Skip to main content
EnglandPhysical EducationSyllabus dot point

What are the different methods of training, and which one develops each component of fitness?

The methods of training (continuous, fartlek, interval, circuit, weight, plyometric and high-intensity interval training), how each is carried out, the components of fitness they develop, and their advantages and disadvantages for different performers.

A focused answer to OCR GCSE PE Component 01 on the methods of training: continuous, fartlek, interval, circuit, weight, plyometric and high-intensity interval training, how each is carried out, the components of fitness they develop, and the advantages and disadvantages of each for different performers.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.811 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. Continuous and fartlek training
  3. Interval and high-intensity interval training
  4. Circuit training
  5. Weight and plyometric training
  6. Choosing the right method
  7. Advantages and disadvantages

What this dot point is asking

OCR wants you to describe each method of training, state the components of fitness it develops, and evaluate its advantages and disadvantages for a named performer.

Continuous and fartlek training

Interval and high-intensity interval training

Circuit training

Circuit training uses a series of stations, each with a different exercise, that the performer moves around. By choosing the exercises, a circuit can target muscular endurance, strength, cardiovascular endurance or a sport-specific mix, and it can be adjusted for any performer. Its variety reduces tedium, and it needs limited equipment.

Weight and plyometric training

Choosing the right method

Advantages and disadvantages

Each method has trade-offs. Continuous training is simple and needs little equipment but can be boring and does little for anaerobic fitness. Interval and HIIT improve fitness quickly but are very demanding and risk overtraining. Weight training is adjustable and targets specific muscles but needs equipment and good technique. Plyometrics are highly specific to explosive power but carry a higher injury risk and need a strength base. The right choice depends on the performer's sport, fitness level and goals.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of OCR exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

OCR 20194 marksDescribe interval training and explain why it suits a 400 m runner.
Show worked answer →

A Component 01 item testing a method and its application. Award marks for the description and the linked justification.

Interval training alternates periods of high-intensity work with periods of rest or low-intensity recovery, for example running hard for 200 m, then jogging or walking to recover, repeated for several sets.

Why it suits a 400 m runner: the 400 m is run at a very high intensity that uses the anaerobic system and produces lactic acid. Interval training overloads this system in the work periods and lets the body partially recover in the rest periods, so it develops speed, anaerobic capacity and tolerance to lactic acid, matching the demands of the event.

Markers reward a clear description of the work-rest structure plus a link to the anaerobic demands of the 400 m.

OCR 20226 marksEvaluate the use of weight training and plyometric training for a rugby player wanting to improve power.
Show worked answer →

A 6-mark extended-response item, marked across knowledge, application and judgement.

Describe each method: weight training uses repeated lifts against a resistance; for power, the player uses a high percentage of their one-rep maximum with explosive lifts. Plyometric training uses explosive bounding, hopping and jumping (such as box jumps and depth jumps) that stretch then rapidly shorten the muscle to develop explosive power.

Apply to rugby: power helps a player drive in a tackle, accelerate and jump in the lineout. Weight training builds the underlying strength; plyometrics convert that strength into explosive, sport-specific power.

Advantages and disadvantages: weight training is adjustable and targets specific muscles but needs equipment and good technique to avoid injury; plyometrics need little equipment and are highly specific to explosive actions but carry a higher injury risk and require an existing strength base.

A top answer weighs both and reaches a judgement, for example that the player should build strength with weights first, then add plyometrics to develop sport-specific power, so the two methods are best used together.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this