How do you compare the classical world with the modern world, the key skill in Classical Studies?
Comparing the classical and modern worlds: how to draw out similarities and differences in values and practices, and how to use comparison to reach a supported judgement.
The key Classical Studies skill of comparing the classical world with the modern world: how to identify genuine similarities and differences in values and practices, support them with knowledge, and use the comparison to reach a clear, supported judgement.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
This dot point covers the skill at the heart of Classical Studies: comparing the classical world with the modern world. The subject is not only about learning facts about Greece and Rome; it asks you to set those facts against your own world and reach a view. This skill runs through every area, from Athenian citizenship to Roman entertainment to the values of the Odyssey, and the higher marks in the paper depend on doing it well. Knowing how to make a genuine, supported comparison is what this topic teaches.
The comparison skill underpins the evaluative questions and is central to the assignment. The advice here follows the standard expectations of the course; always check the current SQA specification and specimen paper for the exact wording.
The answer
Comparing the classical and modern worlds means drawing out genuine similarities and differences in values and practices, supporting each with accurate knowledge, and using them to reach a clear judgement. A strong comparison does three things. First, it identifies real points of contact, not vague ones: for example, that both classical and modern societies value family, loyalty and hospitality, or enjoy mass entertainment and sport. Second, it identifies real differences: that classical societies accepted slavery, which modern societies reject; that political and legal rights were limited to a minority of free men, where modern democracies extend rights far more widely, including to women; and that women's roles were far more restricted. Third, it reaches a supported judgement, such as that the structures of the classical world differ sharply from ours while many underlying human values are shared. Vague or one-sided comparisons score poorly; specific, balanced ones, each backed by an example, are what earn the marks.
Finding genuine similarities
A good comparison starts with real, specific similarities, not woolly ones. Across the course you can find values that still matter today: families were central in both Athens and Rome, as now; loyalty was prized, as Penelope shows; hospitality (xenia) mattered deeply, as kindness to guests does today; and people loved mass entertainment, much as modern crowds enjoy sport. Naming a specific shared value and tying it to a classical and a modern example makes the similarity convincing rather than vague.
Finding genuine differences
Equally important are clear differences. The classical world differed from ours in major ways that you can support with knowledge: slavery was a normal, accepted part of Greek and Roman society, whereas it is rejected today; political and legal rights belonged only to a minority (free citizen men), where modern democracies give wide rights, including to women; and the roles open to women were far more limited. Picking a sharp, well-evidenced difference, such as the acceptance of slavery, and explaining it briefly, is far stronger than a list of vague contrasts.
Reaching a judgement
Comparison is not just listing likenesses and differences; the evaluative questions want you to use them to reach a view. After weighing genuine similarities against genuine differences, you give a clear conclusion that answers the exact question, for example that the classical and modern worlds differ greatly in their structures (slavery, limited rights) but share many underlying human values (family, loyalty, hospitality, heroism). The conclusion should follow naturally from the comparisons you have made, showing the marker that your judgement is supported.
Examples in context
Suppose a question asks how far classical values differed from modern ones. You weigh differences (slavery accepted then but rejected now; rights limited to a minority then but wide now) against similarities (family, loyalty, hospitality and love of heroism shared), then conclude that the worlds differ in structure but share underlying values.
Suppose a Describe-style question asks for two similarities and two differences. You give specific points: similarities such as valuing family and enjoying mass entertainment; differences such as the acceptance of slavery and the exclusion of women from political rights.
Try this
Q1. Give one genuine similarity between the classical and modern worlds, with an example. [2 marks]
- What the marker wants. Any one supported similarity, for example valuing family or loyalty (as Penelope shows), or enjoying mass entertainment (chariot races and modern sport).
Q2. Give one clear difference, with support. [2 marks]
- What the marker wants. Any one supported difference, for example the acceptance of slavery in Greece and Rome versus its rejection today, or limited political rights then versus wide rights now.
Q3. Why is a vague comparison unlikely to score? [2 marks]
- What the marker wants. Because the marks reward specific, supported comparisons with examples; loose claims with no detail, or describing only the classical world, do not show real comparison.
A note on sources
This guide is AI-written and not individually human-reviewed. The advice follows the standard expectations of SQA National 5 Classical Studies; verify it against the current SQA (Qualifications Scotland) course specification, specimen paper and past papers at sqa.org.uk.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of SQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
SQA N5 style8 marksHow far were the values of the classical world different from those of the modern world? (8 marks)Show worked answer →
An evaluative comparison question, so weigh similarities against differences and reach a judgement.
Differences: classical societies accepted slavery as normal, which modern societies reject; political rights were limited to a minority (free citizen men), where modern democracies give wide rights including to women; and roles for women were far more restricted in much of the classical world.
Similarities to balance it: values such as hospitality, loyalty, family and admiration for heroism still matter today; people then and now valued reputation, justice and community; and stories such as the Odyssey still speak to modern audiences.
Judgement: conclude that many classical practices, such as slavery and limited rights, differ sharply from modern values, but many underlying human values, family, loyalty, hospitality, heroism, are shared, so the worlds are different in their structures but connected in their values. State the judgement clearly for the evaluation marks.
SQA N5 style6 marksDescribe two ways the classical world was similar to the modern world and two ways it was different. (6 marks)Show worked answer →
A Describe question asking for specific comparisons, so make clear, developed points.
Similarities: people valued family life and loyalty, much as today; and audiences enjoyed mass entertainment and sport, like modern crowds at games and theatre.
Differences: classical societies relied on slavery, which is rejected today; and political and legal rights were limited to a minority, where modern societies extend rights far more widely, including to women.
Develop each point with a brief example, for example chariot racing crowds for entertainment, or the exclusion of women from voting for rights. Four developed comparison points (two each way) reach the marks.
Related dot points
- The question paper and its question types: how Describe and the evaluative questions (how far, how important) are marked, and how to structure a good answer to each.
How the SQA National 5 Classical Studies question paper works: the Describe questions that reward developed points of fact and the evaluative questions (how far, how important) that reward a weighed, supported judgement, and how to structure each.
- The assignment (coursework overview): choosing a classical studies issue, researching it with a resource sheet, writing it up under supervised conditions, and how it is marked.
An overview of the SQA National 5 Classical Studies assignment: choosing a focused classical studies issue, researching it in advance using a resource sheet, writing it up under supervised conditions, and how it is marked for knowledge, evidence, structure and a supported conclusion.
- Enslaved people in classical Greece: how people became enslaved, the wide range of work they did, the great differences in their treatment, and the slim chances of freedom.
Enslaved people in classical Athens: how they were enslaved through war, piracy and birth, the wide range of work they did from household tasks to the silver mines, the sharp differences in how they were treated, and their limited chances of being freed.
- Roman entertainment: the gladiatorial games and beast hunts of the amphitheatre, the chariot racing of the circus, the public baths as a social centre, and the political uses of public spectacle.
Roman entertainment: the gladiatorial games and beast hunts of the amphitheatre, the chariot racing of the circus, the public baths as a daily social centre, and how rulers used free public spectacle ('bread and circuses') to win popularity.
- Values in the Odyssey: the sacred duty of hospitality (xenia) and how good and bad hosts are judged, alongside the values of loyalty, cunning and respect for the gods.
The values promoted in Homer's Odyssey: the sacred guest-host duty of hospitality (xenia) and how good and bad hosts such as the Phaeacians and the Cyclops are judged, together with loyalty, cunning and respect for the gods.
Sources & how we know this
- National 5 Classical Studies Course Specification — SQA (2025)
- National 5 Classical Studies Specimen Question Paper — SQA (2024)