CCEA A2 Sports Science A2 1 Practical Performance and Event Management: a complete overview of the internally assessed event-leadership unit
A deep-dive CCEA A2 Sports Science guide to the A2 1 unit, the internally assessed Practical Performance and Event Management. Covers how to plan, lead, manage and motivate others to deliver an active leisure event, and how to evaluate it against its aims, the project cycle that is assessed.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Jump to a section
What this unit demands
A2 1, Practical Performance and Event Management, is the internally assessed unit of CCEA A2 Sports Science. There is no written paper. Instead you plan, lead, manage and motivate others to deliver an active leisure event, then evaluate it. The assessment rewards the quality of the process and your leadership, not recalled facts, so the skills here are organisational and reflective rather than purely academic.
This guide sets out the project cycle the unit assesses and how to perform well at each stage. The single dot-point page for this unit gives a worked walkthrough and practice questions; this overview frames the whole project.
Planning
Planning is the foundation. Set a clear aim (what the event is for) and objectives (measurable targets the evaluation will use). Audit the resources available: time, venue, equipment, helpers and budget. Complete a risk assessment to keep participants safe. Assign roles and responsibilities so everyone knows their job, and prepare a contingency plan for likely problems such as bad weather or low turnout. A plan that is realistic for the resources to hand is far stronger than an ambitious one that cannot be delivered.
Leading and managing
On the day, leadership means guiding and influencing others towards the aim, and management means organising people, resources and time so the event runs safely and to schedule. Lead by example, brief everyone clearly, manage timings and equipment, and adapt the plan if circumstances change. Choosing a leadership style to suit the moment, directive for a safety briefing, supportive to encourage a hesitant participant, is a mark of a capable organiser.
Motivating others
Motivation keeps participants and helpers engaged and willing to take part. Use positive feedback and encouragement, set achievable challenges, adjust the difficulty for different abilities, and build an inclusive atmosphere so nobody is left out. Recognising effort, not just success, keeps people involved to the end and is central to a well-run inclusive event.
Evaluating
Evaluation judges the event against its original aims and objectives using evidence: participation figures, feedback from participants and helpers, observation of safety and timing, and the budget. A strong evaluation is honest and specific, it measures each objective against the evidence, explains what worked and what did not, and recommends realistic improvements for next time. This reflective step closes the project cycle and carries significant marks.
How this unit is assessed
A typical profile for A2 1:
- Planning quality. Clear aims and objectives, a resource audit, a risk assessment, roles and a contingency.
- Leadership and management. Safe, organised delivery on the day, adapting as needed.
- Motivation. Keeping participants and helpers engaged and the event inclusive.
- Evaluation. Evidence-based judgement against the aims with specific recommendations.
Check your knowledge
These questions rehearse the project cycle. Attempt them, then check against the solutions.
- State the four main stages of the event project cycle. (2 marks)
- List four things a good event plan should include. (4 marks)
- Explain the difference between leadership and management. (2 marks)
- Give two ways to motivate participants during an event. (2 marks)
- Name three sources of evidence you could use to evaluate an event. (3 marks)
- Explain why a contingency plan is important. (2 marks)
- Explain what makes an evaluation strong rather than vague. (2 marks)
- Why are clear objectives set at the planning stage useful at the evaluation stage? (2 marks)