How did Hitler's foreign policy and aggression push Europe towards war?
Hitler's foreign policy aims, German rearmament and the remilitarisation of the Rhineland, the Anschluss with Austria, and the growing tension across Europe by 1938.
A focused answer to the road to war section of AQA's Conflict and tension depth study, covering Hitler's foreign policy aims, rearmament, the remilitarisation of the Rhineland, the Anschluss with Austria and the rising tension that set Europe on course for war.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
This section of the wider world depth study covers the steps by which Hitler broke the Treaty of Versailles and raised tension in Europe between 1933 and 1938. You need his foreign policy aims and then the sequence of moves, rearmament, the Rhineland, alliances and the Anschluss, and crucially the analysis of why each unopposed step made the next more likely. The 16-mark essay frequently asks you to rank these steps.
Hitler's foreign policy aims
These aims were not secret: Hitler had set out the core ideas in Mein Kampf in the 1920s. They mattered because each was incompatible with the 1919 settlement. Destroying Versailles meant rearming and reversing the territorial terms; uniting German-speakers meant absorbing Austria and the Sudetenland; Lebensraum meant expansion into Poland and the USSR. Understanding the aims lets you explain why the individual steps below were not random opportunism but a connected programme.
Rearmament and the Rhineland
From 1933 Hitler began secret rearmament, then announced it openly in 1935 with the reintroduction of conscription and the creation of an air force (the Luftwaffe), in clear breach of Versailles. The Western response was weak and even encouraging: in the Anglo-German Naval Agreement (1935), Britain agreed to let Germany build a navy up to 35 percent of the Royal Navy's size, accepting another breach of the treaty and undermining any common front with France.
The Rhineland is the pivotal moment for analysis. Hitler later admitted the 48 hours after the troops moved in were the most nerve-racking of his life. The fact that the Western powers stood aside taught him that bold action would not be challenged, which directly shaped his willingness to risk the Anschluss two years later.
Alliances and the Anschluss
Hitler strengthened his diplomatic position by ending Germany's isolation. He backed Franco's Nationalists in the Spanish Civil War from 1936, using it to test new weapons such as the dive-bombers that destroyed Guernica, and he built alliances: the Rome-Berlin Axis with Mussolini's Italy (1936) and the Anti-Comintern Pact with Japan (1936), aimed against communism. These ties reduced the chance of Italy opposing him, which had blocked an earlier attempt at Anschluss in 1934.
By the end of 1938 the pattern was complete: each unopposed move had broken Versailles, raised tension and increased Hitler's confidence, leaving Europe poised for the Sudetenland crisis and the slide to war covered in the next dot point.
Try this
Q1. State two of Hitler's foreign policy aims. [Knowledge recall]
- Cue. Destroy Versailles, unite German-speakers, gain Lebensraum, or destroy communism (any two).
Q2. Explain why the remilitarisation of the Rhineland was such a gamble for Hitler. [Short explanation]
- Cue. His army was small and ordered to retreat if France resisted; success when France did nothing proved appeasement worked and emboldened his later moves.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of AQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
AQA 20198 marksWrite an account of the ways in which Hitler's actions between 1935 and 1938 increased tension in Europe.Show worked answer →
The Paper 1 narrative account question (8 marks, AO1 and AO2). Markers reward a linked, analytical sequence rather than a list.
Possible sequence. Hitler announced rearmament and conscription in 1935, breaking Versailles, and Britain accepted a larger German navy in the Anglo-German Naval Agreement, which encouraged him. This led to the remilitarisation of the Rhineland in March 1936, a gamble that succeeded because France did nothing, raising his confidence. As a result he risked the Anschluss with Austria in March 1938, again unopposed. Each unopposed move increased tension and made the next more likely, leaving Europe closer to war.
Top band. Use linking phrases to show how one action led to the next, ending on the named outcome (rising tension by 1938).
AQA 202116 marksHow far do you agree that the remilitarisation of the Rhineland in 1936 was the most important step on the road to war? Explain your answer.Show worked answer →
The 16-mark "how far" essay (plus 4 SPaG marks). Argue both sides and judge.
For the Rhineland. It was Hitler's first move of troops into a demilitarised, strategic area; success when France stood aside proved appeasement worked and emboldened every later step.
Against (other steps mattered). Rearmament from 1935 rebuilt the means to fight; the Anschluss (1938) added Austria's resources and surrounded Czechoslovakia; the alliances (Rome-Berlin Axis, Anti-Comintern Pact) isolated potential opponents.
Judgement. A strong answer argues the steps formed a chain in which the Rhineland was pivotal because it tested and confirmed Anglo-French inaction, but that no single step alone made war certain. Reach a clear, criteria-based verdict (which step was most decisive and why).
Related dot points
- The armistice and the aims of the Big Three, the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, German reactions to the treaty and the wider peace settlement of 1919 to 1920.
A focused answer to the peacemaking section of AQA's Conflict and tension depth study, covering the differing aims of the Big Three, the main terms of the Treaty of Versailles, the bitter German reaction, and the wider settlement with the other defeated powers.
- The aims and structure of the League of Nations, its successes and failures in the 1920s, and how the Manchurian and Abyssinian crises destroyed it in the 1930s.
A focused answer to the League of Nations section of AQA's Conflict and tension depth study, covering the League's aims and structure, its mixed record in the 1920s, and how the Depression and the Manchurian and Abyssinian crises exposed its fatal weaknesses.
- The policy of appeasement and the Sudetenland and Munich Agreement, the Nazi-Soviet Pact, and the invasion of Poland that triggered war in September 1939.
A focused answer to the final section of AQA's Conflict and tension depth study, covering the policy of appeasement, the Sudetenland crisis and the Munich Agreement, the Nazi-Soviet Pact, and the invasion of Poland that brought Britain and France into the war in September 1939.
- Writing an analytical narrative account that selects relevant events, places them in order and explains how each event led to the next towards an outcome.
A focused answer to the AQA GCSE History narrative account question, covering how to select relevant events, sequence them in order and link each one to the next so the account analyses how events developed rather than simply listing them.
- Planning and writing a balanced 16-mark essay that argues both sides, supports each point with precise evidence and reaches a justified, criteria-based judgement.
A focused answer to the AQA GCSE History 16-mark essay, covering how to plan a balanced argument, support each point with precise evidence, reach a justified judgement and pick up the spelling, punctuation and grammar marks attached to this question.
Sources & how we know this
- AQA GCSE History (8145) specification — AQA (2016)