How do functionalist and subcultural theories explain crime, and why do they see deviance as rooted in society's structure?
Component 3 Section B: functionalist explanations of crime (Durkheim's anomie and the functions of crime, Merton's strain theory) and subcultural explanations (Cohen's status frustration, Cloward and Ohlin's differential opportunity).
An OCR A-Level Sociology Crime and deviance guide to functionalist and subcultural theories. Covers Durkheim's anomie and the functions of crime, Merton's strain theory, Cohen's status frustration and Cloward and Ohlin's differential opportunity, with evaluation and the exam skills Component 3 Section B rewards.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
OCR Component 3 Section B examines the functionalist and subcultural explanations of crime, the first major theory cluster. You need Durkheim (anomie, the functions of crime), Merton (strain theory) and the subcultural theorists (Cohen, Cloward and Ohlin), and the ability to evaluate them against later perspectives. They share the idea that crime is rooted in society's structure.
The answer
Durkheim: anomie and the functions of crime
Durkheim identifies positive functions of crime: boundary maintenance (punishing offenders reaffirms the shared values of the law-abiding) and adaptation and change (today's deviance can become tomorrow's accepted morality). Too much crime, however, signals anomie.
Merton: strain theory
Merton's strain theory argues that society sets culturally approved goals (in the USA, material success) but distributes the legitimate means to achieve them unequally. The resulting strain produces five adaptations: conformity, innovation (using illegitimate means, that is, crime), ritualism, retreatism (dropping out) and rebellion. Strain theory explains utilitarian working-class crime (crime for material gain) but is weaker on non-utilitarian and group crime.
Subcultural theories
Subcultural theorists explain the group nature of much crime:
- Cohen argues working-class boys who fail at school suffer status frustration, and respond by forming delinquent subcultures that invert mainstream values, gaining status through non-utilitarian acts (vandalism, fighting).
- Cloward and Ohlin argue that illegitimate opportunities vary by neighbourhood, producing three subcultures: criminal (organised, an apprenticeship in crime), conflict (gang violence) and retreatist (drug use by "double failures").
Examples in context
A top essay sets the strengths (explaining structural and group crime) against the Marxist, interactionist and feminist criticisms, applies examples, and judges.
Try this
Q1. Outline two functions of crime identified by Durkheim. [4 marks]
- What the marker wants. Two functions (AO1, two marks each): boundary maintenance (reaffirming shared values), and adaptation and change (deviance signalling new morality), each briefly developed.
Q2. Outline and explain two of Merton's responses to strain. [10 marks]
- Cue. Two developed points from Merton's typology, for example innovation (turning to crime to reach goals) and retreatism (dropping out), each applied to an example.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of OCR exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
OCR H580/03 201910 marksOutline and explain two functionalist explanations of crime and deviance. [10]Show worked answer →
An Outline and explain question (AO1 and AO2). Each explanation needs development and an applied example.
Explanation one. Durkheim's functions of crime: crime is inevitable and can be functional, reinforcing shared values through boundary maintenance, for example a high-profile trial reaffirming what society condemns.
Explanation two. Merton's strain theory: when society sets shared goals (material success) but blocks legitimate means, some innovate by turning to crime, for example theft as a route to wealth when jobs are scarce. The top band applies an example to each.
OCR H580/03 202120 marksAssess functionalist and subcultural explanations of crime and deviance. [20]Show worked answer →
A Section B essay (AO1, AO2 and AO3), shown at the 20-mark cap (worth up to 40 in the full paper), marked by levels of response.
Strengths. Durkheim shows crime is inevitable and can be functional; Merton's strain theory explains utilitarian working-class crime; Cohen's status frustration explains non-utilitarian group crime; Cloward and Ohlin explain different subcultures.
Weaknesses. These theories over-predict working-class crime and ignore the powerful (Marxist critique), neglect the role of labelling (interactionist critique), and assume a value consensus. They say little about gender.
Judgement. Functionalist and subcultural theories illuminate structural causes of crime but are dated and partial, neglecting power, labelling and gender. This balance reaches the top band.
Related dot points
- Component 3 Section B: defining crime and deviance, and the measurement of crime through official statistics, victim surveys and self-report studies, including the dark figure of crime and the social construction of crime statistics.
An OCR A-Level Sociology Crime and deviance guide to measuring crime. Covers definitions of crime and deviance, official statistics, the Crime Survey for England and Wales, self-report studies, the dark figure of crime, and the interpretivist view that statistics are socially constructed, with the exam skills Component 3 Section B rewards.
- Component 3 Section B: interactionist labelling theory (Becker, Lemert, Cicourel, the deviancy amplification spiral) and Marxist and critical criminology, including the selective enforcement of law and the crimes of the powerful.
An OCR A-Level Sociology Crime and deviance guide to interactionist and Marxist theories. Covers labelling theory (Becker's master status, Lemert's primary and secondary deviance, Cicourel's negotiation of justice, the deviancy amplification spiral) and Marxist criminology (selective enforcement, the crimes of the powerful), with the exam skills Component 3 Section B rewards.
- Component 3 Section B: right realism (rational choice, broken windows) and left realism (relative deprivation, marginalisation, subculture), control theory (Hirschi), and feminist and gender explanations of crime (Heidensohn, Carlen, Adler).
An OCR A-Level Sociology Crime and deviance guide to realism and gender. Covers right realism (rational choice, Wilson and Kelling's broken windows), left realism (Lea and Young's relative deprivation, marginalisation, subculture), Hirschi's control theory, and feminist explanations of gender and crime (Heidensohn, Carlen, Adler), with the exam skills Component 3 Section B rewards.
- Component 3 Section B: globalisation and crime (transnational organised crime, green crime, state crime), the media and crime (representation, moral panics and deviancy amplification), and surveillance and punishment (Foucault).
An OCR A-Level Sociology Crime and deviance guide to globalisation, media and crime. Covers transnational organised crime, green crime and state crime, the media's representation of crime, moral panics and deviancy amplification (Cohen), and surveillance and punishment (Foucault), with the synoptic links and exam skills Component 3 Section B rewards.
- Synoptic: the structural consensus theory of functionalism (Durkheim, Parsons, Merton) and the structural conflict theory of Marxism (Marx, Gramsci, Althusser), and the debate between consensus and conflict views of society.
An OCR A-Level Sociology guide to functionalism and Marxism, the two structural theories. Covers functionalism (Durkheim, Parsons's value consensus, Merton's manifest and latent functions) and Marxism (Marx's class conflict, Gramsci's hegemony, Althusser's ideological state apparatuses), with the consensus versus conflict debate and the exam skills the theory questions reward.
Sources & how we know this
- OCR AS and A Level Sociology (H180, H580) specification — OCR (2015)