What did people believe about disease, and how did they treat it, in medieval Britain c1250 to 1500?
Medieval ideas about the cause of disease (the Four Humours, miasma, religion and astrology), approaches to prevention and treatment, who provided care, public health in towns and monasteries, and the response to the Black Death of 1348 to 1349.
A focused answer to the medieval period of Edexcel's Medicine in Britain thematic study, covering ideas about the cause of disease, the dominance of Galen and the Church, medieval prevention and treatment, who provided care, public health, and the response to the Black Death.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
This is the opening period of Edexcel's Paper 1 thematic study, Medicine in Britain c1250 to present. You need to explain how medieval people understood the cause of disease, how they tried to prevent and treat it, who gave care, the state of public health, and how they responded to the Black Death. As a thematic study, the marks reward your grasp of why medicine changed so little here, which sets up the contrast with later periods.
Ideas about the cause of disease
Alongside this, people believed disease could be a punishment from God for sin, caused by miasma (bad or corrupted air), or caused by the movement of the planets and stars (astrology). These ideas coexisted, and a physician might use several at once. None identified the true cause of disease, which is the key to why so little changed.
The influence of Galen and the Church
Doctors also placed huge respect on ancient authority, trusting Galen and Hippocrates above their own observation. This combination, a powerful Church and unquestioned old authorities, is the heart of the Edexcel "why little changed" question.
Prevention, treatment and care
Prevention focused on keeping the humours balanced through regimen sanitatis: advice on diet, sleep, exercise and avoiding bad air. People purified the air with herbs and tried to avoid sin. Treatment mixed Galen's ideas with herbal remedies, bleeding and purging, charms and prayer.
Trained physicians were university educated, rare and expensive, and diagnosed using urine charts and the position of the planets. Most everyday care came from apothecaries (who mixed and sold remedies), barber surgeons (who did bleeding and minor surgery), and women treating the sick at home. Hospitals, often run by monasteries, mostly offered rest, warmth, food and prayer rather than cures, and many refused the seriously ill or infectious.
Public health
The Black Death, 1348 to 1349
Try this
Q1. Name the theory that said illness was an imbalance in the body. [Knowledge recall]
- Cue. The Theory of the Four Humours, developed by Galen.
Q2. Explain why medieval medical treatment changed so slowly. [Short explanation]
- Cue. A powerful Church taught Galen as near sacred and discouraged challenges, doctors respected ancient authority over observation, and nobody knew the true cause of disease, so treatments could not be improved.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of Pearson Edexcel exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
Edexcel 20184 marksDescribe two features of medieval ideas about the cause of disease.Show worked answer →
The Paper 1 "Describe two features" question (4 marks). Markers reward two distinct features, each with a supporting detail. Do not explain why, just state and develop.
Feature one. The Theory of the Four Humours dominated. Developed by Galen from Hippocrates, it said illness came from an imbalance of blood, phlegm, yellow bile and black bile.
Feature two. Supernatural and environmental explanations were common. Many people blamed God sending disease as a punishment for sin, or miasma (bad air), or the movement of the planets.
Full marks. Two clear features, each with one supporting sentence of detail. Two marks per feature.
Edexcel 201912 marksExplain why there was little change in medical treatment in the period c1250 to 1500.Show worked answer →
The Paper 1 thematic "Explain why" question (12 marks). Markers reward at least three explained reasons, supported with precise detail, that directly answer why treatment barely changed.
Reason one (the Church). The Church was hugely powerful and taught Galen's ideas as near sacred because they fitted belief in a single creator, so it discouraged challenges and restricted dissection.
Reason two (respect for ancient authority). Doctors trusted Galen and Hippocrates above their own observation, so they repeated old treatments such as bleeding and purging rather than testing new ones.
Reason three (no knowledge of the true cause). With no understanding of germs, treatments based on the humours and miasma could never be improved, because they targeted the wrong thing.
Top band. Three developed reasons, each tied back to the lack of change, with specific supporting detail.
Related dot points
- Renaissance ideas about the cause of disease, the challenge to Galen by Vesalius and Harvey, the work of Sydenham, the impact of the printing press and the Royal Society, continuity in treatment, and the response to the Great Plague of 1665.
A focused answer to the Renaissance period of Edexcel's Medicine in Britain thematic study, covering how Vesalius and Harvey challenged Galen, the work of Sydenham, the role of the printing press and the Royal Society, the continuity in everyday treatment, and the response to the Great Plague of 1665.
- The breakthroughs of c1700 to 1900: Jenner and vaccination, Pasteur's germ theory and Koch's microbes, the development of anaesthetics by Simpson and antiseptics by Lister, Nightingale and nursing, and the move to government public health.
A focused answer to the c1700 to 1900 period of Edexcel's Medicine in Britain thematic study, covering Jenner's vaccination, Pasteur's germ theory, Koch's microbes, anaesthetics (Simpson) and antiseptics (Lister), Nightingale and nursing, and the shift from laissez faire to government public health.
- Change and continuity in the prevention of disease and public health across the whole thematic study, from medieval regulations and monasteries, through the 1875 Public Health Act, to modern vaccination, screening and lifestyle campaigns.
A focused answer tracing prevention of disease and public health across the whole Edexcel Medicine thematic study, comparing medieval town regulations and monasteries, the laissez faire era, the 1875 Public Health Act, and modern vaccination, screening and lifestyle campaigns, with the factors driving change.
- The factors that encouraged or inhibited change in medicine across the thematic study (individuals, institutions, science and technology, attitudes in government and society, war and chance) and the key turning points such as germ theory.
A focused answer to the factors of change at the heart of Edexcel's Medicine thematic study, explaining how individuals, institutions, science and technology, attitudes, war and chance each drove or held back medical progress, and identifying the major turning points such as germ theory.
- Analysing sources in Edexcel GCSE History: making inferences from a source, judging the usefulness of one or more sources for a stated enquiry using content and provenance (nature, origin and purpose), and applying contextual knowledge.
A focused answer to the Edexcel GCSE History source questions, covering how to make inferences from a source, and how to weigh content against provenance (nature, origin and purpose) and use contextual knowledge to judge the usefulness of sources for a stated enquiry.
Sources & how we know this
- Pearson Edexcel GCSE (9-1) History (1HI0) specification — Pearson Edexcel (2016)
- Medicine in Britain, c1250 to present (Option 11) topic booklet — Pearson Edexcel (2016)