Skip to main content
EnglandHistorySyllabus dot point

Why was there a disputed succession in 1066, and why did William win the throne?

The death of Edward the Confessor and the rival claims of Harold Godwinson, William of Normandy and Harald Hardrada, the battles of Gate Fulford and Stamford Bridge, the Battle of Hastings, and the reasons for William's victory.

A focused answer to the succession crisis of 1066 in OCR's Norman Conquest depth study, covering the death of Edward the Confessor, the rival claims of Harold Godwinson, William of Normandy and Harald Hardrada, the battles of Gate Fulford, Stamford Bridge and Hastings, and why William won.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.814 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The death of Edward and the three claimants
  3. The northern invasion: Gate Fulford and Stamford Bridge
  4. The Battle of Hastings
  5. Why did William win?
  6. Try this

What this dot point is asking

This is the heart of the Norman Conquest story: the disputed succession of 1066 and the campaign that put William on the throne. You need to explain why three men claimed the crown, how Harold fought off one invasion only to lose to another, and why William won at Hastings. Because the depth study uses interpretation questions, be ready to weigh different explanations for William's victory.

The death of Edward and the three claimants

The northern invasion: Gate Fulford and Stamford Bridge

The Battle of Hastings

Why did William win?

Try this

Q1. Name the three claimants to the English throne in 1066. [Knowledge recall]

  • Cue. Harold Godwinson, William of Normandy and Harald Hardrada.

Q2. Explain why Harold's army was at a disadvantage at Hastings. [Short explanation]

  • Cue. It had just fought and marched north for Stamford Bridge, so the men were exhausted and some reinforcements had not arrived, and the pursuit of William's feigned retreat broke their strong shield-wall position.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of OCR exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

OCR SHP 20188 marksHow useful are Sources A and B to a historian studying the Battle of Hastings?
Show worked answer →

The British depth study source utility question (8 marks, AO3). Judge usefulness through content and provenance, focused on the Battle of Hastings.

Content. Explain what each source shows, for example the Norman cavalry charges, the Saxon shield wall, the feigned retreats, or the death of Harold (the Bayeux Tapestry's famous scene).

Provenance. Weigh the origin and purpose. The Bayeux Tapestry was made for a Norman patron (probably Bishop Odo) and presents the Norman version; a chronicle's date and author shape what it stresses.

Judgement. Conclude how useful each is for understanding the battle, balancing vivid contemporary detail against the bias of a victor's account.

OCR SHP 202216 marks'William won the Battle of Hastings mainly because of Harold's mistakes.' How far do you agree with this statement?
Show worked answer →

The extended judgement question (16 marks; this depth-study essay does not carry the separate SPaG marks, which sit on the thematic study). Argue both sides with precise support and reach a clear judgement.

For Harold's mistakes. He marched south exhausted after Stamford Bridge, did not wait for reinforcements, and his men may have broken the shield wall to chase the feigned Norman retreat, fatally weakening their position.

Other factors. William's planning and leadership (cavalry, archers and combined tactics), the chance timing of the wind and Hardrada's invasion, and Norman discipline and the feigned retreats all contributed.

Judgement. Weigh Harold's errors against William's skill and luck. A strong answer argues that Harold's mistakes mattered but that William's leadership and good fortune were at least as important, and reaches a supported conclusion.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this