or a self-report on confidence.
Combining them is valuable because each covers the other's weakness. Quantitative data are objective and measurable and show how much or how often, giving a baseline to compare against later, but they do not explain why. Qualitative data explain the quality and reasons behind the numbers but are more subjective. Together they give a fuller, more trustworthy picture of the factor and a firmer basis for a development plan. Markers reward both definitions and a clear justification for using the two types together.
SQA AH style6 marksExplain what is meant by the reliability and the validity of collected data, and describe one way to improve each.Show worked answer →
A 6-mark answer needs both terms defined and an improvement for each.
Reliability is the consistency of the data: a reliable method gives the same result when repeated under the same conditions. Validity is whether the data actually measure what they are meant to measure and are relevant to the performance.
Improving reliability: standardise the conditions and procedure (same protocol, same equipment, trained observer) and repeat measurements, so differences reflect the performer not the method. Improving validity: use a method that genuinely reflects the activity's demands, for example a sport-specific observation schedule rather than a generic one, and test the right component in the right context. Markers reward both definitions and a credible, distinct improvement for each.
Related dot points
- Mental factors impacting on performance: level of arousal and the inverted-U, anxiety (cognitive and somatic), concentration and attention, decision-making, mental toughness, and the approaches used to develop them.
An SQA Advanced Higher Physical Education answer on mental factors, covering level of arousal and the inverted-U, cognitive and somatic anxiety, concentration and attentional focus, decision-making, mental toughness, and the approaches used to develop each, with worked exam-style answers.
- Physical factors impacting on performance: physical and skill-related fitness, skill level and skill classification, tactics and composition, and how these sub-factors interact within a performance.
An SQA Advanced Higher Physical Education answer on physical factors, covering physical and skill-related fitness, skill level and classification, tactics and composition, and how these sub-factors interact to determine performance, with worked exam-style answers.
- Analysing and developing performance: the cyclical analysis process, setting goals from data, principles of effective practice, methods and models of practice, principles of training, and monitoring and evaluating development.
An SQA Advanced Higher Physical Education answer on analysing and developing performance, covering the cyclical analysis process, setting goals from data, the principles of effective practice, methods and models of practice, principles of training, and monitoring and evaluating development, with worked exam-style answers.
- Stage 2 of the project, research: conducting further research into the chosen factor, analysing the collected results, and using the analysis to create a personal development plan (PDP).
An SQA Advanced Higher Physical Education answer on Stage 2 of the project, research: conducting further research into the chosen factor, analysing the collected results against a model performer, and using the analysis to create a personal development plan with goals and methods, with worked exam-style answers.
- The Advanced Higher PE project (70 marks) and Stage 1, the project proposal: selecting a factor and performance context, justifying the choice, and planning how to collect baseline information.
An SQA Advanced Higher Physical Education answer on the project (70 marks) and Stage 1, the project proposal: the four-stage structure, how the project is assessed, and how to select and justify a factor and performance context and plan baseline data collection, with worked exam-style answers.