What models and theories explain how and why language changes, and how do you deploy them critically?
Theories and models of language change (Component 2): models of how change spreads and why it happens (the wave and S-curve models, random fluctuation, functional theory, substratum theory, lexical gaps, Aitchison's metaphors of damp spoon, crumbling castle and infectious disease), deployed critically with examples (AO2).
How to deploy the theories and models of language change for Eduqas A-Level English Language (A700) Component 2: how change spreads (the wave and S-curve models), why it happens (functional theory, random fluctuation, substratum, lexical gaps), and Aitchison's metaphors for attitudes to change, used critically with examples (AO2).
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
Theories and models of language change are the frameworks that explain how change spreads and why it happens, and that analyse the attitudes people hold towards it. In Eduqas English Language Component 2, deploying these models critically is how you earn AO2 on the change topic. This dot point covers the models of how and why change occurs, and Aitchison's influential metaphors for attitudes to change, so you can frame your analysis theoretically rather than just describing features.
The answer
This topic succeeds when you deploy the models of change critically (AO2), applying them to the features and evidence in the dated texts (AO1, AO3). The unifying idea is that change can be theorised: it is not random or mysterious but follows describable patterns and serves describable functions, and attitudes to it can themselves be analysed. Your task is to use the models as analytical tools, weighing them against evidence, rather than as facts to recite.
How change spreads
Two models describe the spread of change. The wave model pictures change rippling outward from a point of origin (a region, a social group), reaching nearby speakers first, like ripples from a stone in water. The S-curve model describes the rate of adoption over time: a change is taken up slowly at first by a few innovators, then rapidly by the majority, then slowly as the last holdouts adopt it, tracing an S shape. Use these to explain how a feature spread through the language.
Why change happens
Several theories explain the causes of change at a more abstract level than the historical drivers. Functional theory holds that language changes to meet the needs of its users (new words for new concepts, simplification for efficiency). Random fluctuation theory holds that some change is simply random variation that catches on. Substratum theory attributes change to the influence of contact languages. The idea of lexical gaps explains coinage and borrowing as filling absences in the vocabulary. Apply the model that fits the evidence.
Deploy theory critically
The decisive skill is critical application. A model is a tool for explaining the evidence, not a fact to name. Writing 'this follows the S-curve' is a label; writing 'the rapid mid-period adoption of this form in the texts fits the steep middle of the S-curve, where a change moves from innovators to the majority' is critical application. Weigh the models against the evidence, and recognise that no single model explains all change.
Examples in context
The texts are unseen and dated, so the moves below are illustrative.
A model use of the S-curve. "The texts can be read as snapshots of an S-curve. An early text shows a new form used by only a few writers (the innovators at the slow foot of the curve), a later text shows it common (the steep middle, where the majority adopt it), and a recent text shows it universal (the slow top, as the last holdouts conform). Framing the spread this way, rather than just noting the form is 'more common later', applies the model to the evidence." This applies a spread model critically.
A model critique of Aitchison. "The prescriptivist objection that texting 'ruins' English rests on the crumbling castle metaphor: the assumption of a once-perfect English now decaying. Aitchison's critique exposes the flaw, there was no perfect past state, English has always changed, and digital abbreviation is rule-governed, not decay. Deploying and critiquing the metaphor shows that the attitude is based on metaphor, not linguistic evidence." This critiques a metaphor from the descriptivist position.
Try this
Q1. What does the S-curve model describe? [2 marks]
- Cue. The rate of adoption of a change over time: slow at first (innovators), then rapid (the majority), then slow again (the last adopters), tracing an S shape.
Q2. Name Aitchison's three metaphors for attitudes to change and what each implies. [3 marks]
- Cue. Damp spoon (change is laziness), crumbling castle (English was perfect and is decaying), infectious disease (change is caught and should be resisted).
Q3. Discuss, with reference to texts and relevant theories, how and why language change happens and spreads. [16 marks]
- What the marker wants. Critical application of the models of change (AO2), the wave and S-curve for spread, functional and other theories for cause, tied to evidence in the texts (AO1, AO3), weighing the models.
A note on the topic
This guide is AI-written and not individually human-reviewed. The models and theories of change are a standard part of the topic; the exact texts and mark scheme are set by Eduqas, so confirm them against the current A700 specification and sample materials, and read Aitchison and the standard accounts of change models to deploy them critically.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of WJEC Eduqas exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
Eduqas A700 Component 2 2020, Section A16 marksDiscuss, with reference to the texts and to relevant theories, how and why language change happens and spreads. [language change; theory focus]Show worked answer →
Component 2 Section A analyses language change, and this question foregrounds theory. It rewards AO2 (critical understanding of the models and concepts of change), with AO1 and AO3 on the features.
A strong answer deploys models critically: how change spreads (the wave model, change rippling out from a centre; the S-curve, slow then rapid then slow adoption), and why it happens (functional theory, change to meet a need; random fluctuation; substratum theory, contact influence; lexical gaps, new words for new things). It applies each to evidence from the texts rather than reciting it.
The discipline is to use theory to explain the change in the texts, weighing models against evidence. Reward critical application of the models; penalise name-dropping a theory with no example, or describing change with no theoretical frame.
Eduqas A700 Component 2 2022, Section A14 marksExamine the view that attitudes to language change are often based on metaphor rather than evidence, using Aitchison's models. [language change; attitudes and theory focus]Show worked answer →
This part engages Aitchison's metaphors for attitudes to change. It rewards AO2 (critical understanding) with AO1 and AO3 on examples.
A strong answer explains Aitchison's three metaphors for prescriptivist attitudes, the damp spoon (change is laziness), the crumbling castle (English was once perfect and is decaying) and the infectious disease (change is caught and should be resisted), and critiques each: laziness does not explain systematic change, there was no perfect past form, and people are not forced to adopt change. It contrasts this with the descriptivist, evidence-based view.
For the argument, show that prescriptivist objections rest on metaphor, not linguistic evidence, and use examples. Reward critical use of Aitchison's models to analyse attitudes; weaker answers describe the metaphors without critiquing them or linking them to the descriptivist position.
Related dot points
- The processes of language change (Component 2): lexical change (borrowing, coinage, affixation, compounding, blending), semantic change (narrowing, broadening, amelioration, pejoration, semantic shift), grammatical change, and orthographic and graphological change, and how to analyse them in dated texts (AO1 and AO3).
How to analyse the processes of language change for Eduqas A-Level English Language (A700) Component 2: lexical change (borrowing, coinage, affixation, compounding), semantic change (narrowing, broadening, amelioration, pejoration), grammatical change, and orthographic and graphological change, named precisely and read in dated texts (AO1 and AO3).
- The contexts and causes of language change (Component 2): the social, political, technological and cultural drivers (contact and trade, empire and migration, science and technology, the printing press, standardisation, education and the media), and how to explain why a change happened when it did (AO2 and AO3).
How to explain the contexts and causes of language change for Eduqas A-Level English Language (A700) Component 2: the social, political, technological and cultural drivers (contact and trade, empire, science and technology, printing, standardisation, education, the media), and why a change happened when it did (AO2 and AO3).
- Attitudes to language change (Component 2): prescriptivism and descriptivism, the debate over decline and progress, purism and the role of authorities, attitudes in public discourse, and how to argue critically about responses to change with concepts and examples (AO2, with AO1 and AO3).
How to argue about attitudes to language change for Eduqas A-Level English Language (A700) Component 2: prescriptivism and descriptivism, the decline-versus-progress debate, purism and authorities, and attitudes in public discourse, argued critically with concepts and examples (AO2, with AO1 and AO3).
- The language change question (Component 2 Section A): analysing dated texts from across the post-1500 period, naming the processes of change, explaining their causes, deploying theory, and comparing across the texts to build an argument about how and why English has changed (AO1, AO2, AO3 and AO4).
How to answer the Eduqas A-Level English Language (A700) Component 2 Section A language change question: analysing dated texts from across the post-1500 period, naming the processes of change, explaining causes, deploying theory and comparing across time, the multi-objective analytical task of the paper (AO1, AO2, AO3 and AO4).
- Standard and non-standard English (a Component 1 Section B language issues topic): Standard English and its history, accent and dialect, regional and social variation, overt and covert prestige, and attitudes to non-standard varieties, argued critically with concepts and examples (AO2, supported by AO1 and AO3).
How to argue the Eduqas A-Level English Language (A700) standard and non-standard English topic for the Component 1 Section B language issues essay: Standard English and its history, accent versus dialect, regional and social variation, overt and covert prestige, and attitudes to variation, deployed critically with concepts and examples (AO2, with AO1 and AO3).
Sources & how we know this
- Eduqas A-Level English Language (A700) specification — Eduqas (2015)
- Eduqas A-Level English Language sample assessment materials — Eduqas (2017)