Skip to main content
ScotlandPhysical EducationSyllabus dot point

How do mental factors influence performance, and how can a performer manage them at the highest level?

Mental factors impacting on performance: level of arousal and the inverted-U, anxiety (cognitive and somatic), concentration and attention, decision-making, mental toughness, and the approaches used to develop them.

An SQA Advanced Higher Physical Education answer on mental factors, covering level of arousal and the inverted-U, cognitive and somatic anxiety, concentration and attentional focus, decision-making, mental toughness, and the approaches used to develop each, with worked exam-style answers.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.813 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this part of the course is asking
  2. Level of arousal
  3. Anxiety
  4. Concentration and attention
  5. Decision-making
  6. Mental toughness
  7. Approaches to developing mental factors
  8. Try this

What this part of the course is asking

Advanced Higher Physical Education treats mental factors as a distinct group of influences on performance that you research, analyse and develop. You need to explain how arousal, anxiety, concentration, decision-making and mental toughness each affect a performer, why their impact varies with the activity and situation, and which approaches develop them. The depth is higher than at Higher: you justify judgements with reasoning and, in the project, with your own data.

Level of arousal

The inverted-U hypothesis is the model the SQA expects you to use. As arousal rises from low to moderate, performance improves because alertness, drive and reaction speed increase. Beyond an optimal point, further arousal harms performance: attention narrows too far, tension rises, and actions become rushed and error-prone. The optimum is task-dependent: lower for fine, complex, accuracy skills (a golf putt) and higher for gross, power actions (a sprint start).

Anxiety

Anxiety can be a trait (a stable tendency to feel anxious) or a state (the anxiety felt in one situation, such as a final). High cognitive anxiety disrupts attention and decision-making; high somatic anxiety disrupts fine motor control and timing. The two often rise together, so a complete answer treats them separately but recognises their overlap.

Concentration and attention

Lapses in concentration cause missed cues, late reactions and unforced errors, and they are made worse by fatigue, distraction and high anxiety. Holding the correct attentional focus through a long performance is itself a marker of expertise.

Decision-making

Good decision-making depends on reading the situation early, anticipating outcomes and having rehearsed options to draw on. It deteriorates when arousal is too high (options are missed) or when the performer is fatigued.

Mental toughness

Approaches to developing mental factors

Try this

Q1. State what the inverted-U hypothesis predicts about the relationship between arousal and performance. [1 mark]

  • Cue. Performance improves as arousal rises to an optimum, then declines if arousal increases further.

Q2. Explain why a golfer attempting a short putt has a lower optimal level of arousal than a weightlifter attempting a maximal lift. [2 marks]

  • Cue. The putt is a fine, complex, accuracy skill, harmed by tension and narrowed attention, so it needs lower arousal; the lift is a gross, powerful action that benefits from high arousal.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of SQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

SQA AH style8 marksExplain how the level of arousal can have a positive and a negative impact on performance, and describe one approach a performer could use to control it.
Show worked answer →

An 8-mark answer needs the positive impact, the negative impact, the inverted-U idea linking them, and a controlling approach explained.

Positive impact: an optimal level of arousal raises alertness, readiness and the speed of reactions, so the performer attends to the right cues and produces sharp, committed actions. Negative impact: too little arousal leaves the performer flat, slow to react and lacking drive, while too much arousal narrows attention too far, raises muscular tension and causes rushed or error-strewn actions. The inverted-U hypothesis links the two: performance rises as arousal increases up to an optimum, then falls as arousal becomes excessive, and that optimum is lower for fine, complex skills than for gross, simple ones.

A controlling approach is centring or controlled breathing: before a key moment the performer fixes attention on slow diaphragmatic breaths, which lowers heart rate and muscular tension and brings arousal back towards the optimum. Markers reward a clear positive, a clear negative, the inverted-U as the linking concept, and one approach described in enough detail to show how it changes arousal.

SQA AH style6 marksDistinguish between cognitive and somatic anxiety and explain how each can affect a performance.
Show worked answer →

A 6-mark answer needs both types defined, the difference made explicit, and an effect on performance for each.

Cognitive anxiety is the mental component: worrying thoughts, negative expectations, self-doubt and an inability to concentrate. Somatic anxiety is the physical component: a raised heart rate, sweating, shaking, butterflies and muscular tension. The distinction is that cognitive anxiety is what the performer thinks while somatic anxiety is what the body does, although the two often occur together.

Effects: cognitive anxiety disrupts decision-making and attention, so the performer misreads cues, hesitates or makes poor choices. Somatic anxiety raises tension and disrupts fine motor control, so timing, touch and coordination deteriorate, for example a tense grip spoiling a putt or a serve. Markers reward both definitions, an explicit contrast, and a credible performance effect for each.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this