Skip to main content
EnglandEnglish LanguageSyllabus dot point

How do you select and synthesise information from two unseen non-fiction texts into a single, evidenced answer?

Selecting and synthesising evidence from two unseen non-fiction texts (AO1), the synthesis question on Component 01 Section A, drawing points from both the 19th-century and the modern text and combining them clearly.

How to answer the AO1 synthesis question on OCR GCSE English Language Component 01: selecting evidence from both the 19th-century and modern non-fiction texts and combining it into clear, paired points, without analysing language or comparing how ideas are conveyed.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.88 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. What synthesis actually means
  3. Selecting the right evidence
  4. Keeping it to information, not analysis
  5. Try this

What this dot point is asking

The synthesis question on Component 01 tests the second half of AO1: selecting and synthesising evidence from two unseen non-fiction texts. Component 01 always uses two sources, a 19th-century text and a 20th- or 21st-century text, and this question asks you to bring information from both together into one answer, usually around six marks. The skill is not analysing how the writers achieve effects (that is AO2) and not comparing their attitudes or methods (that is AO3); it is combining what the two texts say into clear, paired points supported by evidence from each. Synthesis is the habit of weaving two sources into a single, linked summary.

What synthesis actually means

Synthesis is more than summary. A summary lists what one text says; synthesis links what two texts say so the connection between them is explicit.

The marker is looking for points that genuinely draw on both sources at once. "Text 1 says travel was slow. Text 2 says travel is fast." is two separate summaries sitting side by side. "Where the 19th-century writer endured days of jolting coach travel, the modern writer crosses the same distance by plane in hours" is synthesis, because the two facts are linked into one comparison of difference.

Selecting the right evidence

Choose points that exist in both texts so you can pair them. Skim both sources for the theme the question names (travel, working conditions, attitudes to childhood) and find matching details. Short quotations or accurate paraphrase both score; what matters is that each linked point is anchored in both sources.

Keeping it to information, not analysis

This is an AO1 question, so it rewards what the texts say, not how the writers say it. Comments on word choice, tone or technique belong to the AO2 language question and the AO4 evaluation question, and they score nothing here. Discipline yourself to report and link information cleanly, then move your analytical energy to Question 3 and Question 4 where it earns marks.

Try this

Q1. What is the difference between summarising two texts and synthesising them? [2 marks]

  • Cue. Summary describes each text separately; synthesis links evidence from both into single points that show a similarity or difference.

Q2. Why must each synthesis point use evidence from both sources? [2 marks]

  • Cue. Because the AO rewards synthesising across texts; a point grounded in only one source cannot reach full marks.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of OCR exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

OCR 20196 marksComponent 01, Section A. Use information from both Text 1 (19th century) and Text 2 (modern) to write a summary of the differences between the two writers' experiences of travel. (Assesses AO1.)
Show worked answer →

This is the AO1 synthesis question, six marks, drawing on both texts. Method: select clear points from each source and pair them, so each point from Text 1 is set against a matching point from Text 2 (for example, the 19th-century writer travels by coach over days while the modern writer flies in hours). Use short quotations or your own words from both texts as evidence. Markers reward synthesis (combining and linking the two sources) and penalise answers that summarise one text and then the other without connecting them. This is not an analysis question, so do not comment on language or technique; the marks are for selecting and synthesising information.

OCR 20226 marksComponent 01, Section A. Using both sources, synthesise three similarities in how the two writers describe their working conditions. (Assesses AO1.)
Show worked answer →

A focused synthesis task worth six marks. A strong answer makes three clear linked points, each combining evidence from both texts to show a similarity (for example, both writers describe long hours, both mention poor pay, both note the danger of the work). Each point should quote or paraphrase from both sources so the synthesis is explicit. Markers credit the quality of the linking and the spread across both texts; an answer that only uses one source caps low. Keep it to information, not analysis, and label the textual support so the combination of the two sources is obvious to the examiner.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this