Skip to main content
EnglandAncient HistorySyllabus dot point

How did the First Triumvirate concentrate power outside the constitution, and how did Caesar's Gallic command lead to the crossing of the Rubicon?

The First Triumvirate and the rise of Caesar: the alliance of Pompey, Crassus and Caesar in 60 BC, Caesar's consulship and Gallic command, the breakdown of the alliance after Crassus's death, and the crossing of the Rubicon in 49 BC that began the civil war.

An OCR A-Level Ancient History depth study guide to the First Triumvirate and the rise of Caesar. Covers the alliance of Pompey, Crassus and Caesar in 60 BC, Caesar's consulship and Gallic command, the breakdown of the alliance after the deaths of Julia and Crassus, and the crossing of the Rubicon in 49 BC, with evaluation of Caesar, Cicero, Plutarch and Appian.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.816 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

The depth study reaches the First Triumvirate and the rise of Caesar, the alliance that dominated the 50s BC and led to civil war. This page covers the alliance of Pompey, Crassus and Caesar in 60 BC, Caesar's consulship and Gallic command, the breakdown of the alliance after the deaths of Julia and Crassus, and the crossing of the Rubicon in 49 BC that began the civil war. The prescribed sources include Caesar's own writings, Cicero's letters, Plutarch and Appian.

The answer

The alliance of 60 BC and Caesar's consulship

The alliance is the key development: it demonstrated that the constitution could be bypassed by a private combination of the most powerful men, a concentration of power that the Senate could not control.

The Gallic command and the breakdown

The deaths of Julia and Crassus are usually judged the structural causes of the breakdown: they removed the personal tie and the balancing third party, leaving Pompey and Caesar as rivals.

The drift to war and the Rubicon

With the alliance gone, Pompey drifted towards the Senate and the optimates, who feared Caesar's army and reputation and wanted to strip him of his command before he could return to a second consulship (and the immunity it brought). The dispute over Caesar's command could not be resolved peacefully. In January 49 BC, rather than give up his army and face prosecution, Caesar crossed the Rubicon, the river marking his province's boundary, with one legion, an act of war (allegedly with the words "the die is cast"), beginning the civil war.

The depth-study debate is why the alliance broke down and who was responsible for the war: the deaths of Julia and Crassus, Pompey's drift to the optimates, the Senate's refusal to compromise, and Caesar's determination to protect his dignitas and avoid prosecution all played a part. Caesar's own account presents him as the wronged party, which is why it must be evaluated.

Examples in context

A model answer ranks the causes (deaths, Pompey's drift, the command dispute) and reads Caesar as self-justification.

Try this

Q1. "Caesar, not Pompey or the Senate, was responsible for the outbreak of civil war in 49 BC." How far do the sources support this view? [20 marks, depth essay style]

  • What the marker wants. An argument from the sources weighing Caesar's determination to keep his army and avoid prosecution against Pompey's drift to the optimates and the Senate's refusal to compromise, reaching a judgement on responsibility, and reading Caesar's account critically.

Q2. What did Caesar do in January 49 BC that began the civil war? [2 marks]

  • Cue. He crossed the Rubicon, the river marking the boundary of his province, with his army, an act of war (allegedly saying "the die is cast") rather than give up his command and face prosecution.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of OCR exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

OCR H407/21 201920 marksAssess the reasons why the First Triumvirate broke down. [shown at the 20-mark cap; the depth essay is worth 36 in the full paper]
Show worked answer →

A Section B depth-study essay (AO1, AO2 and AO3), shown at the 20-mark cap (worth 36 in the full paper).

Factors. The death of Julia (Caesar's daughter, Pompey's wife) in 54 BC removed the personal bond; the death of Crassus at Carrhae in 53 BC removed the third partner who balanced the other two; Pompey drifted towards the Senate and the optimates, who feared Caesar's growing power and army in Gaul; and the dispute over Caesar's command and return to Rome forced a confrontation.

Judgement. Argue from Plutarch, Appian and Cicero that the deaths of Julia and Crassus were the structural causes, but the decisive factor was the clash over Caesar's command, which Pompey and the Senate would not resolve peacefully. The top level argues from the sources and judges.

OCR H407/21 202112 marksHow useful is Caesar's own writing for understanding his motives in 49 BC? [shown at the 12-mark source-utility style]
Show worked answer →

A source-utility evaluation (AO3) on a prescribed source.

Value. Caesar's Civil War is a first-hand account by the central figure, valuable for his presentation of the crisis: his claim to defend his dignity (dignitas) and the rights of the tribunes against an illegal Senate, and his version of the failed negotiations.

Limitations. It is self-justification, written to present Caesar as the wronged party forced into war and his enemies as the aggressors; it is selective and shaped to persuade, so his stated motives must be tested against Cicero's contemporary letters and other accounts.

Judgement. Highly useful for Caesar's self-presentation and case, but as propaganda it must be read critically. Top answers judge usefulness for the enquiry.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this