Skip to main content
EnglandDesign and TechnologySyllabus dot point

How does research and the work of others inform a successful design?

Investigation, primary and secondary data, understanding the needs of clients and users, and the work of past and present designers and companies that influence design thinking.

A focused answer to AQA GCSE Design and Technology making principle on investigation and the work of others, covering primary and secondary research, user needs, and influential designers and companies.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.89 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. Primary and secondary data
  3. Clients and users
  4. The work of others

What this dot point is asking

This is AQA section 3.3.1, which opens the designing and making principles. AQA wants you to carry out investigation that informs a design, distinguishing primary from secondary data, identifying the needs of clients and users, and learning from the work of past and present designers and companies. In Paper 1 this is examined through questions on the difference between primary and secondary research and on how the work of others influences design.

Primary and secondary data

Each has trade-offs that examiners reward you for knowing. Primary data is specific, current and reliable for your exact problem, but it is slow and costly to gather. Secondary data is quick, cheap and broad, but it may be general, biased or out of date because it was collected for another purpose. Using both together gives a fuller, more balanced picture and reduces the risk of designing on one weak source. A common primary method is product analysis, where the designer takes apart and tests an existing product to learn its materials, construction, cost and weaknesses.

Clients and users

For example, a school (client) might commission playground equipment for children (users); the school cares about cost and durability, the children about fun and safety. Good research separates these, often using user profiles or personas to keep the real user in mind. Identifying who the user is also drives ergonomics and anthropometrics, fitting the product to human size and ability.

The work of others

Studying past and present designers and companies shows how similar problems have been solved, which materials and proportions worked, what design movements influenced a style, and what made a product commercially successful. Designers and companies such as Dieter Rams, Sir James Dyson, Apple and Braun are common reference points. The aim is to inspire and inform original work and set a quality benchmark, not to copy, since copying is both unoriginal and a breach of intellectual property.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of AQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AQA 20204 marksExplain the difference between primary and secondary research, giving one example of each that a designer could use when designing a kitchen product.
Show worked answer →

A 4-mark question splits across the two definitions and two examples.

Primary research is first-hand information the designer collects, so it is specific and up to date but takes time. An example for a kitchen product is interviewing cooks about how they use a peeler, or analysing existing peelers by handling and testing them.

Secondary research is information from existing sources that someone else gathered, so it is quick and cheap but may be general or out of date. An example is reading a consumer review website or a market report on kitchen-gadget sales.

Markers reward (1) primary is first-hand or collected by the designer, (2) secondary already exists, (3) a valid example of each. Swapping the two (calling a survey secondary) loses marks.

AQA 20183 marksExplain how studying the work of a past or present designer can benefit a student developing a new product.
Show worked answer →

A 3-mark Explain wants developed reasoning, not just "for ideas".

Studying a designer such as Dieter Rams or a company such as Apple shows how they solved similar problems, the materials and proportions they used and what made their products commercially successful, which inspires and informs original work. It can reveal a design style or principle (such as Rams' "less but better") that the student adapts. It also sets a quality benchmark to aim at.

Importantly the work is used to inform, not to copy, so the student develops an original product influenced by good practice. Markers reward (1) inspiration or insight into solving the problem, (2) learning materials, style or what makes products succeed, (3) the point that it informs rather than copies. Saying only "to get ideas" caps the mark.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this