Skip to main content
EnglandHistorySyllabus dot point

How do you answer the Unit 1 enquiry, evaluating four primary sources to test a hypothesis?

Unit 1 Section A: the enquiry question, evaluating four contemporary sources for their use in testing a given hypothesis, weighing content and provenance against the historical context (AO2).

An OCR A-Level History Unit 1 guide to the Section A enquiry. Explains how to answer the source question, evaluating four contemporary sources for their use in testing a hypothesis, weighing content and provenance against the historical context, with a Tudor worked example and the AO2 skills the enquiry rewards.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.814 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

OCR Unit 1 Section A is the enquiry: a single compulsory question that gives you four contemporary sources and a hypothesis, and asks how far the sources, used in their historical context, support that view. It tests AO2: the analysis and evaluation of primary sources. It is worth 30 marks (the largest single question in Unit 1), shown here capped at 20 in line with the site's display limit. The skill is to evaluate the set as evidence for the claim, not to summarise each source.

The answer

What the enquiry rewards

Grouping the sources

Rather than working through Source 1, then 2, then 3, then 4, group the sources by what they suggest about the hypothesis. Typically two or three support the view and one or two qualify or oppose it. This lets you build an argument (on balance the sources support or do not support the view) and compare sources directly, which is what the top level requires.

Using provenance

Testing against context

Finally, you set the sources against your own contextual knowledge of the period. If a source claims the Pilgrimage of Grace was purely religious, you test that against what you know of the rebels' economic and political demands and the role of the gentry. Context is what lets you judge how far the sources can be trusted for the enquiry, and supplies the standard against which you weigh them.

Examples in context

A model opening would state the line of argument at once ("on balance the sources lend qualified support to the view"), so that every paragraph then tests the hypothesis rather than drifting into description.

Try this

Q1. Using four sources in their historical context, assess how far they support the view that Kett's Rebellion of 1549 was caused mainly by economic grievances. [shown at the 20-mark cap; the enquiry is worth 30 in the full paper]

  • What the marker wants. An AO2 answer grouping the sources by the grievance they reveal, weighing provenance to judge value, testing them against the context (enclosure, weak government, the Western Rebellion's religious contrast), and judging how far they support the economic explanation.

Q2. In the Unit 1 enquiry, what should you use a source's provenance to judge? [2 marks]

  • Cue. Its value and limitations for the specific enquiry, not simply whether it is reliable or biased.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of OCR exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

OCR H505 Y106 201920 marksUsing these four sources in their historical context, assess how far they support the view that the Pilgrimage of Grace in 1536 was caused mainly by religious grievances. [shown at the 20-mark cap; the enquiry is worth 30 in the full paper]
Show worked answer →

The Section A enquiry (AO2), shown at the 20-mark cap (worth 30 in the full paper), marked by levels of response. The top level evaluates all four sources for the enquiry, grouping them and using provenance and context, not summarising them one by one.

Method. Group the sources by what they suggest about the cause: those supporting religious motives (defence of the monasteries, the oath) against those suggesting economic or political grievances (taxation, gentry leadership).

Provenance. Weigh nature, origin and purpose: a rebel petition is valuable for the grievances the leaders chose to advertise; a government report is valuable for how the regime wished to portray the rising.

Judgement. Set the sources against contextual knowledge (the dissolution from 1536, Robert Aske, the demands) and judge how far, on balance, they support the religious explanation. The top level reaches a substantiated answer to the hypothesis.

OCR H505 Y106 202120 marksUsing these four sources in their historical context, assess how far they support the view that Henry VII faced a serious threat from Perkin Warbeck. [shown at the 20-mark cap; the enquiry is worth 30 in the full paper]
Show worked answer →

The Section A enquiry (AO2), shown at the 20-mark cap (worth 30 in the full paper). The top level evaluates the set as evidence for the hypothesis, using provenance and context.

Method. Group the sources: those stressing the danger (foreign backing from Burgundy and Scotland, the scale of support) against those minimising it (the ease of Warbeck's defeat, his low-born origins as alleged by the regime).

Provenance. A royal proclamation is valuable for how Henry wished to dismiss Warbeck as an impostor; a foreign ambassador's report is valuable for the international dimension of the threat.

Judgement. Set against knowledge of Warbeck's career (1491 to 1499, his capture in 1497) and judge how far the sources support the view that the threat was serious. The top level answers the hypothesis on the balance of the evidence.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this