How do religion and science explain the origins of the universe and life?
Religious and scientific accounts of the origins of the universe and of human life, and whether they can be reconciled, plus the duty of stewardship over creation.
A focused answer on origins for AQA GCSE Religious Studies A (8062), covering religious creation accounts, the Big Bang and evolution, and whether religion and science can agree.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
AQA wants you to compare religious and scientific accounts of the origins of the universe and of life, explain whether they can be reconciled, and outline the religious duty of stewardship. The key skill is distinguishing a literal reading of scripture from belief in a creator, because the evaluation question turns on that distinction.
Scientific accounts
These theories are well supported and widely accepted by scientists. Importantly, they answer the question of how the universe and life developed; they do not, in themselves, claim to answer why there is anything at all, which is where many believers say religion still has something to say.
Religious accounts
For believers, the central claim is not a timetable but that the universe is not an accident: it exists because God willed it, it is ordered and good, and human beings have a special status and responsibility within it.
Can they agree
Some literalist believers (such as young earth creationists) take Genesis as exact historical and scientific fact and therefore reject the Big Bang and evolution. Many other believers, however, read Genesis non-literally, as a poem or symbolic account whose purpose is to teach that God is the creator and the world is good, not to give science. For them the Big Bang and evolution describe how God created, so the two accounts are compatible: science explains the mechanism, religion explains the meaning and purpose. Some also argue that the order and apparent fine tuning of the universe point to a designer behind the natural processes.
Stewardship
Both Christianity and Islam teach stewardship: because God created the world and entrusted it to humanity, people have a duty to care for it rather than exploit it. In Islam, humans are Khalifah (custodians) who will answer to Allah for how they treated the earth. This duty links the topic of origins to the environment: if the world is God's creation, damaging it is a religious wrong.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of AQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
AQA 20182 marksWhat does the scientific Big Bang theory explain?Show worked answer →
A 2-mark AO1 question. The Big Bang theory explains the origin of the universe from a single, extremely dense point that expanded around 13.8 billion years ago. One mark for the origin of the universe, the second for the expansion from a single point. Do not confuse it with evolution, which explains the development of life, not the universe.
AQA 20204 marksExplain two ways some believers reconcile religious and scientific accounts of origins. Refer to scripture or another source of religious belief in your answer.Show worked answer →
A 4-mark AO1 question. Way one: they treat the Big Bang and evolution as the method God used, so science explains how and religion explains why, with Genesis read non-literally as a poem about God as creator. Way two: they argue the order and fine tuning of the universe point to a designer behind the science, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" (Genesis 1:1). Markers reward two distinct, developed ways plus a source. Note that literalists reject this reconciliation.
AQA 202212 marks"Science has proved that religious accounts of creation are wrong." Evaluate this statement. In your answer you should refer to religious teaching, give reasoned arguments to support this statement, give reasoned arguments to support a different point of view, and reach a justified conclusion. [12 marks plus 3 SPaG]Show worked answer →
The AO2 evaluation, 5 bands plus 3 SPaG. Arguments for: the Big Bang and evolution, backed by fossils, DNA and the expanding universe, contradict a literal six day creation, so literal accounts look false. Arguments against: most believers read Genesis non-literally as describing why the world exists, accept science as God's method, and note science cannot explain why there is anything at all or answer questions of purpose. Use terms (Big Bang, evolution, literalism, stewardship). Reach a justified conclusion distinguishing literal accounts from religious belief in a creator.
Related dot points
- The sanctity and quality of life, when life begins, and religious and ethical attitudes to abortion in Christianity and Islam.
A focused answer on the sanctity of life and abortion for AQA GCSE Religious Studies A (8062), covering the sanctity of life, when life begins and attitudes to abortion.
- Religious and ethical attitudes to euthanasia, the value of life, end-of-life care, and beliefs about death and life after death.
A focused answer on euthanasia and death for AQA GCSE Religious Studies A (8062), covering types of euthanasia, religious attitudes, the hospice movement and beliefs about death.
- Religious teachings on stewardship and dominion, the use of animals for food and experiments, and the duty to care for the environment and natural resources.
A focused answer on animals and the environment for AQA GCSE Religious Studies A (8062), covering stewardship, dominion, use of animals and care for the planet.
- The doctrine of the Trinity as Father, Son and Holy Spirit, and the role of the Word and the Spirit in the creation of the universe.
A focused answer on the Trinity and Christian creation for AQA GCSE Religious Studies A (8062), covering Father, Son and Holy Spirit and the role of the Word and Spirit in creation.
Sources & how we know this
- AQA GCSE Religious Studies A (8062) specification — AQA (2016)