Skip to main content
EnglandPhysical EducationSyllabus dot point

How do you analyse a performance, identify a weakness and justify a plan to improve it?

The Analysis and Evaluation of Performance (AEP): analysing a performance to identify strengths and weaknesses, prioritising one weakness, and producing a justified action plan to improve it that draws on the theory content.

A focused answer to OCR GCSE PE on the Analysis and Evaluation of Performance (AEP): how to analyse a performance to find strengths and weaknesses, prioritise one weakness, and produce a justified action plan that uses the theory (components of fitness, training methods, skill acquisition), and how the task is marked under controlled conditions.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.89 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. What the AEP is
  3. Analysing the performance
  4. Prioritising a weakness
  5. Producing a justified action plan
  6. Why the AEP matters

What this dot point is asking

OCR wants you to analyse a performance to identify strengths and weaknesses, prioritise one weakness, and produce a justified action plan to improve it that draws on the theory content, under controlled conditions.

What the AEP is

Analysing the performance

The first part is analysis: watching a performance (live or on video) and identifying strengths and weaknesses. A strength is a skill or component of fitness the performer does well; a weakness is one that lets the performance down. The analysis should use correct terminology (naming the skill or the component of fitness) and be supported by evidence from the performance, for example "the player's first touch is strong, controlling most passes cleanly", or "cardiovascular endurance is weak, with the player slowing noticeably in the final quarter".

Prioritising a weakness

Producing a justified action plan

Why the AEP matters

The AEP is where the whole course comes together: it draws on the components of fitness, fitness testing, the methods and principles of training, and skill acquisition (guidance and feedback) to improve a real performance. It mirrors what a coach does, and it rewards the ability to apply theory, justify decisions and use correct terminology, which is exactly what the written papers also reward.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of OCR exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

OCR 20198 marksFor a chosen activity, analyse a performance to identify one strength and one weakness, and justify why the weakness should be prioritised for improvement.
Show worked answer →

An AEP-style task. Mark for a clear analysis, a justified priority weakness, and use of correct terminology.

Analysis: describe a strength (a skill or component the performer does well, with evidence, for example "accurate passing, completing most passes in a game") and a weakness (a skill or component that lets the performance down, for example "poor cardiovascular endurance, fading in the last quarter").

Justify the priority: explain why the chosen weakness matters most for this activity, for example that fading late costs goals and undermines every other skill, so improving it has the biggest effect on overall performance.

A strong answer uses correct terms (naming the component of fitness or the skill), supports the analysis with evidence from the performance, and gives a clear reason for the priority.

OCR 20218 marksProduce a justified action plan to improve a prioritised weakness in a chosen activity, explaining the training methods and how you would monitor progress.
Show worked answer →

An AEP-style action-plan task. Mark for a relevant, justified plan that draws on the theory.

The plan should select appropriate training methods for the weakness (for example continuous and interval training to improve cardiovascular endurance), apply the principles of training (specificity, progressive overload), and be specific to the activity.

It should explain how to monitor progress, for example re-testing with the multi-stage fitness test against normative data, and justify each choice (why interval training suits a games player, why progressive overload is needed).

A top answer links the method to the weakness, applies FITT and the principles of training, includes fitness testing to monitor progress, and justifies the choices, showing the theory applied to a real performance.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this