Skip to main content
EnglandAncient HistorySyllabus dot point

What are the prescribed sources for the Persian Empire study, and how do you use Greek and Persian evidence together?

The prescribed sources for the Persian Empire period study: Herodotus as the main Greek literary narrative (and its problems), and the Persian material evidence (the Cyrus Cylinder, the Behistun inscription and the Persepolis reliefs), and how to weigh one kind against the other.

An OCR GCSE Ancient History guide to the prescribed sources for the Persian Empire period study, explaining how to use Herodotus as the main Greek literary narrative (and the problems of a later, pro-Greek, moralising author) alongside the Persian material evidence (the Cyrus Cylinder, the Behistun inscription and the Persepolis reliefs), and how to weigh Greek against Persian sources.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.814 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

OCR's GCSE is an ancient-history course, so it prescribes the ancient sources you must study and questions you on them directly. For the Persian Empire period study, the prescribed evidence falls into two kinds: Herodotus, the main Greek literary narrative, and a set of Persian material sources (the Cyrus Cylinder, the Behistun inscription, the Persepolis reliefs). This page teaches the skill the whole course rewards: knowing what each source is, what it is valuable for, and how to weigh Greek against Persian evidence.

The answer

Herodotus: the main literary source and its problems

The exam never wants Herodotus retold as fact: it wants you to use him as evidence while flagging what he is.

The Persian material sources

All three are royal propaganda, which is exactly why they are valuable: they show how Persian kingship wished to be seen.

Weighing Greek against Persian evidence

A strong answer always asks "valuable for what?" rather than ruling a source simply reliable or biased.

Examples in context

A model answer turns each source's limitations into evidence and judges value for the specific enquiry.

Try this

Q1. Name the three prescribed Persian material sources for this period and the king each is most associated with. [Knowledge recall]

  • Cue. The Cyrus Cylinder (Cyrus), the Behistun inscription (Darius) and the Persepolis reliefs (Darius and his successors).

Q2. Explain why a propaganda source such as the Behistun inscription can still be useful to a historian. [Short source evaluation]

  • Cue. Because it is strong evidence of Persian royal ideology and the official version of events: it shows how the king wished to present himself and his rule, which is exactly what a study of Persian kingship needs, even though it is one-sided.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of OCR exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

OCR J198/01 20208 marksStudy Source A (Herodotus) and Source B (the Behistun inscription). Which source is more useful to a historian studying the Persian kings? Explain your answer. [8-mark source-utility question]
Show worked answer →

A Section A source-utility question (AO3). Judge usefulness through content and provenance, not just bias.

Herodotus. A full literary narrative, vivid and wide-ranging, but Greek, written about a century later, dependent on informants and given to moralising; useful for the sweep of events and Greek attitudes.

Behistun. The king's own contemporary monument, invaluable for Persian royal ideology and the official version of events, but self-justifying and one-sided.

Judgement. Conclude that each is more useful for different enquiries (Herodotus for the narrative and Greek view, Behistun for royal ideology), so usefulness depends on the question. The top level judges value for a stated enquiry rather than picking a "winner" in the abstract.

OCR J198/01 20225 marksStudy the Cyrus Cylinder. What does this source suggest about Persian royal ideology? [5-mark source-inference question]
Show worked answer →

A Section A source-inference question (AO3) on a prescribed Persian source.

Make inferences. The Cylinder presents the king as chosen and favoured by the local god (Marduk), as a restorer of temples and order, and as a liberator rather than a conqueror.

Support each point. Tie inferences to detail: the claim to enter Babylon peacefully, to restore cults and return displaced peoples shows an ideology of legitimate, pious, merciful kingship.

Top marks. Two or three developed inferences linked to the source, noting that it is royal propaganda and therefore strong evidence for ideology specifically.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this