Skip to main content
ScotlandModern StudiesSyllabus dot point

How should Scotland be governed within or beyond the UK?

The place of Scotland within the UK and alternatives for its governance, including the status quo, further devolution and independence, the 2014 referendum, the powers of the Scotland Act 2016, and the implications of leaving the EU.

An SQA Higher Modern Studies answer on the place of Scotland within the UK and the alternatives for its governance, covering the 2014 independence referendum, the status quo, further devolution under the Scotland Act 2016, the case for and against independence, the 2022 Supreme Court ruling and the implications of Brexit.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.811 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

The SQA wants you to explain the place of Scotland within the UK and to analyse the alternatives for how Scotland could be governed: the status quo (current devolution), further devolution, and independence. You should know the 2014 referendum result, the powers added by the Scotland Act 2016, the case for and against independence, the legal position after the 2022 Supreme Court ruling, and the implications of Brexit. This is a frequent 2020-mark essay.

The answer

The 2014 referendum and the status quo

Further devolution: the Scotland Act 2016

The case for and against independence

Brexit and the legal position

Examples in context

The Scottish Child Payment is the clearest example of devolution in action: it was created using the welfare powers in the Scotland Act 20162016 and shows Holyrood using new powers to pursue distinctively Scottish priorities on child poverty. The 20222022 Supreme Court case is the key example of the limits of devolution: it confirmed that the constitution is reserved and that the UK Parliament retains ultimate control over whether a legal independence referendum can be held. Using both lets a Higher answer show devolution both empowering and constraining the Scottish Parliament.

Try this

Q1. Describe two powers given to the Scottish Parliament by the Scotland Act 2016. [4 marks]

  • Cue. The power to set income tax rates and bands on earned income, and the power to top up or create benefits, which was used to introduce the Scottish Child Payment.

Q2. Explain why some people argue Scotland should become independent. [6 marks]

  • Cue. The democratic deficit (getting UK governments Scotland did not vote for), full control of tax, welfare and foreign policy, and the chance to rejoin the EU after Scotland voted around 6262 per cent Remain in 20162016.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of SQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

SQA Higher 201820 marksTo what extent is the current devolution settlement the best way to govern Scotland?
Show worked answer →

A 2020-mark essay: up to 88 marks for knowledge and understanding and up to 1212 for analysis, evaluation, structure and a sustained conclusion.

KU marks come from describing the three options accurately: the status quo (devolution under the Scotland Acts 19981998, 20122012 and 20162016), further devolution or "devo-max", and independence. Real detail such as the Scotland Act 20162016 giving Holyrood power over income tax rates and bands and some welfare powers (used for the Scottish Child Payment) earns credit.

Analysis and evaluation marks come from weighing the options against each other on the democratic deficit, economic risk and policy control. A sustained conclusion, for example that devolution balances self-government with security but leaves the democratic deficit unresolved, lifts the mark into the top band.

SQA Higher 202112 marksAnalyse the arguments in favour of Scottish independence.
Show worked answer →

A 1212-mark analysis question, roughly half KU and half analysis. Markers reward developed explanation of why each argument supports independence, not a bare list.

KU should cover the democratic deficit (Scotland sometimes getting UK governments it did not vote for), full control of tax, welfare, defence and foreign policy, and the Brexit argument that Scotland voted around 6262 per cent Remain yet was taken out of the EU.

Analysis marks come from explaining why these arguments are persuasive and acknowledging the counter-arguments on currency, the fiscal deficit and a possible hard border with the rest of the UK. A judgement on how strong the case is overall is the discriminator.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this