Skip to main content
EnglandGeologySyllabus dot point

What are the hazards of an earthquake, and how can the risk be reduced?

Earthquake hazards: the primary and secondary hazards (ground shaking, surface rupture, liquefaction, landslides and tsunamis); the distinction between hazard, vulnerability, exposure and risk; the factors that determine the impact of an earthquake (magnitude, depth, ground conditions, population density, building design and preparedness); monitoring and mitigation (building codes, land-use planning, early-warning systems and education); the limits of earthquake prediction.

A focused answer to the OCR H414 dot point on earthquake hazards. Covers primary and secondary hazards (shaking, surface rupture, liquefaction, landslides, tsunamis), the distinction between hazard, vulnerability, exposure and risk, the factors controlling impact, monitoring and mitigation, and the limits of earthquake prediction.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.813 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

OCR wants you to describe the primary and secondary hazards of earthquakes, to distinguish hazard, vulnerability, exposure and risk, to explain the factors that determine the impact of an earthquake, to describe monitoring and mitigation, and to recognise the limits of earthquake prediction.

The answer

Primary and secondary hazards

  • Primary hazards come directly from the shaking and fault movement:
    • Ground shaking, which damages and collapses buildings (the main cause of deaths).
    • Surface rupture, where the fault breaks the ground surface, offsetting roads, pipes and buildings.
  • Secondary hazards are triggered by the shaking:
    • Liquefaction. Strong shaking of water-saturated, loose sediment makes it behave like a liquid, so buildings sink, tilt or topple.
    • Landslides on unstable slopes.
    • Tsunamis, where a submarine quake displaces the sea floor and so a large volume of water.
    • Fires, from ruptured gas and power lines.

Hazard, vulnerability, exposure and risk

These four terms are distinct, and OCR rewards using them precisely:

This is why two earthquakes of equal magnitude can have very different impacts: the hazard may be similar, but a region with high vulnerability (weak buildings, little preparedness) and high exposure (dense population) faces far greater risk.

Factors controlling impact

The impact of an earthquake depends on:

  • Magnitude and depth (larger and shallower quakes shake the surface more).
  • Ground conditions (soft, water-saturated sediment amplifies shaking and may liquefy).
  • Population density and exposure (more people and property at risk).
  • Building design (earthquake-resistant design greatly reduces collapse).
  • Preparedness (drills, warnings, emergency planning).

Monitoring, mitigation and prediction

  • Monitoring uses seismometers, GPS and strain meters to track stress and detect foreshocks, and feeds early-warning systems that give seconds of warning after a quake starts but before the strong shaking arrives at distant cities.
  • Mitigation reduces vulnerability: building codes and retrofitting, land-use planning (avoiding building on weak ground or fault lines), and education and drills.
  • Prediction of the exact time, place and size of an earthquake is not currently possible; geologists can only assess long-term probability (hazard mapping), so mitigation, not prediction, is the main defence.

Examples in context

Example 1. Liquefaction damage on reclaimed land. Buildings on loose, water-saturated reclaimed ground have repeatedly sunk or tilted during earthquakes because of liquefaction, while nearby buildings on bedrock survived, showing how ground conditions control impact.

Example 2. Building codes reducing deaths. Countries that enforce strict earthquake-resistant building codes suffer far fewer deaths from large earthquakes than countries with weak construction, demonstrating mitigation reducing vulnerability and risk.

Try this

Q1. Distinguish a hazard from a risk. [2 marks]

  • Cue. A hazard is a natural process that could cause harm (the earthquake); risk is the likelihood of harm, combining the hazard with exposure and vulnerability.

Q2. Describe one secondary hazard of an earthquake and how it causes damage. [2 marks]

  • Cue. For example liquefaction: shaking of water-saturated loose sediment makes it behave like a liquid, so buildings sink, tilt or collapse.

Q3. Explain why earthquakes cannot be reliably prevented from causing harm by prediction alone. [2 marks]

  • Cue. The exact time, place and size cannot be predicted, only long-term probability, so reducing vulnerability through mitigation (building codes, planning, warning) is the main defence.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of OCR exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

OCR H414/02 20204 marksTwo earthquakes of similar magnitude occur, one beneath a wealthy city with strict building codes and one beneath a poor rural region with weak buildings. Explain, using the terms hazard, vulnerability and risk, why the impacts differ greatly.
Show worked answer →

Define the terms and apply them to the contrast.

Hazard
The hazard (the ground shaking from a similar-magnitude earthquake) is broadly the same in both cases, so the difference is not in the hazard itself.
Vulnerability
Vulnerability is how susceptible people and structures are to harm. The wealthy city has strict building codes, so its buildings resist shaking and its population is less vulnerable. The poor region has weak buildings and fewer resources, so it is much more vulnerable.
Risk
Risk is the likelihood of harm, combining the hazard with vulnerability and exposure. Because the vulnerability is far higher in the poor region (similar hazard, weaker buildings, less preparedness), the risk and so the impact (deaths and damage) is much greater there, even for an earthquake of the same magnitude.

Markers reward the same hazard, contrasting vulnerability (building quality and resources), and risk as hazard combined with vulnerability and exposure explaining the different impacts.

OCR H414/01 20194 marksDescribe two secondary hazards of an earthquake and explain how each causes damage.
Show worked answer →

Choose two secondary hazards and explain the mechanism of each.

Liquefaction. Strong shaking of water-saturated, loose sediment causes the grains to lose contact and the material to behave temporarily like a liquid. Buildings then sink, tilt or collapse because the ground loses its strength and can no longer support them.

Tsunami. A submarine earthquake that displaces the sea floor (for example by movement on a thrust fault) suddenly displaces a large volume of water, generating a tsunami. The waves travel across the ocean and, on reaching shallow coastal water, build into high, fast waves that flood and destroy coastal areas.

(Other valid secondary hazards: landslides triggered on slopes, and fires from ruptured gas and power lines.) Markers reward two secondary hazards with a correct mechanism for each (loss of ground strength for liquefaction; sea-floor displacement for tsunami).

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this