Skip to main content
EnglandEconomicsSyllabus dot point

When do free markets fail to allocate resources well, and how can the government step in?

What market failure is, the main causes (externalities, merit and demerit goods, public goods), and how the government can intervene to correct it.

An OCR J205 answer on market failure: externalities, merit and demerit goods and public goods, why markets misallocate resources, and how government intervention can correct it.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.810 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. What market failure is
  3. Externalities
  4. Merit and demerit goods
  5. Public goods
  6. How the government intervenes
  7. Try this

What this dot point is asking

OCR wants you to explain what market failure is, the main causes (externalities, merit and demerit goods, public goods), and how the government can intervene to correct it. This is where the case for government in a mixed economy is made.

What market failure is

Market failure is the main economic justification for government intervention. Without it, free markets would be left to allocate everything.

Externalities

  • With negative externalities, the market over-produces, because firms and buyers ignore the cost to others (for example pollution).
  • With positive externalities, the market under-produces, because buyers ignore the benefit to others (for example education or vaccination).

Merit and demerit goods

Public goods

Because the market will not provide public goods, the government usually supplies them, funded by taxation.

How the government intervenes

The government has several tools to correct market failure:

  • Indirect taxes on goods with negative externalities or demerit goods, raising their price to cut consumption.
  • Subsidies for goods with positive externalities or merit goods, lowering their price to raise consumption.
  • Regulation and laws (bans, age limits, emission standards) to restrict harmful activity.
  • Information and education to change tastes (anti-smoking campaigns, health warnings).
  • Direct provision of public and merit goods (state schools, the NHS, street lighting).

Try this

Q1. Define a public good. [2 marks]

  • Cue. A good that is non-excludable and non-rival, so the market under-provides it (for example street lighting).

Q2. Explain one way the government could increase the consumption of a merit good. [3 marks]

  • Cue. A subsidy lowers the price (or direct provision makes it free), raising consumption towards the socially desirable level.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of OCR exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

OCR J205/02 20194 marksExplain what is meant by a negative externality, using an example.
Show worked answer →

A 4 mark Explain question.

A negative externality is a cost imposed on a third party not involved in a transaction, for which no payment is made. An example is a factory whose pollution harms nearby residents who are not buyers or sellers of its product.

Because the firm and its customers do not pay this cost, the market over-produces the good. Markers reward the third-party cost idea, a valid example, and ideally the point that the good is over-produced.

OCR J205/02 20226 marksDiscuss how the government could reduce the consumption of a demerit good such as tobacco.
Show worked answer →

A 6 mark evaluative question.

Methods: an indirect tax raises the price, cutting demand; regulation (age limits, bans on smoking in public places) restricts use; and information/education about the harms reduces demand by changing tastes.

Evaluation: taxes raise revenue and cut consumption but, because tobacco is addictive (inelastic demand), may not cut it much and hit the poor hardest; bans can be hard to enforce; education is slow. Markers reward at least two methods and a judgement, for example that a mix of tax, regulation and education works better than any one alone.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this