How do you reference quotations and criticism in a dissertation and meet the academic conventions SQA expects?
Referencing and academic conventions: acknowledging primary and secondary sources consistently, integrating quotations accurately, including a bibliography and word count, and meeting the conditions of authenticity SQA requires of submitted coursework.
How to reference and present the SQA Advanced Higher English dissertation: acknowledging primary and secondary sources consistently, integrating quotations accurately, including a bibliography and word count, and meeting the authenticity conditions SQA requires of submitted coursework.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
A dissertation is submitted coursework, so it must meet academic conventions as well as make a good argument. That means acknowledging every source, integrating quotations accurately, stating a word count, including a bibliography, and certifying that the work is the candidate's own. SQA does not prescribe a single referencing style, but it requires consistent, honest acknowledgement of sources. These conventions are not decoration: a dissertation that breaches them can be penalised or, in the case of plagiarism, fail.
This dot point is about referencing and presentation: how to acknowledge sources, integrate quotations, and meet the authenticity conditions of submitted coursework.
The answer
Reference every borrowed word or idea, primary and secondary, in a consistent style chosen by your centre (in-text references or footnotes), integrate quotations accurately into your sentences, state the word count, and include a bibliography listing every source used. The work must be your own, with all quotations and ideas from others acknowledged, because submitted coursework must meet SQA's authenticity conditions. SQA does not require a particular referencing system, so the rule is consistency: pick the centre's style and apply it the same way throughout. Good referencing serves two ends at once: it meets the rules, and it displays the breadth of reading and the honesty that the dissertation rewards.
Acknowledge every source
Every quotation and every borrowed idea must be acknowledged, whether from a primary text or a critic. Use the centre's chosen system (in-text author and page, or footnotes) consistently. Unacknowledged use of someone else's words or ideas is plagiarism, which is treated seriously in submitted coursework, so when in doubt, reference.
Integrate quotations accurately
Quote accurately and embed short quotations into your own sentences, so the analysis flows and the reader can see exactly what is yours and what is quoted. Long block quotations eat the word count and tempt you into letting the text do the talking; short embedded quotations keep your analysis in control. Reference each quotation in the chosen style.
Present the dissertation properly
Besides the argument, the finished dissertation needs the apparatus of submitted coursework: a word count within 2,500 to 3,500 words, consistent references throughout, and a complete bibliography. Check these before submission, because a strong argument can be undercut by a missing bibliography, an over-length count, or inconsistent referencing that the marker has to untangle.
Examples in context
A candidate quoting a novel writes the sentence so the quotation is embedded ("the narrator's claim that she 'never lies' is itself a lie"), then references it in the centre's style, perhaps a footnote giving author, title and page. When they bring in a critic, they quote or paraphrase, then reference that too, so the reader can see which words are the critic's. At the end, the bibliography lists both novels and every critical work consulted, and the word count sits within the limit.
The dissertation thus meets the conventions without distracting from the argument: references are consistent, quotations are accurate and embedded, the bibliography shows the reading, and the work is unmistakably the candidate's own. The conventions support the scholarship rather than competing with it.
Try this
Q1. What four things besides the argument must a finished dissertation include? [2 marks]
- What the marker wants. Consistent acknowledgement of sources, accurately integrated quotations, a word count within the limit, and a complete bibliography.
Q2. Since SQA prescribes no referencing style, what is the rule? [2 marks]
- What the marker wants. Consistency: adopt the centre's chosen style and apply it the same way to every reference throughout.
Q3. Why must paraphrased ideas from critics be referenced, not only direct quotations? [1 mark]
- What the marker wants. Because unacknowledged use of another's ideas, not just their exact words, is plagiarism in submitted coursework.
A note on sources
This guide is AI-written and not individually human-reviewed. The referencing and authenticity requirements follow SQA's coursework instructions; verify current detail against the coursework instructions and your centre's guidance at sqa.org.uk.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of SQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
Dissertation brief15 marksWhat must a finished dissertation include besides the argument to meet SQA's presentation and referencing requirements? (15 marks)Show worked answer →
A question about presentation. Besides the argument, a dissertation must acknowledge its sources consistently (in-text references or footnotes), integrate quotations accurately, state its word count, and include a bibliography listing every primary and secondary source used.
A strong answer notes that SQA does not prescribe a single referencing style, so the centre's chosen style must be applied consistently. The work must be the candidate's own, with all borrowed words and ideas acknowledged, to meet the authenticity conditions of submitted coursework.
The discriminator is consistency and honesty. Inconsistent referencing, missing bibliography or unacknowledged borrowing all undermine an otherwise strong dissertation.
Dissertation brief15 marksWhy does accurate referencing matter for both fairness and the strength of a dissertation? (15 marks)Show worked answer →
A question about the purpose of referencing. Referencing matters for fairness because submitted coursework must be the candidate's own work with all sources acknowledged, and unacknowledged borrowing is plagiarism.
It also strengthens the dissertation: clear references let the reader see which words are the candidate's and which are quoted, and a bibliography shows the breadth of reading behind the argument, which supports the impression of independent study.
A strong answer links honesty and quality: good referencing both meets the rules and displays the scholarship the dissertation rewards.
Related dot points
- The dissertation task: an independent critical study of literature of 2,500 to 3,500 words, worth 30 marks, presenting sustained personal analysis of two or more related literary texts, on a topic and texts that must not overlap with the Literary Study paper.
What the SQA Advanced Higher English dissertation is: an independent critical study of literature of 2,500 to 3,500 words worth 30 marks, presenting sustained personal analysis of two or more related literary texts, on a topic and texts kept separate from the Literary Study paper.
- Choosing a topic and framing a thesis: selecting related literary texts and a focused, arguable topic, then framing a thesis sharp enough to drive a 2,500 to 3,500 word argument without becoming too broad or too narrow.
How to choose a focused, arguable dissertation topic and related texts for SQA Advanced Higher English, and frame a thesis sharp enough to drive a 2,500 to 3,500 word argument without being too broad to develop or too narrow to sustain.
- Structuring the dissertation argument: building an introduction that frames the thesis, body sections that each develop part of it through comparative analysis, and a conclusion that reaches an independent judgement, across the whole word count.
How to structure the SQA Advanced Higher English dissertation: an introduction that frames the thesis, body sections that each develop part of it through comparative analysis, and a conclusion that reaches an independent judgement, sustaining one argument across 2,500 to 3,500 words.
- Using evidence and secondary criticism: anchoring the argument in close analysis of primary texts and drawing on secondary criticism to support, extend or challenge your reading, without letting critics replace your own independent judgement.
How to use primary evidence and secondary criticism in the SQA Advanced Higher English dissertation: anchoring the argument in close analysis of the texts and drawing on criticism to support, extend or challenge your reading, while keeping your own independent judgement in control.
- Applying critical approaches: drawing on critical perspectives such as feminist, Marxist, postcolonial, psychoanalytic and narratological readings as tools to open up a text, judged by the insight they yield rather than the label applied.
How to use literary theory and critical approaches in SQA Advanced Higher English: drawing on feminist, Marxist, postcolonial, psychoanalytic and narratological readings as tools to open up a text, judged by the insight they yield rather than the label applied, especially in the dissertation.