Skip to main content
EnglandAncient HistorySyllabus dot point

How did the reforms of Ephialtes and Pericles transform Athens into a radical democracy?

The democratic reforms of 462 to 429 BC: the reforms of Ephialtes stripping power from the Areopagus, Pericles' introduction of pay for office and jury service, and how these changes created a radical direct democracy, studied through Aristotle's Athenaion Politeia and Plutarch.

An OCR GCSE Ancient History answer on the democratic reforms of Ephialtes and Pericles between 462 and 429 BC, covering the stripping of power from the Areopagus, the introduction of pay for jurors and office-holders, how Athens became a radical direct democracy, and how to use Aristotle's Athenaion Politeia and Plutarch as sources.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.814 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

The Greek depth study Athens in the Age of Pericles opens with the reforms that turned Athens into a radical democracy. You need to explain what Ephialtes did to the Areopagus in 462 BC, what Pericles added (above all pay for office and jury service), and how these changes made ordinary citizens sovereign. As a depth study, this is examined through source-utility questions, so you must handle Aristotle's Athenaion Politeia and Plutarch critically.

The answer

The reforms of Ephialtes (462 BC)

This was the decisive blow against aristocratic control. Ephialtes was murdered soon afterwards, and Pericles emerged as the leading democratic politician.

Pericles and pay for office

Pay mattered because most citizens were poor and could not afford to leave their farms or workshops to attend the Assembly, sit on juries or hold office. Pay meant participation was open to all, not just the leisured rich, which is what made the democracy radical.

Why this made Athens a radical democracy

Using the sources critically

Examples in context

A model answer explains how each reform increased the power of ordinary citizens, rather than just naming them.

Try this

Q1. What did Ephialtes do to the Areopagus in 462 BC? [Knowledge recall]

  • Cue. He stripped it of nearly all its political powers, leaving it only as a homicide court, and transferred those powers to the Assembly, the Council of 500 and the popular courts.

Q2. Explain why Pericles' introduction of pay made the democracy more radical. [Short explanation]

  • Cue. Because most citizens were poor and could not afford to leave their work, pay for juries and offices let ordinary citizens take part in government, widening participation from the leisured rich to the whole citizen body.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of OCR exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

OCR J198/01 201910 marksExplain why the reforms of Ephialtes and Pericles made Athens more democratic. [10-mark depth-study explanation question]
Show worked answer →

A depth-study explanation question (AO1 and AO2) on change.

Knowledge. Ephialtes (462 BC) stripped the aristocratic Areopagus of most of its political powers, transferring them to the Assembly, the Council of 500 and the popular courts; Pericles introduced state pay for jurors and office-holders.

Explanation. Reward developed reasons: removing the Areopagus's powers shifted control to bodies open to ordinary citizens; pay meant poorer citizens could afford to take part; together they widened participation and made the people (demos) sovereign.

Top band. Explain how each reform increased the power of ordinary citizens and judge which mattered most, distinguishing the transfer of powers from the practical effect of pay.

OCR J198/01 20218 marksStudy Aristotle, Athenaion Politeia, on the reforms of Ephialtes. How useful is this source for understanding the growth of Athenian democracy? [8-mark depth-study source-utility question]
Show worked answer →

A depth-study source-utility question (AO3). Judge usefulness through content and provenance.

Content. The Athenaion Politeia describes Ephialtes removing the powers of the Areopagus and the steps by which the democracy grew; draw out the relevant detail.

Provenance. It is a later, fourth-century analytical account (from Aristotle's school), valuable for its systematic description but written long after the events and shaped by later political debate; it is not contemporary.

Judgement. Conclude that it is useful as a structured later analysis of the constitution but must be tested against its date and purpose, and judge its value for the specific enquiry rather than labelling it reliable or unreliable.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this