Skip to main content
EnglandReligious StudiesSyllabus dot point

How do religious and ethical theories respond to beginning-of-life and end-of-life medical issues such as abortion and euthanasia?

Paper 2 Medical ethics: beginning and end of life issues: the sanctity and quality of life, personhood, abortion and embryo research, fertility treatment, euthanasia and assisted dying, analysed through natural moral law, situation ethics and utilitarianism.

An Edexcel A-Level Religious Studies Paper 2 guide to medical ethics at the beginning and end of life. Covers the sanctity and quality of life, personhood and autonomy, abortion, embryo research, fertility treatment, euthanasia and assisted dying, analysed through natural moral law (and double effect), situation ethics and utilitarianism, with the AO2 evaluation the exam rewards.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.815 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

Edexcel Paper 2 closes with medical ethics: beginning and end of life issues. You apply the paper's ethical theories to real dilemmas at the start of life (abortion, embryo research, fertility treatment) and the end of life (euthanasia, assisted dying). The recurring tension is between the sanctity of life (life is intrinsically and equally valuable) and the quality of life and autonomy arguments (suffering and choice matter). The exam rewards applying a theory to a case and judging it, not narrating the medicine or the theory.

The answer

The sanctity versus quality of life

Most medical-ethics questions turn on which principle should dominate, and whether sanctity of life is an absolute or admits exceptions.

Beginning of life: abortion, embryo research, fertility

  • Personhood. When does a human life with full moral status begin: at conception, viability, or birth? Natural law and Catholic teaching protect life from conception; others tie personhood to consciousness or viability.
  • Abortion. The conflict is between the foetus's right to life and the mother's autonomy and circumstances (health, rape, foetal abnormality).
  • Embryo research and fertility treatment. IVF, surrogacy and embryo research raise the status of the embryo, the permissibility of discarding embryos, and the means used to create life.

End of life: euthanasia and assisted dying

The three ethical theories applied

Examples in context

Try this

Q1. Evaluate the view that natural moral law gives the best approach to abortion. [20 marks]

  • What the marker wants. An AO2 essay applying natural law (preservation of life, personhood from conception, double effect) to abortion, weighing its clarity and protection of the vulnerable against its rigidity over autonomy, hard cases and quality of life, with a justified conclusion.

Q2. Explain the difference between active and passive euthanasia. [8 marks]

  • Cue. Active euthanasia is an act that directly causes death (e.g. a lethal injection); passive euthanasia is withholding or withdrawing treatment so the illness causes death. Add the voluntary/non-voluntary distinction and the moral weight placed on the acts/omissions difference for the higher marks.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of Pearson Edexcel exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

Edexcel-style20 marksEvaluate the usefulness of situation ethics for resolving issues in medical ethics.
Show worked answer →

A Section C extended essay marked mainly on AO2. The levels reward applying the theory to real medical cases and judging it, not describing the theory or the issue alone.

Apply. Situation ethics judges each case by agape: it would permit abortion or euthanasia where these are the most loving outcome (sparing suffering, respecting a mother's circumstances), making it flexible and person-centred rather than rule-bound.

Evaluate. Strengths: it responds to the particular case, weighs quality of life and autonomy, and avoids the rigidity of absolute rules. Weaknesses: love is hard to measure, it can justify almost anything, it offers patients and doctors little security, and predicting the most loving outcome is uncertain.

Compare with natural moral law's sanctity-of-life position and conclude with reasons. A clear verdict reaches the top level.

Edexcel-style20 marksAnalyse the view that the sanctity of life makes euthanasia always wrong.
Show worked answer →

A Section C essay testing AO1 understanding of the sanctity-of-life principle and AO2 evaluation.

Explain. The sanctity-of-life principle holds that human life is intrinsically valuable because it is God-given and made in God's image, so it must not be deliberately taken; natural moral law's precept of preserving life and the doctrine of double effect (permitting pain relief that may shorten life, but not killing) follow from this.

Challenge. Quality-of-life and autonomy arguments hold that a life of unrelievable suffering may not be worth preserving and that competent patients have a right to choose; utilitarianism weighs the suffering prevented; situation ethics asks what love requires.

Judge whether sanctity of life is an absolute or admits exceptions, and conclude with reasons.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this