Skip to main content
WalesEnglish Language & LiteratureSyllabus dot point

How do you write a reasoned argument for the WJEC Unit 3 writing task?

Argumentation writing: constructing a reasoned, balanced argument on an issue for the Unit 3 writing task, using logical structure, evidence and counter-argument, written accurately (AO5 and AO6).

How to write a reasoned argument for the WJEC GCSE English Language Unit 3 writing task: building a logical, balanced case on an issue, using evidence and counter-argument, reaching a clear position, and writing accurately for purpose and audience (AO5 and AO6).

Generated by Claude Opus 4.89 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. Argumentation versus persuasion
  3. Take a clear position
  4. Develop reasoned points with support
  5. Handle the counter-argument
  6. How the argumentation task appears on the paper
  7. Try this

What this dot point is asking

Unit 3 Section B sets two compulsory writing tasks, one argumentation and one persuasion. Argumentation asks you to build a reasoned, balanced case on an issue, using logical structure, evidence and counter-argument, written accurately (AO5 and AO6). Half the marks are for communication and organisation, half for technical accuracy.

Argumentation versus persuasion

WJEC sets both an argument and a persuasion task, and they are not the same. Knowing the difference shapes your writing.

Take a clear position

Even a balanced argument reaches a conclusion. Decide your side at the planning stage.

A clear position gives the writing direction. You can acknowledge the opposing view, but the reader should never be in doubt where you stand. State your line early and return to it in the conclusion.

Develop reasoned points with support

Argumentation is built on reasoning, not assertion.

Handle the counter-argument

The mark of a strong argument is that it engages with the other side rather than ignoring it. Acknowledging a fair opposing point and then answering it makes your own case stronger, not weaker, because it shows you have weighed the issue rather than ignored half of it. The move is to concede genuinely ("it is true that phones can support learning") and then rebut with reasoning ("but the attention cost in practice outweighs that benefit"). A piece that never admits the other side exists reads as one-sided persuasion, which is the other task, so handling the counter-argument is what marks the writing as genuine argumentation.

How the argumentation task appears on the paper

Argumentation is one of the two compulsory Unit 3 writing tasks, set alongside persuasion. It typically gives a statement to respond to ("mobile phones should be banned in schools") and a form to write in (an article, a speech, a letter). The examiners reward a logical, developed case: a clear position, reasoned points with support, a counter-argument acknowledged and rebutted, and a firm conclusion. The marks split evenly between communication and organisation and technical accuracy, so a clear structure and accurate writing each carry half the credit. The most common weaknesses are unsupported assertion, where opinions are stated but not reasoned, and ignoring the counter-view, which turns the argument into a rant, so build the logic visibly and engage with the other side.

Try this

Q1. How does argumentation differ from persuasion? [2 marks]

  • Cue. Argumentation reasons towards a position and engages with the other side; persuasion drives the reader to one conclusion, more emotively and one-sidedly.

Q2. What three parts make a reasoned point? [3 marks]

  • Cue. A claim, support (evidence or example), and an explanation of the logic linking them.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of WJEC exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

WJEC Unit 320 marks'Mobile phones should be banned in schools.' Write an article arguing for or against this view.
Show worked answer →

Argumentation builds a reasoned case on an issue (AO5), written accurately (AO6). It is more balanced and logical than pure persuasion, and reaches a clear position.

Take a side, then develop two or three reasoned points each with support, acknowledge and rebut a counter-argument, and conclude firmly. Use a logical structure and connectives of reasoning ("therefore", "however", "as a result"). Match the article form and proofread.

Markers reward a logical, developed argument that engages with the other side; weaker answers assert opinions without reasoning or ignore the counter-view.

WJEC Unit 320 marksWrite the text for a speech arguing that your town needs better facilities for young people.
Show worked answer →

This argumentation task wants a reasoned case in speech form (AO5), accurately written (AO6). Argue logically while suiting the spoken form.

Build reasoned points (boredom and antisocial behaviour, health, opportunity) each supported, address the cost objection and rebut it, and conclude with a clear call. Use speech features (direct address, rhetorical questions) but keep the reasoning central, and proofread.

The top band reasons clearly and handles the counter-argument; common failures are unsupported assertion and forgetting the speech form.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this